Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Byrd, 568 So. 2d 554.

64 citing documents.

State of Louisiana Versus Billy Lampton La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
State Of Louisiana v. Rudolph Lurding La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238, 103 S. Ct. 2317, 2332, 76 L. Ed. 2d 527 ( 1983); ( La.
State Of Louisiana v. David H. Brown (Parish of Lafourche) Convictions Affirmed; Death Sentences Reversed; Case Remanded For … La. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Carlshane Dennis La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Terrell Michael Williams And Rico Jones La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
State of Louisiana Versus Jakorey Williams La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
Shiell, 204 So.3d at 1217 ( (La.
State v. Every 274 So. 3d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
State v. Byrd , , 559 (La.
State of Louisiana v. James G. Buck La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
the supreme court noted that where “misrepresentations or omissions are inadvertent or negligent, the warrant will be retested for probable cause after supplying that which had been omitted or striking that which had been misrepresented.” Defendant argues that he proved Ms. Pate’s extreme intoxication
State of Louisiana v. Jeffrey Clark 220 So. 3d 583 La. 2016
State v. Shiell 204 So. 3d 1213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Steve Duane Williams -Aka- Ayaz Sutaria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
2317, 2332, 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
State v. Williams 201 So. 3d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
2317, 2332 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
State v. Mitchell 182 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
State v. Powell 151 So. 3d 890 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
The judge or magistrate issuing the warrant must “make a practical, common sense decision whether, given all of the circumstances set forth in the affidavit, there is a fair probability that evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.” State v. Green, 02-1022, p. 7 (La.12/4/02), ().
State v. Jones 99 So. 3d 1061 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State of Louisiana v. Jamey L. Everett La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
2317, 2332, 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
State v. Everett 89 So. 3d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
2317, 2332 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
State v. Williams 87 So. 3d 949 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
State v. Friday 73 So. 3d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
2317, 2332 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983)
State v. Williams 53 So. 3d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Brown, 93-2089 (La.App.
State v. Brown 32 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State v. Lewis 988 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
In addition to confer *791 ring similar protections to the Fourth Amendment, Article 1, § 5 of the Louisiana Constitution 2 expands the scope of protection, affording Louisiana citizens standing to contest the illegality of a search or seizure to “any person adversely affected.” 3 See State v. Gant, 93-2895 (La.5/20/94)
State v. NIONS 952 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
State v. Stephens 917 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
State v. Gant, 93-2895 (La.5/20/94)
State v. Brown 907 So. 2d 1 La. 2005
State v. Peterson 868 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State of Louisiana v. James R. Skipper La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
in support of the assertion that if the reliability of a confidential informant has not been established, as in the instant matter, then probable cause fails.
State v. Skipper 861 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
in support of the assertion that if the reliability of a confidential informant has not been established, as in the instant matter, then probable cause fails.
State v. Williams 859 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
State v. Lipton 857 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
2317 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 ; (La.
State v. McLeod 843 So. 2d 1268 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
State v. Rando 848 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Robertson 840 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
State v. Green 831 So. 2d 962 La. 2002
State v. Cho 831 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Harry 823 So. 2d 987 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
State v. Lewis 782 So. 2d 662 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Profit 778 So. 2d 1127 La. 2001
State v. Adams 779 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. *118 Brown, 93-2089 (La.App.
State v. Hodge 781 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
State v. Casey 775 So. 2d 1022 La. 2000
State v. Young 751 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Pennison 763 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Blanchard 749 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
2317, 2322-2323 , 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983); (La.
State v. Brooks 745 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Smith, 95-1787, p. 5 (La.App.
State v. Smith 734 So. 2d 826 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Mitchell 731 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
State v. Brown, 93-2089 (La.App.
State v. Bailey 713 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
The Louisiana Supreme Court followed the Gates approach *598
State v. Ceasar 700 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State v. Foret 685 So. 2d 210 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by