Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, 567 So. 2d 1081.

125 citing documents.

  • Dennis v. Wiley 22 So. 3d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    see also Barrino v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Bd., 96-1824 (La.App.
  • Air Supply, Inc. v. Wahlder 10 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Moresi v. State, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
  • Air Supply, Inc. v. Michael M. Wahlder La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Moresi v. State, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
  • Barringer v. Robertson 994 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    See Moresi v. State, Through Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries, (La.
  • Wilson v. Davis 991 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Moresi v. State through Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries
  • RIVERSIDE TRANSPORTATION INC. v. Burke 978 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    3/20/98), , (citing Moresi v. State, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, (La.
  • Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 975 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Bonnette v. Conoco, Inc., 2001-2767 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Coutee v. Beurlot 964 So. 2d 304 La. 2007
    [5] As these alleged damages are unaccompanied by physical injury and are insufficient to show an "especial likelihood of genuine and serious mental distress, arising from the special circumstances, which serves as a guarantee that the claim is not spurious[,]" even recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress is inappropriate.
  • Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp. 935 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Bonnette v. Conoco, Inc., 2001-2767 (La.1/28/03), .
  • Doe v. Smith 913 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
  • Boudreaux v. State, Department of Transportation 906 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    3rd Cir.6/20/01), , writs denied, 01-2770, 01-2783 (La.1/4/02), , 213 (quoting Moresi v. State Through Department of Wildlife & Fisheries, ).
  • Boudreaux v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRAN. AND DEV. 906 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    3rd Cir.6/20/01), , writs denied, 01-2770, 01-2783 (La.1/4/02), , 213 (quoting Moresi v. State Through Department of Wildlife & Fisheries, ).
  • Howard v. Union Carbide Corp. 897 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Bonnette v. Conoco, 02-1767 (La.1/28/03), , citing Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries
  • Doe v. Breedlove 906 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Moresi v. State, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
  • Doe v. Dunn 890 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Moresi v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, Succession of Harvey v. Dietzen, 97-2815 (La.App.
  • Distinguished Bonnette v. Conoco, Inc. 837 So. 2d 1219 La. 2003
    In Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, this court held that a defendant will generally not be held liable where his conduct is merely negligent and causes only emotional injury unaccompanied by physical injury.
  • Boudreaux v. STATE, DOTD 815 So. 2d 7 La. 2002
  • Bonnette v. Conoco, Inc. 801 So. 2d 501 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    To support their arguments, Conoco relies on Moresi v. State, Through Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
  • Lann v. Davis 793 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • Young v. First National Bank of Shreveport 794 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Moresi v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, Beis v. Bowers, 94-0178 (La.App.
  • Johnson v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport 792 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    In support of this argument, the Defendants cite Moresi v. State Through Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, and Dumas v. Angus Chem.
  • Jackson v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Corrs. 785 So. 2d 803 La. 2001
    As this Court discussed in Moresi v. State, Through Dep't of Wildlife and Fisheries, Harlow established a two part test under which a public official may claim his conduct is protected by qualified immunity: First, the court must look to currently applicable law and determine whether the law was clearly established at the time the action in question occurred.
  • INVESTMENT MGMT. SVCS., INC. v. Village of Folsom 808 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • Richardson v. Home Depot USA 808 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Moresi v. State, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, quoting the Restatement of Torts (2d) § 46(1).
  • Touchard v. Slemco Electric Foundation 769 So. 2d 1200 La. 2000
    The court of appeal concluded that there was no indication that Ms. Touchard's pre-existing mental condition was not genuine; and further concluded that "special circumstances" existed discounting any doubt that her claim was spurious, based on our decision in Moresi v. State, Through Dep't of Wildlife and Fisheries
  • State v. Smith 766 So. 2d 501 La. 2000
    (emphasis in original); see also, -65 (La.1993); Moresi v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, -1093 (La.
  • Bacas v. Falgoust 760 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    Moresi v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, -96 (La.1990).
  • Sommer v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. DEVELOPMENT 758 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • Sommer v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 758 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • McCoy v. City of Monroe 747 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Arledge v. Sherrill, supra .
  • Touchard v. Slemco Electric Foundation 745 So. 2d 1232 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Moresi v. State, through Dep’t of Wildlife and Fisheries
  • State v. Waters 751 So. 2d 290 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Moresi v. State, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, -87 (La.1990).
  • Arledge v. Sherrill 738 So. 2d 1215 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Moresi v. State, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
  • Ortego v. Landry 746 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    provides what a plaintiff must show for a successful § 1983 claim, to-wit: To recover under Sec.1983, a plaintiff must allege and prove two essential elements.
  • Keller v. McElveen 744 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    See Moresi v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries
  • Falcon v. Our Lady of Lake Hosp., Inc. 729 So. 2d 1169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • Lilley v. BOARD OF SUP'RS OF STATE UNIV. 735 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    2113 , 138 L.Ed.2d 560 (1997)
  • Terrebonne Parish Consolidated Government v. Houma Municipal Fire & Police Civil Service Board 729 So. 2d 1082 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • Arco Oil & Gas Co. v. DeShazer 728 So. 2d 841 La. 1999
    Moresi v. State, Through Dept. Of Wildlife & Fisheries
  • Dumas v. Angus Chemical Co. 728 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
  • Dragon v. Cooper/T. Smith Stevedoring 726 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    Moresi v. State, Through Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
  • Vallier v. Louisiana Health Systems, Inc. 722 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    The court in Vallery recognized that "our *420 Supreme Court limited recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress"in the seminal case of Moresi v. State, Through Department of Wildlife & Fisheries
  • Harrison v. State 721 So. 2d 458 La. 1998
    State v. Moreno, supra at 65 (citing Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries, ) (citing U.S. v. Cortez, 449 U.S. 411, 417 , 101 S.Ct.
  • Succession of Harvey v. Dietzen 716 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    Moresi v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, -96 (La.
  • Crockett v. Cardona 713 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    Moresi v. State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Wildlife & Fisheries, (clarifying the circumstances where mental distress damages may be recovered because of the likelihood of emotional distress).
  • Walker v. Allen Parish Health Unit 711 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
  • McVay v. Delchamps, Inc. 707 So. 2d 90 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    The Supreme Court, cited the following cases for this proposition: Pecoraro v. Kopanica, 173 So.
  • Lambert v. RIVERBOAT GAMING ENFORC. DIV. 706 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Moresi v. State, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
  • Powell v. Brookshire's Grocery Co., Inc. 705 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    Moresi v. State, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Barrino v. East Baton Rouge Parish School Board, supra; Norred v. Radisson Hotel Corporation, supra.
  • Webb v. Theriot 704 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997