DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hearold, 603 So. 2d 731.

1244 citing documents.

  • State v. Cowart 815 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    State v. Mayeux, 94-105 (La.App.
  • State v. Matthews 814 So. 2d 619 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    State v. George, 95-0110 (La.10/16/95)
  • State v. Plaisance 811 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
  • State v. Richardson 811 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Sharp 810 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
  • State v. Sewell 811 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 *148 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Howard 805 So. 2d 1247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    the Louisiana Supreme Court set forth five factors to consider in determining whether a party had the intent to distribute narcotics.
  • State v. Maise 805 So. 2d 1141 La. 2002
  • State v. Henry 802 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • State v. Barr 806 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    (emphasis added), where the supreme court wrote: When issues are raised on appeal both as to the sufficiency of the evidence and as to one or more trial errors, the reviewing court should first determine the sufficiency of the evidence.
  • State v. Hayes 806 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Mayeux, 94-105 (La.App.
  • State v. Noil 807 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Mayeux, 94-105 (La.App.
  • State v. Antoine 804 So. 2d 869 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Bagneris 804 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Atkins, 97-1278 (La.App.
  • State v. Temple 806 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Mayeux, 94-105 (La.
  • State v. Kempton 806 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Goldston 804 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Clark 803 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Richthofen 803 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Mayeux, 94-105 (La.App.
  • State v. Davis 818 So. 2d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    in cases such as this where the defendant raises issues on appeal both as to the sufficiency of the evidence and as to one or more trial errors, the reviewing court should preliminarily determine the sufficiency of the evidence before discussing the other issues raised on appeal.
  • State v. Gaal 800 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Sprinkle 801 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Mayeux, 94-105 (La.App.
  • State v. Ducre 809 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    285 , 102 L.Ed.2d 265 (1988)
  • State v. Hansbro 796 So. 2d 185 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Hunt 797 So. 2d 138 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.
  • State v. Ratliff 796 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Ard, 95-1567 (La.App.
  • State v. Baker 796 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Johnson 796 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. MM 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • State v. M.M. 802 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Jones 794 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Bishop 792 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), ; (La.App.
  • State v. Holmes 791 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • State v. Noten 791 So. 2d 607 La. 2001
    State v. Hearold, 90-2094 (La.1992), (inference of intent to distribute may arise from evidence of prior acts of distribution).
  • State v. Lathan 792 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.
  • State v. Belcher 793 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), .
  • State v. Woods 787 So. 2d 1083 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    285 , 102 L.Ed.2d 265 (1988); (La.
  • State v. Williams 786 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Anderson 786 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Groce 786 So. 2d 200 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    we always take up sufficiency of the evidence assignments first.
  • State v. Sumling 786 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. George, 95-0110 (La.10/16/95)
  • State v. Ste. Marie 801 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
    this court addressed this assignment in its previous opinion, Ste.
  • State v. Lindsey 786 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    State v. Atkins, 97-1278 (La.App.
  • State v. Hebert 787 So. 2d 1041 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    State v. Johnson, 766 So.2d at 577 , -36 (La.1992).
  • State v. Murphy 785 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
  • State v. Brazil 784 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. King 782 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • State v. Debrow 781 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
  • State v. Jackson 781 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.
  • State v. Hensley 781 So. 2d 834 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    State v. Mayeux, 94-105 (La.App.