Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cangelosi v. OUR LADY OF LAKE REG. MED. CTR., 564 So. 2d 654.

173 citing documents.

Johnson v. Morehouse General Hospital 63 So. 3d 87 La. 2011
Randy Williams v. Iesi-La Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Benjamin v. Housing Authority of New Orleans, 04-1058, p. 5 (La.12/1/04)
Nicholson v. Horseshoe Entertainment 58 So. 3d 565 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
Linnear v. CenterPoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy, 2006-3030 (La.9/5/07), .
Kevin Campbell, Et Ux. v. Coast Concrete Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Benjamin v. Housing Authority of New Orleans, 04-1058, p. 5 (La.12/1/04)
Campbell v. Coast Concrete Services, Inc. 51 So. 3d 168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Benjamin v. Housing Authority of New Orleans, 04-1058, p. 5 (La.12/1/04)
Thomas v. Comfort Center of Monroe, LA, Inc. 48 So. 3d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Hebert v. Plaquemine Caring, L.L.C. 43 So. 3d 239 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co. v. Hayden 41 So. 3d 621 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
Trahan v. Guidry 34 So. 3d 1169 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
David Trahan v. Robert Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Reilly v. SPINAZZE 34 So. 3d 1069 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Shuff v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 32 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Holmes v. Hicks 24 So. 3d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Short v. Plantation Management Corporation, XXXX-XXXX at p. 9, ; (La.
Williams v. Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc. 22 So. 3d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Owen v. Smith 16 So. 3d 1274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
PINEGAR v. Harris 20 So. 3d 1081 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc. 16 So. 3d 1065 La. 2009
Boudreaux v. American Insurance Co., 262 La.
Arnold v. Ouachita Parish Fire Department 12 So. 3d 461 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
Tim Dronette v. Shetler Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Dronette v. Shelter Ins. Co. 998 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Riggs v. OPELOUSAS GENERAL HOSP. TRUST 997 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
-66 (La.1989) (citations and footnotes omitted)(emphasis ours).
Cora Riggs v. Opelousas General Hospital Trust Authority La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
-66 (La.1989)(citations and footnotes omitted)(emphasis ours).
Zapalowski v. Campbell 988 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Ruiz v. Guette 983 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
the Louisiana Supreme Court explained that the plaintiff fails to prove that, more probably than not, the injury was the result of negligence, where it is equally plausible that the defendant's negligence caused the injury as it is that the injury was caused otherwise.
Clint Desoto v. Ford Motor Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Desoto v. Ford Motor Co. 975 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
Little v. Pou 975 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Hinson v. *675 The Glen Oak, supra; (La.App.
Hebert v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 974 So. 2d 635 La. 2008
Broussard v. Voorhies 970 So. 2d 1038 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Linnear v. CENTERPOINT ENERGY ENTEX/RELIANT 966 So. 2d 36 La. 2007
As explained below, the appellate court's errors were its misapplication of res ipsa loquitur to a (on rehearing) regarding the standard to be used by the trial court in determining whether to give a res ipsa loquitur instruction to the jury.
Hanks v. Entergy Corp. 944 So. 2d 564 La. 2006
Lawson v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America 938 So. 2d 35 La. 2006
Ball v. CHARTER FOREST BEHAV. HEALTH SYSTEM 938 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Center, Hinson v. The Glen Oak, supra.
Blankenship v. Ochsner Clinic Foundation 940 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
667 n. 11 (La.1989) ( on reh'g ), the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the applicability of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in medical malpractice cases.
Amos v. LOUISIANA MEDICAL MUT. INS. CO. 936 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Linnear v. Centerpoint Energy Entex/Reliant Energy 945 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Salvant v. State 935 So. 2d 646 La. 2006
Criticized Joseph v. Crossing II, L.L.C. 934 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
(citations and footnotes omitted) We are not persuaded by plaintiffs argument that the presumption of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur should be *878 applied in this matter.
Edward Trent, Jr. v. Ppg Industries, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Edward Trent, Jr. v. Ppg Industries, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Edward Trent, Jr. v. Ppg Industries, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Trent v. PPG Industries, Inc. 930 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Hanks v. Entergy Corp. 921 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
citing W. Prosser & W. Keeton, The Law of Torts, § 39, at 242 (5th Ed.1984).
Henderson v. HOMER MEMORIAL HOSP. 920 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Lawrence Menard and Patricia Menard v. Michael R. Holland, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
2 (citations omitted): The principle of res ipsa loquitur is a rule of circumstantial evidence that infers negligence o
Menard v. Holland 919 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
(citations omitted): The principle of res ipsa loquitur is a rule of circumstantial evidence that infers negligence on the part of defendan
Gisclair v. Bonneval 928 So. 2d 39 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Pat Swido and Tommie Swido v. Lafayette Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Swido v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 916 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Tucker v. Sullivan 913 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
The plaintiff, however, does not have to conclusively exclude all other possible explanations for his injuries, because the standard of proof is not beyond a reasonable doubt.”