Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Penalber v. Blount, 550 So. 2d 577.

353 citing documents.

Knapper v. Connick 668 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Herman v. Rome 668 So. 2d 1202 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Monaghan v. Caserta 666 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Haydel v. Hercules Transport, Inc., 94-0016 (La.App.
Breaux v. Béné 664 So. 2d 1377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Joyner v. Wear 665 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Burris v. Vinet 664 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Doe v. Doe 665 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Sumner v. Sumner 664 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
McCoy v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 664 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Myers v. Burch 664 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Breaux v. Romero & Associates, Inc. 664 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Burris v. LaSalle Parish Police Jury 664 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Griffin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 662 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Roberts v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 662 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Genusa v. B & B Steel Metal & Roofing 663 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Middleton v. International Maintenance 671 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Woodland Ridge Ass'n v. Cangelosi 671 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Taylor v. Oakbourne Country Club 663 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Trahan v. STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HOSPITALS 663 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Over the Edge, Inc. v. Parish of Jefferson ex rel. Yenni 662 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., supra, reversed on other grounds 960 F.2d 439 (5th Cir.1992).
Ballex v. Naccari 663 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Pryor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 663 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
is rarely appropriate for a determination based on subjective facts such as intent, motive, malice, knowledge or good faith.”
Herndon & Associates, Inc. v. Gettys 659 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Degruise v. Houma Courier Newspaper Corp. 657 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Dunn v. Potomac Ins. Co. of Illinois 657 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Perkins v. K-Mart Corp. 657 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Sanders v. Ashland Oil, Inc. 656 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Kirkland v. Riverwood Intern. USA, Inc. 658 So. 2d 715 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Jackson v. Belleau 657 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Advanced Orthopedics, LLC v. Moon 656 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Wasserman v. Life General Security Insurance Co. 656 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
As we put it in Penalber [v. Blount, ], summary judgment ‘is rarely appropriate for a determination based on subjective facts.’ Nonetheless, Louisiana courts have recognized that, while ‘rare’, summary judgment may be granted on subjective intent issues when no issue of material fact exists concerning the pertinent intent.
Blouin v. Shell Oil Co. 656 So. 2d 1118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Szodomka v. Lambert 657 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Kaufman v. Corporate Realty, Inc., (La.App.
Pitts v. Pickens 655 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Dauzat v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest 657 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Landry v. Uniroyal Chemical Co., Inc. 653 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Initially, plaintiffs contend summary judgment is not an appropriate procedural device for determining the question of intent on summary judgment, for the proposition that intent can be alleged generally, for the general proposition that summary judgment is rarely appropriate for a determination of a subjective fact such as intent.
Coleman v. Robicheaux Air Boats, Inc. 657 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Lytell v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., (LaApp.
Haydel v. Hercules Transport, Inc. 654 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Wilson v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. 654 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Kyles v. Sylvester 654 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
DeStevens v. Harsco Corp. 652 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Moore v. Esponge 651 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Peterson v. BE & K INC. OF ALABAMA 652 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Spears v. Bradford 652 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Harris v. Stimac 653 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Spears v. Bradford 652 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
HOUSTON GENERAL v. Commercial Union 649 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Labbe Serv. Garage Inc. v. LBM Distributors, Inc. 650 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Blagg v. Blanch 649 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Anderson v. Collins 648 So. 2d 1371 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995