Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Collier, 553 So. 2d 815.

158 citing documents.

State v. Singleton 953 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
The State contends that, Defendant must give a race neutral explanation that is clear, reasonably specific, legitimate, and related to the particular case being tried, but the trial court may reject Defendant's race neutral reasons because they are not based in fact.
State of Louisiana v. Justin Charles Singleton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
The State contends that, Defendant must give 1 Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct.
Alex v. Rayne Concrete Service 951 So. 2d 138 La. 2007
State v. Coleman 949 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
State v. Wilson, 40,767 (La.App.2d Cir.8/23/06), .
State v. Gant 942 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
(La.1989), citing Batson, 476 U.S. at 97-98, 106 S.Ct.
State v. Snyder 942 So. 2d 484 La. 2006
See Juniors, 03-2425 at p. 31, 915 So.2d at 317-18 ; (La.
State v. Wilson 938 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Elie 936 So. 2d 791 La. 2006
State v. Weary 931 So. 2d 297 La. 2006
1769 , 131 L.Ed.2d 834 (1995) (per curiam) (citations omitted)
State v. Qualls 921 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
State v. Scott 921 So. 2d 904 La. 2006
State v. Heard 917 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Juniors 915 So. 2d 291 La. 2005
State v. Magee 916 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
State v. Elie 899 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
-21 (La.1989): After the prosecutor has presented reasons for his use of a peremptory challenge which on their face are racially neutral, an issue of fact is joined, and the trial court must assess the weight and credibility of the explanation in order to determine whether there was purposeful discrimination in th
State v. Givens 888 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
He cites several additional cases, however, in that case, the trial judge considering Batson objections stated that the defendant "would not have a jury of his peers if the racial composition of the petit jury was disproportionate to the racial composition of the parish."
State v. Manning 885 So. 2d 1044 La. 2004
1769 , 131 L.Ed.2d 834 (1995) (Per Curiam)
State v. Crawford 873 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Robinson 874 So. 2d 66 La. 2004
State v. Stewart 866 So. 2d 1016 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
State v. Dunn 831 So. 2d 862 La. 2002
State v. Wade 832 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
State v. Harris 820 So. 2d 471 La. 2002
2077 , 114 L.Ed.2d 660 (1991) (dealing with civil trials); (holding that un-rebutted prima facie case requires reversal; La.
State v. Zeno 811 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
State v. Ball 824 So. 2d 1089 La. 2002
1769 , 131 L.Ed.2d 834 (1995)(per curiam) (citations omitted)
State v. Wilson 806 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
1769 , 131 L.Ed.2d 834 (1995) (per curiam) (citations omitted)
State v. Duncan 802 So. 2d 533 La. 2001
State v. Neal 796 So. 2d 649 La. 2001
1769 , 131 L.Ed.2d 834 (1995) (per curiam) (citations omitted)
State v. Jacobs 803 So. 2d 933 La. 2001
State v. Anderson 786 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Johnson 783 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
at 1722-1723 ; (1989); State v. Jones, 00-162 (La.App.
State v. Pena 788 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
State v. Taylor 781 So. 2d 1205 La. 2001
1769 , 131 L.Ed.2d 834 (1995)
State v. Jones 767 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Tilley 767 So. 2d 6 La. 2000
1769 , 131 L.Ed.2d 834 (1995)(per curiam) (citations omitted); (La.
State v. Hoffman 768 So. 2d 542 La. 2000
State v. Myers 761 So. 2d 498 La. 2000
2077 , 114 L.Ed.2d 660 (1991) (dealing with civil trials); (holding that un-rebutted prima facie case requires reversal; La.
State v. Hobley 752 So. 2d 771 La. 1999
Matthews v. Arkla Lubricants Inc. 740 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Batson, supra ; Smith, supra .
State v. Myers 737 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
State v. Snyder 750 So. 2d 832 La. 1999
1769 , 131 L.Ed.2d 834 (1995) (Per Curiam); (La.
State v. Tyler 723 So. 2d 939 La. 1998
this court reversed the overruling of a Batson objection because the trial judge simply accepted the prosecutor's explanation for his challenges, which were facially neutral, without assessing the weight and credibility of the explanation.
State v. Williams 708 So. 2d 703 La. 1998
1769 , 131 L.Ed.2d 834 (1995) (Per Curiam) (citations omitted)
State v. Brown 702 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Galliano 696 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Lee v. Magnolia Garden Apartments 694 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Young, 613 So.2d at 634 .
State v. Jackson 694 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. Dugas 691 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
State v. Banks 694 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
State v. McClain 685 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996