Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Doughty v. Insured Lloyds Ins. Co., 576 So. 2d 461.

62 citing documents.

Brittany Cavet v. Abc Insurance Company and Maison St. Charles, L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
Devin Sanders v. Woodlawn Cemetery, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2021
Monica Anderson Versus City of Kenner and the Parish of Jefferson and Xyz Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
“Under most circumstances ownership alone establishes the requisite benefit, control and authority to find garde.” (La.
Chesney v. Entergy La., L.L.C. 245 So. 3d 281 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Vail v. Schiro Bros. Shoe Store, Inc. 193 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Goers v. Mayfield 195 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Jordan v. Thatcher Street, LLC 167 So. 3d 1114 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Truxillo v. Louisiana Stadium & Exposition District 172 So. 3d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
The Louisiana Supreme Court has held that “under most circumstances, ownership alone establishes the requisite benefit, control and authority to find garde.” Doughty v. Insured Lloyds Insurance Co., et al., , , 449 n. 7 (La.1975).
Davis v. Riverside Court Condominium Ass'n Phase II, Inc. 154 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Evelyn Honore, Et Ux. v. Family Dollar Stores of Louisiana, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Honore v. Family Dollar Stores of Louisiana, Inc. 115 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Peters v. Bogalusa Community Medical Center 117 So. 3d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Flenner v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 110 So. 3d 661 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Theresa St. Julien v. Julie Walters Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Julien v. Landry 94 So. 3d 976 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Marie v. American Alternative Insurance Co. 97 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Muller v. Colony Insurance Co. 57 So. 3d 341 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
wherein a wife recovered damages for the death of her son from the CGL insurer which insured her husband’s business, even though the wife was also insured under the CGL policy as the spouse of the named insured.
Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc. 16 So. 3d 1065 La. 2009
Ronald K. Chavers v. Bright Truck Leasing Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Co., this Court explained: This article imposes strict liability based on a person’s relationship of custody (garde) to a defective thing which creates an unreasonable risk of injury to others.
Chavers v. Bright Truck Leasing 945 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Co., this Court explained: This article imposes strict liability based on a person's relationship of custody (garde) to a defective thing which creates an unreasonable risk of injury to others.
Butkiewicz v. Evans 943 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Roberson v. LAFAYETTE OILMAN'S CLAYS SHOOT 928 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
F.M. Butch" Roberson and Pamela Roberson v. Lafayette Oilman's Sporting Clay Shoot, Inc. " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Zeringue v. O'Brien Transport, Inc. 931 So. 2d 377 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Co., There is no dispute over which party had garde.
Giorgio v. Alliance Operating Corp. 921 So. 2d 58 La. 2006
Co., this Court explained: This article imposes strict liability based on a person's relationship of custody (garde) to a defective thing which creates an unreasonable risk of injury to others.
Pamplin v. Bossier Parish Community College 878 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Quinn v. RISO Investments, Inc. 869 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Engles v. City of New Orleans 872 So. 2d 1166 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Butler v. Re/Max New Orleans Properties, Inc. 828 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Young v. City of Plaquemine 818 So. 2d 898 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Baker v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc. 816 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
art. 2317 “imposes liability” based on a person’s relationship of custody (garde) to a defective thing which creates an unreasonable risk of injury to others.”
Dupree v. City of New Orleans 765 So. 2d 1002 La. 2000
In Re Succession of Moss 769 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Hendrick v. ABC Ins. Co. 760 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Strouse v. M & M PROPERTIES 753 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
King, supra ; DeRouen, supra .
Hebert v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. 757 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Bridges v. State 738 So. 2d 1149 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Carroll v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 732 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Olivier v. Alexander 737 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Small v. Baloise Ins. Co. of America 753 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Gilbert v. BDOWS, INC. 711 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Alford v. Home Ins. Co. 701 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
White v. Louviere 664 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Ehrman v. Holiday Inns, Inc. 653 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Touchet v. Estate of Bass 653 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Co., for the proposition that "[a]lthough ownership creates the presumption of garde, this presumption is rebuttable *86 by the owner.
Zeno v. Grady Crawford Construction Co. 652 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Baudoin v. McDermott, Inc. 644 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Co., Thumfart, 613 So.2d at 290 .
DeRouen v. Audirsch 639 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Mayo v. Nissan Motor Corp. 639 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Myers v. Burger King Corp. 638 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994