DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 600 So. 2d 1319.

300 citing documents.

  • State v. Jackson 987 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Shaw 987 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Calvert 986 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. TROQUILLE 986 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
  • State v. Forbs 983 So. 2d 954 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Simmons 983 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Williams 977 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • State v. Lopez 971 So. 2d 416 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Galindo 968 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Mitchell 958 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
  • State v. Davis 958 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Allen 954 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Dunbar 950 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
  • State v. Love 947 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State of Louisiana v. Timothy E. Robertson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Robertson 931 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Ruiz 931 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Gregory John Ruiz La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Desmond Joseph Senegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Senegal 931 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
  • State v. Cooper 935 So. 2d 194 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • State v. Cuccia 933 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
  • State v. Trackling 930 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
  • State v. Phillips 905 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
  • State v. Clark 904 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    “[A] reviewing-court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Sykes 900 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
  • State v. Lacoste 896 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
  • State v. Harris 892 So. 2d 1238 La. 2005
    1555 , 131 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995)(nolle prosequi); (rev'd)(life); (rev'd)(life); (aff'd), new penalty phase order by district court, review denied, 95-0262 (La.4/26/96), (life); (rev'd)(life); (rev'd)(acquitted); (rev'd)(life); (rev'd)(manslaughter); State ex rel.
  • State v. Jones 891 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Hart 881 So. 2d 1237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
  • State v. Bertrand 874 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Genter 872 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
  • State v. Pierre 869 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Ferrand 866 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
  • State v. Wallace 862 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. LeBlanc 862 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Helou 857 So. 2d 1024 La. 2003
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
  • State v. Lebreton 859 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Toups 859 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight *772 of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Sylvia 845 So. 2d 358 La. 2003
  • State v. Lee 844 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Price 842 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Roberts 844 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Gaddis 839 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
  • State v. Thomas 841 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
  • State v. Crawford 848 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Alvey 839 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Davis 839 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
  • State v. Weber 834 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Mussall, 523 So.2d at 1311 .
  • State v. Armstead 832 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”