DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Moresi v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, 567 So. 2d 1081.

125 citing documents.

  • Smith v. Ouachita Parish School Bd. 702 So. 2d 727 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • Barrino v. E. BATON ROUGE SCHOOL BD. 697 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
    Moresi v. State, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
  • Varnado v. Department of Employment and Training 687 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    1908 , 68 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981); Johnson v. Morel, 876 F.2d 477 (5th Cir.1989); Moresi v. State, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, (La.App.
  • Landrum v. Board of Com'rs 685 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    Based on this finding, and because Louisiana law does not recognize an independent tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress, Moresi v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, -96 (La.1990), no cause of action has been stated for infliction of emotional distress.
  • Knapper v. Connick 681 So. 2d 944 La. 1996
    [9] In Moresi v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, we dealt with the availability of a qualified immunity for state game wardens from prosecution under 42 U.S.C.
  • Louisiana Farms v. LA. Dept. of Wildlife 685 So. 2d 1086 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Moresi v. Dept. Of Wildlife & Fisheries, citing Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 , 102 S.Ct.
  • Young v. St. Landry Parish School Bd. 673 So. 2d 1272 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    In Moresi v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, (La.
  • Sanders v. Spector 673 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    In Moresi v. State, through Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries, a suit, inter alia for mental damages allegedly sustained by hunters who were detained and searched by state wildlife agents, the Louisiana Supreme Court held: This case does not present a situation in which recovery for mental distress may be based upon a breach of contract or a separate tort such as
  • Christian v. Fontenot 672 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    the Louisiana Supreme Court, interpreting Harlow , developed its own two-part test.
  • Norred v. Radisson Hotel Corp. 665 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    Moresi v. State, Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, Scamardo v. Dunaway, 94-545, p. 6 (La.App.
  • Theriot v. STATE, DEPT. OF WILDLIFE & FISHERIES 661 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    3d Cir.1989), rev'd on other grounds, (La.
  • Scamardo v. Dunaway 650 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
  • Amato v. Office of Com'r of Securities 644 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    Moresi v. Department of Wildlife & Fisheries, quoting Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 , 102 S.Ct.
  • Slaydon v. State ex rel. Department of Wildlife & Fisheries 636 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    (The Louisiana agents in Moresi v. Wildlife & Fisheries, had federal commissions.)
  • State v. McHugh 630 So. 2d 1259 La. 1994
    State v. Moreno, supra; Moresi v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, (La.
  • Vallery v. Southern Baptist Hosp. 630 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    our Supreme Court limited recovery for negligent infliction of emotional distress to cases involving the "especial likelihood of genuine and serious mental distress, arising from the special circumstances, which serves as a guarantee that the claim is not spurious."
  • Eberhardt v. Levasseur 630 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    Moresi v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries
  • State v. Moreno 619 So. 2d 62 La. 1993
    Moresi v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, citing authorities.
  • Straughan v. Ahmed 618 So. 2d 1225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
  • Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc. v. Hymel 610 So. 2d 195 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    The trial court held Mrs. Hymel did not introduce sufficient evidence to recover either item, citing Moresi v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, which holds in pertinent part: Under the general rule followed by the great majority of jurisdictions, if the defendant's conduct is merely negligent and causes only mental disturbance, without accompanying physical injury, illness *200 or other physical consequences, the defendant is not liable for such em
  • Lamartiniere v. Allstate Insurance Co. 597 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    In Moresi v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, the supreme court stated that damages are awardable to an individual for injuries or loss caused by this type of privacy invasion.
  • State v. McHugh 598 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Moresi v. Department of Wildlife & Fisheries, (La.
  • Kyle v. Civil Service Com'n 588 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Moresi v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries
  • White v. Monsanto Co. 585 So. 2d 1205 La. 1991
    See also this court's decision in Moresi v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries, which distinguished between the general rule of recovery for the intentional infliction of mental distress and the general rule of no recovery for emotional disturbance unaccompanied by physical injury, caused by mere negligence unless arising under special circumstances.
  • Guillory v. Arceneaux 580 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    Moresi v. Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries