DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 600 So. 2d 1319.

300 citing documents.

  • State v. Coleman 831 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    Mussall, supra, at 1311 .
  • State v. Toups 833 So. 2d 910 La. 2002
  • State v. Coleman 830 So. 2d 341 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Major 829 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Hurst 828 So. 2d 1165 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Clark 828 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Lee 826 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Juarbe 824 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. Porter , 2000-2286, p. 13, 806 So.2d at 73
  • State v. Robinson 820 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Sellers 818 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Plaisance 811 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Huckabay 809 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Howard 805 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Porter 806 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Moses 806 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of | fithe evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Franklin 803 So. 2d 1057 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Spencer 802 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Brealy 800 So. 2d 1116 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Mussall, supra, at 1311 .
  • State v. Offray 797 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Moore 797 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Vicks 798 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Allen 793 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Alvarez 792 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Washington 793 So. 2d 376 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Bloodworth 790 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Holmes 791 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Scott, 709 So.2d at 343 ().
  • State v. Tapp 788 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witness or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Knight 794 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Baudier 789 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it | fibelieves the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Toups 792 So. 2d 18 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Allen 794 So. 2d 25 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Harris 787 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Collins 787 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Scott , 97-0028 at pp. 8-9, 709 So.2d at 343
  • State v. Hebert 787 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Flowers 782 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Harrison 782 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.”
  • State v. Carter 779 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Morgan 779 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Hodge 781 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Boudreaux 777 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witness or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. McZeal 779 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide -whether it believes the witnesses or whether the | ^conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Martin 788 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Carter 773 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Marshall 774 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Brown 773 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” State v. Scott, 709 So.2d at 341
  • State v. Jones 769 So. 2d 28 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Mims 769 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • State v. Bullock 767 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    “[A] reviewing court is not called upon to decide whether it believes the witnesses or whether the conviction is contrary to the weight of the evidence.” at 1324.
  • State v. Woodfork 764 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000