Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hearold, 603 So. 2d 731.

1244 citing documents.

State v. Clark 259 So. 3d 1178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) ; State v. Hearold , (La.
State v. Hampton 261 So. 3d 993 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Robert Lee Belsha La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
which stated that a Jackson review encompasses all the evidence adduced at trial whether admissible or inadmissible; which set forth the mechanism for testing the admissibility of scientific and technical evidence in Louisiana.
State v. Williams 259 So. 3d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.
State v. Jackson 265 So. 3d 928 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
11/29/06), , 660 ; , 734 (La.
State v. Devillier 258 So. 3d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.
State v. Harrell 258 So. 3d 1007 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.
State v. Lewis 256 So. 3d 510 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State of Louisiana v. Dirk Douglas Thomas AKA Dirk Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Thomas 255 So. 3d 1189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
970 , 67 L.Ed.2d 30 (1981) ; State v. Hearold
State v. Vaughn 259 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
285 , 102 L.Ed.2d 265 (1988) ; , 734 (La.
State v. Folse 258 So. 3d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.
State v. Folse 258 So. 3d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.
State v. Williams 252 So. 3d 892 La. 2018
State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.
State v. Howard 258 So. 3d 66 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.
State v. Smart 254 So. 3d 28 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Sandifer 249 So. 3d 142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Aaron Orlando Richards -Aka- Aaron Richards La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
State v. Richards 247 So. 3d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
970 , 67 L.Ed.2d 30 (1981)
State v. Colby 244 So. 3d 1260 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Contreras 247 So. 3d 858 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Clay 248 So. 3d 665 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Generally, under State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.
State v. Bass 248 So. 3d 639 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
2d 560 (1979) ; State v. Hearold , (La.
State v. Eckert 244 So. 3d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that when issues of sufficiency of the evidence and other errors are asserted, the issue of sufficiency of evidence should be addressed first.
State of Louisiana v. Daniel Jeremy Eckert La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that when issues of sufficiency of the evidence and other errors are asserted, the issue of sufficiency of evidence should be addressed first.
State v. Brazell 245 So. 3d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 3/11/15), , 135 (quoting State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.
State v. Coleman 249 So. 3d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.
State v. Pittman 244 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) ; State v. Hearold , (La.
State v. Washington 245 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Wells 241 So. 3d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Billy Dean Cotten La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
all of the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution, admissible as well as inadmissible, “is sufficiently reasonable that a rational juror could not ‘have found proof of guilt beyond 3 a reasonable doubt.’” Captville, 448 So.2d at 680 (quoting Jackson ); (“[W]hen the entirety of the evidence, both admissible and inadmissible, is sufficient to support the conviction, the accused is not entitled to an acquittal, and the reviewing court must then consider the assignments of trial error
State v. Cotten 241 So. 3d 457 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
" Captville , 448 So.2d at 680 (quoting Jackson ); see State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.1992) ("[W]hen the entirety of the evidence, both admissible and inadmissible, is sufficient to support the conviction, the accused is not entitled to an acquittal, and the reviewing court must then consider the assignments of trial error to determine whether the accused is entitled to a new trial.")....
State v. Robinson 246 So. 3d 725 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Magee 243 So. 3d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Martin 243 So. 3d 56 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.
State v. Kelly 239 So. 3d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.
State of Louisiana v. Darryl Jones La. 2018
When issues are raised on appeal both as to the sufficiency of the evidence and as to one or more trial errors, the reviewing court should first assess the sufficiency of the evidence, (La.
State v. Jackson 246 So. 3d 646 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979) ; State v. Hearold , (La.
State v. Van Nortrick 244 So. 3d 810 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
State v. Deubler 236 So. 3d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.
State v. Doucet 237 So. 3d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.
State v. Harris 235 So. 3d 1354 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
App. 5 Cir. 3/11/15); , (La.
State v. Brown 235 So. 3d 1314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Reokenski Vodise Thomas AKA Reokenski Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Robert Sinegal -Aka- Robert Senegal La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Thomas 258 So. 3d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.1992) (footnote omitted).
State of Louisiana v. Gregory Hampton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Hampton 259 So. 3d 1125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Isaac 229 So. 3d 1030 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Nathaniel Climes Thibeaux AKA Nathaniel Thibeaux La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017