Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Penalber v. Blount, 550 So. 2d 577.

353 citing documents.

Hopkins v. Sovereign Fire & Cas. Ins. 626 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Thornhill v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc., (La.
Montalvo v. Sondes 625 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Davis v. Manpower Intern., Inc. 623 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc. 624 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Eads Operating Company, (La.App.
Bowen v. Skillman 622 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Duet v. Lucky 621 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Simon v. Perret 619 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Smith v. Exxon Chemical Americas 619 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Eads Operating Company, (La.
Charia v. Hulse 619 So. 2d 1099 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
In brief, in support of her contention that she has stated a cause of action against Hulse both in negligence and in intentional tort.
Cantrelle v. State Farm General Insurance Co. 618 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Duncan v. Balcor Property Management, Inc. 615 So. 2d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Eads Operating Company, (La.App.
Duncan v. Balcor Property Management, Inc. 615 So. 2d 985 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Eads Operating Company, (La.App.
Crocker v. Levy 615 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Durrett v. Scott Truck and Tractor 614 So. 2d 1379 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Viator v. P & a Well Service, Inc. 615 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Potter v. FIRST FEDERAL S & L ASS'N OF SCOTLANDVILLE 615 So. 2d 318 La. 1993
Crockett v. Crockett 612 So. 2d 89 La. 1993
Wilson v. Advance Paper Co., Inc. 612 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Smith v. Our Lady of the Lake Hosp., Inc. 612 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Eads Operating Company, (La.App.
Alvarado v. Doe 613 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Liem v. Austin Power, Inc., (La.App.
Boatner v. Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center, Inc. 609 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
McKenzie v. Webster Parish School Bd. 609 So. 2d 1028 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Liem v. Austin Power, Inc., (La.App.
Bolanos v. Madary 609 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Red River Valley Bank v. Home Ins. Co. 607 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Capital Bank & (La.App.
Scott v. Pack 607 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Williams v. General Motors Corp. 607 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Benoit v. Fleet Finance, Inc. 602 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
The Louisiana Supreme Court acknowledged in Penalber v. *186 Blount, that Louisiana followed this rule as the traditional majority view.
Hartman v. Bank of Louisiana in New Orleans 602 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
MacFadyen v. Lee 601 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Bertrand v. Lala 600 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Cavin v. Elliot 597 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Cavin's contention that a motion for summary judgment is not suitable for disposition of cases that require a judicial determination of subjective facts such as motive, intent, good faith, Chelette v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., (La.App.
Simpson v. Angel 598 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Neuberger, Coerver & Goins v. Times Picayune Pub. 597 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Thomas v. Bryant 597 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Quigley v. TL James and Co., Inc. 595 So. 2d 1235 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc. 593 So. 2d 351 La. 1992
See, and authorities cited therein; Devore v. Hobart Mfg.
Williamson v. Kovac 591 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
McKinney v. South Cent. Bell Tel. Co. 590 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Carter v. BRMAP 591 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
MVG v. Lucas 590 So. 2d 1322 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Smith v. Estrade 589 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
Angel Dry Cleaners v. Dynamic International Equipment Co. 586 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
the Louisiana Supreme Court summarized the jurisprudence with respect to the granting of a motion for summary judgment as follows (at 583): A motion for summary judgment is properly granted only if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with affidavits, if an
Legros v. Norcen Exploration, Inc. 583 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Legros v. Norcen Exploration, Inc. 583 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Lytell v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., (La.App.
Morris v. People's Bank & Trust Co. 580 So. 2d 1029 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
the Supreme Court reaffirmed the majority view that an attorney does not owe a legal duty to his client's adversary when acting in his client's behalf: A non-client, therefore, generally cannot hold his adversary's attorney personally liable for either malpractice or negligent breach of a professional oblig
Ouachita Nat. v. Gulf States Land & Dev. 579 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Doe v. Smith 573 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
art. 966; Fisk v. Mathews, 525 So.2d at 226 .
Murphy v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. 570 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Liem v. Austin Power, Inc. 569 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Chelette v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., (La.App.
Gotto v. ARA Living Center 570 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1990