Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cangelosi v. OUR LADY OF LAKE REG. MED. CTR., 564 So. 2d 654.

173 citing documents.

Ja'Quarrius Ignont v. Rick Breen DBA Breen's Rapid Lube La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2025
Casey Slaydon Versus River Oaks, Inc. D/B/A River Oaks Hospital La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
Aaron Romero,et Al. v. Allied Discount Tire & Brake,inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
-66 (La.1989)(internal citations omitted), on rehearing, our supreme court stated: [T]he doctrine of res ipsa loquitur (the thing speaks for itself) permits the inference of negligence on the part of the defendant from the circumstances surrounding the injury.
Genevieve Moore v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and Agriculture and Mechanical College O/B/O Lsu Health … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Stephen Swarthout v. Roger Driggers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Samuel F. Patterson, III v. Darryl W. Peterson, MD and Lammico Insurance Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2020
Medical Review Panel Kevin Jordan (D) v. Community Care Hospital, J. Robert Barnes, M.D. and Anwar Ismail, M.D. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Perdomo v. City of Kenner 258 So. 3d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
India Sam, as Curatrix for Jessica Charles v. Genesis Behavioral Hospital, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Sam v. Genesis Behavioral Hosp., Inc. 255 So. 3d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Salvador v. Main St. Family Pharmacy, L.L.C. 251 So. 3d 1107 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
9/5/07), , 41 ; *1113 Cangelosi v. Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center , , 665 (La.
Lee v. Pull-A-Part of New Orleans W., LLC 250 So. 3d 349 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2018
Jacqueline J. Gaspard v. Horace Mann Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Gaspard v. Horace Mann Ins. Co. 247 So. 3d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Mary Mason v. Burlington Coat Factory of Louisiana, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Mazella Shahan Flournoy v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Flournoy v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc. 222 So. 3d 103 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Mitchell v. Aaron's Rentals 218 So. 3d 167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Dortch v. Jane Doe & Chrysler Group, LLC 217 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
-66 (La.1989)(on rehearing).
Ryan v. Case New Holland, Inc. 211 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Escobar v. Cajun Operating Co. 209 So. 3d 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Mary Elizabeth Granger v. B & B Farms of Mamou, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Granger v. B & B Farms of Mamou, Inc. 199 So. 3d 1145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Thompson v. Mangham Home Care, Inc. 198 So. 3d 221 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Linda Marie Searile v. Ville Platte Medical Center, LLC D/B/A Mercy Regional Medical Center La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Ctr., -66 (La.1990) (on rehearing) (explaining that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur “merely assists the plaintiff in presenting a 13 prima facie case of negligence when direct evidence is not available” and that “[i]n order to utilize the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur
Searile v. Ville Platte Medical Center, LLC 194 So. 3d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Ctr., -66 (La.1990) (on rehearing) (explaining that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur "merely assists the plaintiff in presenting a [uprima facie case of negligence when direct evidence is not available” and that “[i]n order to utilize the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur the plaintiff must establish a foundation of facts
Ledet ex rel. Ledet v. Robinson Helicopter Co. 195 So. 3d 89 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Penn v. Carepoint Partners of Louisiana, L.L.C. 181 So. 3d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Show & Tell of New Orleans, L.L.C. v. Fellowship Missionary Baptist Church 171 So. 3d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Basil Fisher v. Catahoula Parish Police Jury La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Fisher v. Catahoula Parish Police Jury 165 So. 3d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Sullivan v. City of Baton Rouge 170 So. 3d 186 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Temes v. Manitowoc Corp. 181 So. 3d 733 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
3 Cir.1993), writ denied, 93-2988 (La.1/28/94), , 10 Circumstantial evidence is evidence of fact, from which the fact sought to be proven may be inferred.
Blake v. City of Port Allen 167 So. 3d 781 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Southpark Community Hospital, LLC v. Southpark Acquisition Company,llc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Valence v. Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 128 So. 3d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Further, application of the res ipsa doctrine “does not relieve the plaintiff of the ultimate burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence all of the elements necessary for recovery.”
Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc. 111 So. 3d 508 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
See Rando, p. 33, 16 So.3d at 1089 , and Benjamin ex rel.
Richard v. Parish Anesthesia Associates, Ltd. 106 So. 3d 730 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
The district court committed legal error by finding negligence on the part of the Appellants based on circumstan *734 tial evidence alone even though Mr. Richard’s injury was of a kind which can occur in the absence of negligence in contradiction to the Supreme Court’s holding in Cangolosi [Cangelosi ] v. Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center, 8.
Ralph Mayes v. Wausau Underwriters Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Res Ipsa Loquitur Plaintiff argues that res ipsa loquitur5 should apply and cites the Louisiana Supreme Court’s decision of Pear v. LaBiche’s, Inc., 5 provides: The principle of res ipsa loquitur is a rule of circumstantial evidence that infers negligence on the part of defendants because the facts of the case indicate that the negligence of the def
Mayes v. Wausau Underwriters Insurance Co. 104 So. 3d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
provides: The principle of res ipsa loquitur is a rule of circumstantial evidence that infers negligence on the part of defendants because the facts of the case indicate that the negligence of the defendant is the probable cause o
Cavet v. Louisiana Extended Care Hospital 92 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Jennifer Lopez v. Safeway Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
the court held that “[t]hese facts are clearly sufficient to establish as more probable than not the reasonable inference that Smith or someone authorized by him was driving the car at the time of the accident.” Smith, 738 So.2d at 133.
Kennedy v. Fagan 92 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Dotie v. Safeway Insurance Co. of Louisiana 87 So. 3d 942 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Powell v. Chabanais Concrete Pumping, Inc. 82 So. 3d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Benjamin v. Housing Authority of New Orleans, 04-1058, p. 5 (La.12/1/04)
Michael Smith, Et Ux. v. St. Landry Parish Solid Waste Disposal District La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Smith v. St. Landry Parish Solid Waste Disposal District 81 So. 3d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Simmons v. Christus Schumpert Medical Center 71 So. 3d 407 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Dustin Russell v. H & H Metal Contractors, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Russell v. H & H Metal Contractors, Inc. 65 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011