DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Housley v. Cerise, 579 So. 2d 973.

620 citing documents.

  • Craig Steven Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Arabie v. Citgo Petroleum Corp. 49 So. 3d 529 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Patricia Case and Patrick Case v. Shelter Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    See generally, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
  • Case v. Shelter Insurance Co. 48 So. 3d 1196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    See generally, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
  • Williams v. Stewart 46 So. 3d 266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Wynne v. Trotter 46 So. 3d 678 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    the court found that an injury is presumed to have been caused by an accident if: before the accident, the injured person was in good health, but commencing with the accident, the symptoms of the disabling condition appear and continuously manifests themselves afterwards, providing that the medical evi
  • Virginia Peoples, Et Ux. v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    We have previously emphasized the principle that “if the trial court or jury’s findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even if convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.” Stobart, 617 So.2d at 882-83 ( (quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
  • Peoples v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc. 38 So. 3d 1209 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    We have previously emphasized the principle that “if the trial court or jury’s findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even if convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.” Stobart, 617 So.2d at 882 -83 ( (quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
  • Kimberly Carter v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    Smith, 523 So.2d at 822; Hastings, 498 So.2d at 720.
  • Carter v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Insurance 40 So. 3d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Smith, 523 So.2d at 822 ; Rosell *331 v. ESCO, Hastings, 498 So.2d at 720 ....
  • Alice Mabel Crews v. Broussard Plumbing and Heating La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Miller v. Tulane University Hospital 38 So. 3d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Additionally, the plaintiffs argued that no deposition or affidavit testimony to establish causation was necessary because they were entitled to a
  • Crews v. BROUSSARD PLUMBING AND HEATING 38 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Thongsavanh v. Schexnayder 40 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • David Charlie v. Leno Hai Congtang, M.D. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Charlie v. Hai Congtang 37 So. 3d 535 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Peter Norman Broussard, Jr. v. Theta Charles Compton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    We have previously emphasized the principle that “if the trial court or jury’s findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even if convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.” Stobart, 617 So.2d at 882-83 ((quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
  • Broussard v. Compton 36 So. 3d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    We have previously emphasized the principle that “if the trial court or jury’s findings are reasonable in light of the record reviewed in its entirety, the court of appeal may not reverse, even if convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed the evidence differently.” Stobart, 617 So.2d at 882 -83 ((quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
  • Scott Ferguson v. Loewer Powersports & Equipment La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    The basis for this principle of review is grounded not only upon the better capacity of the trial court to evaluate live witnesses, but also upon the proper allocation of trial and appellate functions between the respective courts.
  • Ferguson v. LOEWER POWERSPORTS & EQUIPMENT 33 So. 3d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
  • Vanna Darlene McManus, Etc. v. State of La., Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
  • Kelly v. AME JANITORIAL SERVICES CO. 33 So. 3d 358 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2010
    Housley Presumption A plaintiff may be assisted in meeting his burden of proof that an injury is causally related to an accident by a
  • David Guidry v. Gulf Coast Coil Tubing La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Guidry v. GULF COAST COIL TUBING 24 So. 3d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Gonzales v. BUILD-A-BEAR WORKSHOP, INC. 30 So. 3d 27 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2009
  • Chanda Prather Richardson v. Steven Todd Richardson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
  • Richardson v. Richardson 25 So. 3d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • In Re Benge 24 So. 3d 822 La. 2009
    Judge Benge was referring to Maranto v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 94-2603, 94-2615 (La.2/20/95), , in which this court observed that a
  • Liz Marie Noel Smith v. Allstate Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Additionally, a reviewing court must keep in mind that if a trial court’s findings are reasonable based upon the entire record and evidence, an appellate court may not reverse said findings even if it is “convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed that evidence differently.” (quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mut.
  • Yee v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Ins. Co. 25 So. 3d 872 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Yee concedes he owes the burden of proving causation by a preponderance of the evidence, as he was in good health before the accident, symptoms began after the accident and continuously manifested themselves afterward, and the medical evidence shows a reasonable possibility of a causal connection.
  • Montgomery v. Kedgy 21 So. 3d 980 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    Mar-anto, supra; Saunders v. ANPAC Loui *984 siana Insurance Co., 43,405 (La.App.
  • Watters v. Department of Social Services 15 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    The "Housley presumption,” provides that a medical condition producing disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if, before the accident the injured *1148 person was in good health, but shortly after the accident, the disabling condition manifested itself.
  • Shawn Bernard v. the Hartford Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    “Whether an accident caused a person’s injuries is a question of fact which should not be reversed on appeal absent manifest error.” ().
  • State of Louisiana v. Timothy Glen Granger La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    See generally, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
  • Shannon Menard v. Lafayette Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Specifically, she argues the trial court erred in allowing Dr. David Aiken, the defendant’s medical expert, “to offer causation speculation inconsistent” with the supreme court’s in not empaneling alternate jurors during the June 23, 2008 selection process; in continuing the June 23 trial date 2 The jury’s consortium award to the minor child is not at issue in this appeal.
  • Menard v. Lafayette Insurance 13 So. 3d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Specifically, she argues the trial court erred in allowing Dr. David Aiken, the defendant’s medical expert, “to offer causation speculation inconsistent” with the supreme court’s in not empaneling alternate jurors during the June 23, 2008 selection process; in continuing the June 23 trial date ^without doing a more complete investigation of the defense counsel’s alleged illness; and in releasing two of the jurors from the July 23, 2008 trial after their selection on June 23, 2008.
  • State v. Granger 11 So. 3d 695 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    See generally, Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
  • Bernard v. Hartford Insurance 12 So. 3d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    “Whether an accident caused a person’s injuries is a question of fact which should not be reversed on appeal absent manifest error.” ().
  • Ruffin v. Burton 34 So. 3d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Richard v. BAYOU LAFOURCHE FRESH WATER DISTRICT 9 So. 3d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Merdis Cole v. Brookshire Grocery Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Additionally, a reviewing court must keep in mind that if a trial court’s findings are reasonable based upon the entire record and evidence, an appellate court may not reverse said findings even if it is “convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed that evidence differently.” (quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mut.
  • Cole v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 5 So. 3d 1010 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Additionally, a reviewing court must keep in mind that if a trial court’s findings are reasonable based upon the entire record and evidence, an appellate court may not reverse said findings even if it is “convinced that had it been sitting as the trier of fact, it would have weighed that evidence differently.” (quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mut.
  • Ennis v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 9 So. 3d 899 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    the Supreme Court held that a plaintiffs disability is presumed to have resulted from an accident, if: (1) the plaintiff was in good health before the accident; (2) that commencing with the accident, the symptoms of the plaintiffs disabling condition appeared and continuously manifested themselves afterward
  • Harrington v. Wilson 8 So. 3d 30 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • Marshall Ex Rel. Minor Chil. v. Air Liquide-Big Three, Inc. 2 So. 3d 541 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    at 882-883 () (quoting Sistler v. Liberty Mutual Ins.
  • Brown v. Trask 998 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
  • Newsome v. New Orleans Saints 996 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
  • Billy Wayne Rachal, Jr. v. Kimberly W. Gilchrist La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    1 However, the jury considered this case after being instructed on the potential applicability of Housley.
  • Rachal v. Gilchrist 995 So. 2d 1226 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
  • Slone v. Greber 989 So. 2d 273 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008