Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Penalber v. Blount, 550 So. 2d 577.

353 citing documents.

Mikell v. Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc. 649 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Godair v. Place Vendome Corp. of America 648 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Kaufman v. Corporate Realty, Inc. 648 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Quick v. Myers Welding & Fabricating 649 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
LeBlanc v. St. Landry Parish Police Jury 647 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Favron v. Gulf States Utilities Co. 649 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Dennison v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 645 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
NAT. UNION FIRE INS. CO. v. Cagle 649 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Further, for the proposition that summary judgment is rarely appropriate for a determination of subjective facts.
Vernon v. South Central Bell Telephone Co. 649 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
our Supreme Court | reviewed the pertinent rules applicable to summary judgment cases as follows: A motion for summary judgment is properly granted only if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if any, show there is no genuine issue of
Olivier v. Boudreaux 649 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Wright v. Otis Engineering Corp. 643 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Evans v. Automotive Cas. Ins. Co. 643 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Kaplan v. Fine 643 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Giordano v. Rheem Mfg. Co. 643 So. 2d 492 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Melancon v. Trahan 645 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Smith v. OUR LADY OF LAKE HOSP. 639 So. 2d 730 La. 1994
Wallace v. Helmer Directional Drilling, Inc. 641 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc. 639 So. 2d 730 La. 1994
South Cent. Bell v. Ka-Jon Food Stores 644 So. 2d 357 La. 1994
Cormier v. Wise 638 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Holbrook v. Holliday 640 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Dupre v. Doucet 640 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Guillory v. Interstate Gas Station 640 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Davidson v. Pan American Life Insurance Co. 637 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Montalvo v. Sondes 637 So. 2d 127 La. 1994
Westmore v. Hull 636 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
In re National Society of Health 637 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
3 *694 As a general rule, a motion for summary-judgment “is rarely appropriate for a determination based on subjective facts such as intent, motive, malice, knowledge or good faith.” Neuberger, Coerver & Goins v. Times Picayune Pub.
Kidd v. Logan M. Killen, Inc. 640 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Lopinto v. Tessier 637 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
In support of his exception of no cause of action, in which the Louisiana Supreme Court held that an attorney does not owe a legal duty to his client’s adversary when acting in his Ghent’s behalf.
Henning Const. v. First Eastern Bank 635 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Green v. STATE THROUGH DOTD 637 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
In deciding whether a factual issue is material, provides: "A `fact' is material if its existence or nonexistence may be essential to plaintiff's cause of action under the applicable theory of recovery.
Green v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 637 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
In deciding whether a factual issue is material, provides: “A ‘fact’ is material if its existence or nonexistence may be essential to plaintiffs cause of action under the applicable theory of recovery.
Guilbeaux v. Martin Mills, Inc. 640 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
St. Pierre v. Frey Amusement 635 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Downtown Parking Service, Inc. v. Hyman 635 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Downtown Parking Service, Inc. v. Hyman 635 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Picard v. Zeit Exploration Co., Inc. 636 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Carnes v. Frank's Petroleum, Inc. 633 So. 2d 1295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Strahan v. State ex rel. Department of Agriculture & Forestry 633 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Lytell v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., (La.App.
Taylor v. Woodpecker Corp. 633 So. 2d 1308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Penton v. Clarkson 633 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Muse v. Katz 632 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Hanks v. Shell Oil Co. 631 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Coleman v. Sheraton Pierremont 631 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Roberts v. Orpheum Corp. 630 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Batiste v. Bevan 634 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Cooper v. Sams 628 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Barker v. Whittington 628 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
For this reason, although summary judgments are seldom appropriate for determinations based on subjective facts, (La.App.
Billiot v. Lovell 633 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Boteler v. Lake Management, Inc. 628 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993