Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hearold, 603 So. 2d 731.

1244 citing documents.

State v. Bugbee 781 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
State v. Johnson 780 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
the Louisiana Supreme Court listed five factors, that are helpful in determining whether circumstantial evidence is sufficient to prove the intent to distribute a controlled dangerous substance: (1) whether the defendant ever distributed or
State v. Brooks 777 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
State v. Alexis, 98-1145 (La.App.5 Cir.6/1/99), , writ denied, 99-1937 (La.10/13/00), .
State ex rel. K.G. 778 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Mickens, 31,737 (La.App.2d Cir.03/31/99), , writ denied, 99-1078 (La.09/24/99), .
State Ex Rel. Kg 778 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Mickens, 31,737 (La.
State v. Walker 778 So. 2d 695 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , *703 writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
State v. Moore 777 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Schoening 807 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
and State v. Taylor, 96-320 (La.App.
State v. Schleve 775 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
970, 972-73 , 67 L.Ed.2d 30 (1981)
State v. Taylor 774 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), ; (La.App.
State v. Simmons 779 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Nelson 775 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Robinson 772 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Johnson 780 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
-36 (La.1992), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Intent is a condition of mind which is usually proved by evidence of circumstances from which intent may be inferred.
State v. McBride 773 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
State v. Calhoun 776 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
we will consider this assignment of error first.
State v. Davenport 771 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Interest of WTB 771 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
970 , 67 L.Ed.2d 30 (1981); State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
State v. Quest 772 So. 2d 772 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Ashley 768 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
State v. Sanders 769 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
State v. Chisolm 771 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
State v. Jackson 768 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. McCurtis 769 So. 2d 150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Sudds 769 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
State v. Newman 769 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
State v. Stevens 766 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
State v. Ponsell 766 So. 2d 678 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
State v. Tisby 764 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.
State v. Williams 764 So. 2d 1164 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.04/02/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
State v. Debrow 763 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Johnson 766 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
-36 (La.1992), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Intent is a condition of mind which is usually proved by evidence of circumstances from which intent may be inferred.
State v. Wommack 770 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
wherein the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a sufficiency review includes review of all evidence presented to the jury, whether properly admissible or inadmissible.
State v. Marts 765 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Hudson 760 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
State v. James 761 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
we will address these assignments first, as they both concern the sufficiency of the evidence.
State v. Stokes 759 So. 2d 980 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. White, 98-91 (La.App.
State v. Snavely 759 So. 2d 950 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Thompson 758 So. 2d 972 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Jetton 756 So. 2d 1206 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Young 764 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
HEARSAY TESTIMONY Defendant argues that testimony by Krieger, regarding information received from a
State v. James 754 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
*433 State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.04/02/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), .
State v. Barrett 756 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Myers 756 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Tolliver 753 So. 2d 958 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. McDonald 754 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979)
State v. Robinson 754 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Bosley, 29,253 (La.App.2d Cir.4/2/97), , writ denied, 97-1203 (La.10/17/97), ; (La.App.
State v. Taylor 757 So. 2d 63 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Mills , 95-359 at p. 9, 665 So.2d at 494 .
State v. Milton 751 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Bullard, 29,662 (La.App.2d Cir.09/24/97), .
State v. Thompson 752 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000