Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Collier, 553 So. 2d 815.

158 citing documents.

State v. Dobbins 685 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Schexnayder 685 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Cyriak 684 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
The state acknowledges this rule, which held that a defendant has the initial burden to establish a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination.
State v. Ellis 677 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Leagea 673 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
State v. Tart 672 So. 2d 116 La. 1996
Green, p. 24; 655 So.2d at 288
State v. Durham 673 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
State v. Prout 672 So. 2d 933 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
See Collier [ ], supra, 553 So.2d at 818 .
State v. Hampton 670 So. 2d 1349 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. Parker 661 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Smith v. Lincoln General Hosp. 658 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Payne 657 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Green 655 So. 2d 272 La. 1995
State v. Green 655 So. 2d 252 La. 1995
20 cert, denied, 488 U.S. 871, 109 S.Ct.
State v. Maize 655 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Nieves 653 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
State v. Toney 651 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Fleeks 651 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
State v. Mamon 648 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
State v. Giles 639 So. 2d 323 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
1712 , 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986)
State v. Dabney 633 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated as follows: The trial judge must determine whether the defendant has established the requisite prima facie case.
State v. Stewart 633 So. 2d 925 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
State v. Spencer 631 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
at 820 (citing Batson, supra, 476 U.S. at 97-98 , 106 S.Ct.
State v. Azema 633 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Rice 626 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
State v. Davis 626 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
State v. Arbuthnot 625 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Watkins 625 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Holmes v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. 622 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Batson, 476 U.S. at 96-97 , 106 S.Ct.
State v. Johnson 621 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
at 1714 , 90 L.Ed.2d at 76-77
State v. LeBlanc 618 So. 2d 949 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
State v. Young 613 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Dukes 609 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Knox 609 So. 2d 803 La. 1992
While I personally agree with Batson , I am inclined to disagree with the reasoning in McCollum *809 that a criminal defense attorney, while defending his client against the state, is a state actor.
State v. Knighten 609 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
State v. Williams 610 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Hensley 608 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
-819 (La.1989), our Supreme Court stated: "Under Batson [v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 106 S.Ct.
State v. Rose 606 So. 2d 845 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. King 604 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Thomas 604 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
State v. Chatman 599 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Powell 598 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Melancon 596 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Jones 596 So. 2d 1360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Hamilton 594 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
[3] While we acknowledge that the mere presence of black jury members does not automatically defeat an inference of discrimination, we factually distinguish Collier and agree that a prima facie case of discrimination was not established in the instant case.
State v. Granier 592 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
1364 , 113 L.Ed.2d 411 (1991)
State v. Jones 593 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
State v. Tucker 591 So. 2d 1208 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Swafford 588 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Jones 588 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
citing Tompkins v. Texas, 774 S.W.2d 195, 202 (Tx.Crim.App.1987), affirmed without opinion by an equally divided court 490 U.S. 754 , 109 S.Ct.