Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Collier, 553 So. 2d 815.

158 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Jermeil Young La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2026
State of Louisiana v. Joey Ray Deville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
and has been codified by the legislature in La.Code Crim.P.
State of Louisiana v. Trevor Marcel Williams La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
State of Louisiana v. Michael Thibodeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
“The neutral explanation must be one which is clear, reasonable, specific, legitimate and related to the particular case at bar.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Kenneth Jones La. 2019
1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), (La.
State v. Youngblood 274 So. 3d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
16 State v. Collier , , 822 (La.
State of Louisiana Versus Ron C. Youngblood La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
The accepted juror may have exhibited traits which the prosecutor could have reasonably believed would make him desirable as a juror.16 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Lee Turner, Jr. 263 So. 3d 337 La. 2018
“The neutral explanation must be one which is clear, reasonable, specific, legitimate and related to the particular case at bar.” (La.
State v. Hampton 261 So. 3d 993 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Kitts 250 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Collier , , 819-20 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Larry Broussard, Jr. AKA Larry James Broussard, Jr. AKA Larry J. Broussard, Jr. La. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Samuel Anderson -Aka- Samuel Brent Anderson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
and has been codified by the legislature in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 795(C) and (D).
State v. Anderson 258 So. 3d 44 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
The holding in Batson was initially adopted by this Court in State v. Collier , and has been codified by the legislature in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 795(C) and (D)....
State of Louisiana v. Kennon Richard AKA Kennan Richard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
The holding in 5 and has been codified in Louisiana law under La.Code Crim.P.
State of Louisiana v. Christopher O. James La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
1488 (2001), the Louisiana Supreme Court set out criteria for evaluating the State’s answer to whether the peremptory challenge was race-neutral: 13 Although the state’s explanation must be based on more than an assumption or a hunch, State v. Collier, [], to be facially valid, it need not be persuasive, or even plausible; thus unless a discriminatory intent is inherent in the prosecutor’s explanation, the reason offered will be deemed race- neutral.
State v. Richard 216 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
The holding in | fí and has been codified in Louisiana law under La.Code Crim.P.
State v. James 216 So. 3d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
1488 , 149 L.Ed.2d 375 (2001), the Louisiana Supreme Court set out criteria for evaluating the State’s answer to whether the peremptory challenge was race-neutral: __|_yAlthough the state’s explanation must be based on more than an assumption or a hunch, State v. Collier, [ ], to be facially valid, it need not be persuasive, or even plausible; thus unless a discriminatory intent is inherent in the prosecutor’s explanation, the reason offered will be deemed race-neutral.
State of Louisiana v. Jonathan Jerome Guillory La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
and has been codified by the legislature in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 795(C) and (D).
State v. Guillory 206 So. 3d 1153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
and has been codified by the legislature in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 795(C) and (D).
State of Louisiana v. Robert Leroy McCoy 218 So. 3d 535 La. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Larry Broussard, Jr. AKA Larry James Broussard Jr. AKA Larry J. Broussard Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
and has been codified by the legislature in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 795(C) and (D).
State v. Broussard 201 So. 3d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
and has been codified by the legislature in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 795(C) and (D)....
State of Louisiana v. Ceasar James Williams -Aka- Ceaser James Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
and has been codified by the legislature in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 795(C) and (D).
State of Louisiana v. Johnny Lee Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
and has been codified by the legislature in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 795(C) and (D).
State of Louisiana v. David E. Bender 152 So. 3d 126 La. 2014
DISCUSSION The issue before us is whether a violation of the Fourth Circuit’s “Knighten rule” mandates a reversal of the jury’s verdict under the United States Supreme Court’s holding in Batson , and was codified by the Legislature in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 795.
State v. Fielding 130 So. 3d 1052 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Pierce 131 So. 3d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
and has been codified by the legislature in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 795(C) and (D).
State v. Davis 121 So. 3d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
and has been codified by the legislature in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 795(C) and (D).
State v. Bender 120 So. 3d 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
4th Cir.1992) ( n. 5 (La.1989)).
State v. Coleman 121 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
and has been codified by the legislature in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 795(C) and (D).
State of Louisiana v. Brendall Bourque La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
and has been codified by the legislature in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 795(C) and (D).
State v. Bourque 114 So. 3d 642 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
and has been codified by the legislature in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 795(C) and (D).
State of Louisiana v. Robert Daniel Wilkins La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
United States v. Clemons, 843 F.2d 741 (3rd Cir.1988) (striking a single black juror could constitute a prima facie case even when blacks ultimately sit on the panel and even when valid reasons exist for striking other blacks); United States v. David, 803 F.2d 1567, 1571 (
State v. Wilkins 94 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
United States v. Clemons, 843 F.2d 741 (3rd Cir.1988) (striking a single black juror could constitute a prima facie case even when blacks ultimately sit on the panel and even when valid reasons exist for striking other blacks); United States v. David, 803 F.2d 1567, 1571 (11th Cir.1986) (“the striking
State v. Massey 91 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
2s At the second step of the Batson inquiry, the issue is the facial validity of the prosecutor’s explanation.
State v. Nelson 85 So. 3d 21 La. 2012
and has been codified by the legislature in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 795(C) and (D).
State v. Victor 82 So. 3d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
State v. McElveen 73 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The use of a peremptory strike against Ms. Johnson, regardless of her race, was therefore “clear, reasonable, specific, legitimate and related to the particular case at bar.”
State v. Dorsey 74 So. 3d 603 La. 2011
and has been codified by the legislature in Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure article 795(C) and (D).
State v. Williams 54 So. 3d 1129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Goldman 41 So. 3d 642 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
State v. Prejean 24 So. 3d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State of Louisiana v. Terrell Stipe La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
2077, 114 L.Ed.2d 660 (1991) (dealing with civil trials); (holding that un-rebutted prima facie case requires reversal; La.
State v. Stipe 4 So. 3d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
2077 , 114 L.Ed.2d 660 (1991) (dealing with civil trials); (holding that un-rebutted prima facie case requires reversal; La.
State of Louisiana v. Norris A. Palms La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
“The neutral explanation must be one which is clear, reasonably specific, legitimate, and related to the particular case at bar.”
State of Louisiana v. Raymond J. Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
“The neutral explanation must be one which is clear, reasonably specific, legitimate, and related to the particular case at bar.”
State of Louisiana v. Kearney Alsandor La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. ALSANDOR 970 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
State v. Jones 968 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Coleman, 41,764 (La.App.2d Cir.1/24/07), .
State v. Coleman 970 So. 2d 511 La. 2007
1769 , 131 L.Ed.2d 834 (1995) (per curiam) (citations omitted); Hernandez v. New York, 500 U.S. 352, 358-59 , 111 S.Ct.