DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hearold, 603 So. 2d 731.

1245 citing documents.

  • State v. Gatewood 103 So. 3d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Bolden 108 So. 3d 1159 La. 2012
    (“[W]hen the entirety of the evidence, both admissible and inadmissible, is sufficient to support the conviction, the accused is not entitled to an acquittal, and the reviewing court must then consider the assignments of trial error to determine whether the accused is entitled to a new trial ...
  • State v. Causey 108 So. 3d 1163 La. 2012
    Large amounts of currency are associated with narcotics trafficking, State v. Henry, 08-658, pp. 9-10 (La.App.
  • State v. Joyner 107 So. 3d 675 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Marcantel, 00-1629, p. 8 (La.4/3/02), .
  • State v. Trim 107 So. 3d 656 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Glover 106 So. 3d 129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Bosley, 29,-253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Skipper 101 So. 3d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    ( State v. Broadway, 96-2659, p. 8 (La.10/19/99), ; Wille, 559 So.2d at 1331 ).
  • State of Louisiana v. Jonathan L.citizen La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Williams 101 So. 3d 104 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Marcantel, 2000-1629, p. 8 (La.4/3/02), .
  • State v. Richoux 101 So. 3d 483 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Cammatte 101 So. 3d 978 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Bone 107 So. 3d 49 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Taylor 103 So. 3d 517 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Armstead 98 So. 3d 891 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Marcantel, 2000-1629, p. 8 (La.4/3/02), , citing
  • State v. Cyrus 97 So. 3d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    However, the Louisiana Supreme Court has warned that the State should not be allowed to use an officer as a “passkey” to present inadmissible hearsay evidence to the jury in the guise of “explaining police actions.” see also State v. Broadway, 96-2659 p. 8 (La.10/19/99), (“[T]he fact that an officer acted on information obtained during the investigation may not be used as an indirect method of bringing before the jury the substance of the out-of-court assertions of the defendant’s guilt that wou
  • State of Louisiana v. Dryefus Malbrough La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Malbrough 94 So. 3d 933 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Williams 97 So. 3d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    the Supreme Court identified five factors, which are helpful in determining whether circumstantial evidence is sufficient to prove the intent to distributed a controlled dangerous substance: (1) whether the defendant ever distributed or att
  • State of Louisiana v. Christopher H. Joseph La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Joseph 94 So. 3d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    970 , 67 L.Ed.2d 30 (1981)
  • State of Louisiana v. Triston T. Lyons La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. L. W. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • State v. Scott 97 So. 3d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Carter 96 So. 3d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Morton 97 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Chad Tyrone Williams La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    ―When issues are raised on appeal both as to the sufficiency of the evidence and as to one or more trial errors, the reviewing court should first determine the sufficiency of the evidence.‖
  • State v. Lewis 96 So. 3d 1211 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. K.W. T. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    ―Credibility determinations are within the sound discretion of the trier of fact and will not be disturbed unless clearly contrary to the evidence.‖ 5 ―When issues are raised on appeal both as to the sufficiency of the evidence and as to one or more trial errors, the reviewing court should first determine the sufficiency of the evidence.‖
  • State ex rel. G.E. 94 So. 3d 863 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. Alfonzo Jewade Segura La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    “When the entirety of the evidence, including inadmissible evidence which was erroneously admitted, is insufficient to support the conviction, the accused must be discharged as to that crime, and any discussion by the court of the trial error issues as to that crime would be pure dicta since those issues are moot.”
  • State v. Duncan 91 So. 3d 504 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State ex rel. S.L. 94 So. 3d 822 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Jones, 05-840 (La.App.
  • State v. Abdul 94 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Johnson 91 So. 3d 1213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Bosley, 29,-253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Hernandez 93 So. 3d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State of Louisiana v. M S La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    970 (1981), and the remaining assignments of errors would be moot.
  • State of Louisiana v. Marlon Roberson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    The 2 “When issues are raised on appeal both as to the sufficiency of the evidence and as to one or more trial errors, the reviewing court should first determine the sufficiency of the evidence.”
  • State ex rel. T.M. 88 So. 3d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Massey 91 So. 3d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Anderson 91 So. 3d 1080 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
  • State v. Strickland 91 So. 3d 411 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Campbell 86 So. 3d 204 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Moton, 46,607 (La.App.2d Cir.9/21/11), ; State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Nelson 86 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Williams 85 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Updite 87 So. 3d 257 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Walls 86 So. 3d 71 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.
  • State v. Williams 88 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2012
  • State v. Anderson 85 So. 3d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    State v. Marcantel, 2000-1629, p. 8 (La.4/3/02), ; (La.
  • State v. Delanueville 90 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Johnson 91 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012