Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lirette v. State Farm Ins. Co., 563 So. 2d 850.

225 citing documents.

Hooper v. LA. DEPT. OF AGR. AND FORESTRY 960 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Derrick Barr v. State Farm Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Hanks v. Entergy Corp. 944 So. 2d 564 La. 2006
Yates v. Elmer 948 So. 2d 1092 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Harrison v. Cooper 944 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Horstmann v. Farber 944 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
where the Louisiana Supreme Court held that the "manifest error-clearly wrong" standard of review demands great deference to the trier of fact's findings regarding the credibility of witnesses, because "only the fact finder can be aware of the variations in demeanor and tone of voice that bear so heavi
Albert Harper v. Grand Casino Coushatta La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Harper v. Grand Casino Coushatta 940 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Mel McDaniel v. Carencro Lions Club La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
McDaniel v. Carencro Lions Club 934 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Magee v. Abek, Inc. 934 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Bujol v. Entergy Services, Inc. 922 So. 2d 1113 La. 2006
Meneses v. IFCO Systems, Inc. 923 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Zimko v. American Cyanamid 905 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Co., and Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
Costales v. Turner Industries 905 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
Dominici v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., (La.App.
Henry v. Henry 904 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Long v. Long 895 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Sandres J. Guidry v. Dwight Manuel, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Co., cert denied, 510 U.S. 1114, 114 S.Ct.
Guidry v. Dwight Manuel, Inc. 877 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Green v. K-Mart Corp. 874 So. 2d 838 La. 2004
Riley v. Salley 874 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Peters v. Harmsen 879 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Moore v. Kenilworth/Kailas Properties 865 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Secret Cove, LLC v. Thomas 862 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Jake Dixon, Et Ux. v. Daniel Butane Gas Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Dixon v. Daniel Butane Gas Inc. 858 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Ivy v. V's Holding Co. 859 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Robinson v. Franklin 851 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
Bradley v. ConAgra Poultry Co. 843 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Parish Nat. Bank v. Ott 841 So. 2d 749 La. 2003
Amoco Production Co. v. Texaco, Inc. 838 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
Co., -53 (La.1990) (citations omitted).
Bonnette v. Conoco, Inc. 837 So. 2d 1219 La. 2003
Millet v. Evangeline Health Care, Inc. 839 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
Burdette v. Drushell 837 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Curole v. Curole 848 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
Allain v. Martco Partnership 828 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Glass v. Magnolia School, Inc. 815 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
[10] Rogers v. Roch, 95-242, p. 16 (La.App.
Williams v. Rubicon, Inc. 808 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Corbello v. Iowa Production 806 So. 2d 32 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Co., -53 (La.1990) (citations omitted).
Dumas v. City of New Orleans 803 So. 2d 1001 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Langley v. Larco Environmental Services, Inc. 798 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Brandt v. Engle 791 So. 2d 614 La. 2001
Co., ("where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of fact should not be disturbed upon review, even though the appellate court may feel that its own evaluations and inferences are reasonable").
Lasyone v. Kansas City Southern RR 786 So. 2d 682 La. 2001
Petre v. State Ex Rel. DOTD 775 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Kottle v. Provident Life and Acc. Ins. Co. 775 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Co., Townsend v. Westinghouse Elevator Corp., 25,966 (La.
Touchard v. Slemco Electric Foundation 769 So. 2d 1200 La. 2000
Fusilier v. Dauterive 759 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Natchitoches Parish Port Commission v. Deblieux & Kelley, Inc. 760 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Co., -53 (La.1990) (citations omitted) (emphasis added).
Scoggins v. Frederick 744 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Because Mr. Murray was an expert witness, -853 (La.1990) is applicable: It is well settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a finding of fact by a trial court or a jury in the absence of "manifest error" or unless it is "clearly wrong," and where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of
Sportsman Store v. Sonitrol SEC. Systems 748 So. 2d 417 La. 1999