DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Wilson v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR., 576 So. 2d 490.

28 citing documents.

  • Explained Leon Boyd v. Rapides Parish Sheriff's Department La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
    In Kite, ___So.3d at___, the court stated:
  • Sharon Tisdale v. David Hedrick As Sheriff Of Concordia Parish And Matthew Morgan La. 2023
    9/9/97), Wilson v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections, (La.
  • Michel Jackson Miller, Individually And As Natural Tutrix Of Her Minor Son v. The State Of Louisiana, Department … La. 2021
    See Wilson v. State through Dept. of Public Safety & Corrections, (La.
  • Nelwin Rider v. Jack Stansberry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    (footnote omitted) (alteration in original), the supreme court supplied the test applying in situations where a victim, injured by an escaped prisoner, sues the authorities responsible for that prisoner being at large: As a general proposition, [t]he determination of liability in
  • Rider v. Stansberry 87 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    (footnote omitted) (alteration in original), the supreme court supplied the test applying in situations where a victim, injured by an escaped prisoner, sues the authorities responsible for that prisoner being at large: As a general proposition, [t]he determination of liability in a negligence case usual
  • Scheurmann v. Foti 894 So. 2d 1199 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    The Louisiana Supreme Court considered custodial liability for damages caused by an escaped prisoner in Wilson v. Dept. of Public Safety & Corr.
  • Mesh v. Lundy 850 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    IsAnother case cited by defendant is Wilson v. State, Department of Public Safety & Corrections, in which plaintiffs were robbed by Robert Downs as they arrived home to their trailer located several miles from the prison where Downs had been confined.
  • Gregor v. Argenot Great Cent. Ins. Co. 851 So. 2d 959 La. 2003
  • Perkins v. Entergy Corp. 756 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    See Fowler, 556 So.2d at 4 and Wilson v. State, Department of Public Safety and Corrections
  • Cormier v. THE Ins. Co. 745 So. 2d 1 La. 1999
    [4] See Thompson v. State, 97-0293 (La.10/31/97); , [State is not insurer of the safety of its citizens]; Lambert v. Pepsico, Inc., 96-0648 (La.App.
  • Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank 738 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Negligence of Vernon Parish Sheriff Sheriff Howard's negligence for allowing the trustees, Boyd and Strickland, to escape while taking out the trash, is analyzed under Wilson v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections
  • Marceaux v. Gibbs 699 So. 2d 1065 La. 1997
    custodial liability Wilson v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections, allowed this court the first opportunity to set forth the test which should be applied when the victim of a crime committed by an escapee sues prison authorities for damages inflicted by the escaped prisoner.
  • Rhodes v. State Through DOTD 684 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    Wilson v. State, Department of Public Safety and Corrections, (La.
  • Nicholson v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury 685 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Wilson v. Dept. of Public Safety & Corrections, reh.
  • Marceaux v. Gibbs 680 So. 2d 1189 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    Wilson v. State Through Dept. of Public Safety & Corr.
  • Rice v. ABC Ins. Co. 672 So. 2d 1109 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • Freeman v. Julia Place Ltd. Partners 663 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    Wilson v. Dept. of Public Safety & Corrections, reh.
  • Durapau v. Jenkins 656 So. 2d 1067 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    a case involving an armed robbery committed by an escaping *1070 convict thirteen days after breaking out of prison.
  • Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp. 646 So. 2d 318 La. 1994
    1993); Thomas C. Galligan, Jr., A Primer on the Patterns of Negligence, 53 La.L.Rev.
  • Wiggins on Behalf of Wiggins v. Ledet 643 So. 2d 797 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    Wilson v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections
  • Polk v. Blanque 633 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    2nd Cir.1993); plaintiff cannot withstand a motion for summary judgment absent some proof that these defendants' actions were a cause in fact of her injury.
  • Clement v. Griffin 634 So. 2d 412 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    Although legal causation is a question for the trier of fact, Wilson v. State, Dept of Public Safety, the context of the interrogatory in the instant case indicates that the trial judge was seeking a decision on whether a manufacturing defect in the tire was a cause-in-fact of the accident, not a legal cause.
  • Aetna Life and Cas. Co. v. Solloway 630 So. 2d 1353 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    Wilson v. Dept. of Public Safety & Corrections
  • Meany v. Meany 631 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    Wilson v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections, -5 (La.1989) (citations omitted).
  • Jefferson v. Costanza 628 So. 2d 1158 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that, [a]s a general proposition, [t]he determination of liability in a negligence case usually requires proof of five separate elements: (1) proof that the defendant had a duty to conform his conduct to a specific standard (the duty *1162 element); (2) proof that the
  • Hayes v. Kelly 625 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    *632 (La.1991); Wilson v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections, (La.
  • Poland v. Glenn 623 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    Wilson v. State, Department of Public Safety and Corrections
  • Grow v. Transocean Contractors, Inc. 610 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Wilson v. State, Department of Public Safety and Corrections