Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 600 So. 2d 1319.

300 citing documents.

State v. Burke 103 So. 3d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
State v. Joyner 107 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
State v. Winston 100 So. 3d 332 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
State v. Kirk 98 So. 3d 934 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
State v. Duncan 91 So. 3d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the Imweight of the evidence.” at 1324.
State v. Anderson 85 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
“[A] reviewing |7court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
State v. Ott 80 So. 3d 1280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Wyatt 83 So. 3d 131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
State v. Cooks 81 So. 3d 932 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
State v. Rubens 83 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
State v. Hawkins 78 So. 3d 293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the | f,conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
State v. LeBlanc 76 So. 3d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the -witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
State v. Sims 75 So. 3d 478 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
State v. Payton 68 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or | i2whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
State v. McMillian 65 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
State of Louisiana v. A. D. L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
State v. A.D.L. 64 So. 3d 448 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2011
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
State of Louisiana v. Alvin Donald Parker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
State v. Wells 64 So. 3d 303 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
State v. Green 62 So. 3d 229 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
State v. Brown 56 So. 3d 1095 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324 (La.1992).
State v. Kelly 54 So. 3d 1159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
It is well-settled that an appellate court “is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” Mussall, 523 So.2d at 1311
State v. Monroe 53 So. 3d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. B. M. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
State v. Berry 44 So. 3d 819 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
State v. Black 41 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
State v. DOWL 39 So. 3d 754 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Paul Jacoby Broussard La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Broussard 33 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State of Louisiana v. Wilkes Laird La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
“In making such a determination, a reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
State v. Laird 30 So. 3d 1167 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
“In making such a determination, a reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
State v. Kelly 60 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Johnson 22 So. 3d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Dowell 17 So. 3d 523 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Robinson 19 So. 3d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“A reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” (La.
State v. Harrison 16 So. 3d 447 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Holland 13 So. 3d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
State v. Parker 11 So. 3d 534 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
State v. Riley 10 So. 3d 1232 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Fields 10 So. 3d 350 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Rabun 5 So. 3d 1060 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
State v. Brown 7 So. 3d 1238 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Vincent 7 So. 3d 1243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
State v. Ambeau 6 So. 3d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
State v. Lawrence 5 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
“[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
State v. Sparkman 5 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2009
State v. Boyd 999 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Hotard 994 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
State v. Conner 996 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
State v. Agee 990 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008