Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hearold, 603 So. 2d 731.

1244 citing documents.

State v. Thibeaux 229 So. 3d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Leslie C. Thompson La. 2017
State v. Mahogany 225 So. 3d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
App. 4 Cir. 3/11/15), ( (La.
State of Louisiana v. Robert N. Green La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Green 248 So. 3d 360 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
See State v. Hearold , , 734 (La.1992).
State v. Murray 223 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Michael Moultrie 224 So. 3d 349 La. 2017
State v. Saulny 220 So. 3d 871 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Hawkins 219 So. 3d 1133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Nathaniel McCoy, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
“When issues are raised on appeal both as to the sufficiency of the evidence and as to one or more trial errors, the reviewing court should first determine the sufficiency of the evidence.”
State v. McCoy 219 So. 3d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
“When issues are raised on appeal both as to the sufficiency of the evidence and as to one or more trial errors, the reviewing court should first determine the sufficiency of the evidence.”
State of Louisiana v. Hank Allen Moran AKA - Hank Moran La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Moran 218 So. 3d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
970 , 67 L.Ed.2d 30 (1981)
State v. Randolph 219 So. 3d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
“Generally, an explanation of the officer’s actions should never be an acceptable basis upon which to *434 admit an out-of-court declaration when the so-called ‘explanation’ involves a direct assertion of criminal activity against the accused.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Gary D. Howard 226 So. 3d 419 La. 2017
ossession for distribution to others; (3) whether the amount of drug created an inference of an intent to distribute; (4) whether expert or other testimony established that the amount of drug found in the defendant's possession is inconsistent with personal use only; and (5) whether there was any paraphernalia, such as baggies or scales, evidencing an intent to distribute.” (La.
State of Louisiana v. Joshua X. Griffin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Griffin 217 So. 3d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Christopher O. James La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Mere possession of a substance is not evidence of the intent to distribute “unless the quantity is so large that no other inference is possible.” -36 (La.1992).
State v. James 216 So. 3d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Mere possession of a substance is not evidence of the intent to distribute “unless the quantity is so large that no other inference is possible.” -36 (La.1992).
State v. Jones 214 So. 3d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
4/3/02), (“When issues are raised on appeal as to the sufficiency of the evidence and as to one or more trial errors, we first determine the sufficiency of the evidence.”) ( (La.
State of Louisiana v. Leo Paul Thibodeaux, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Thibodeaux 216 So. 3d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State v. Green 211 So. 3d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Danial Lewayne Lafleur -Aka- Daniel Lafleur -Aka- Daniel Lee Lafleur -Aka- Danial Lafleur La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
State v. Lafleur 209 So. 3d 927 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
State of Louisiana v. Gerald Brent Debarge La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. DeBarge 210 So. 3d 377 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Castro 206 So. 3d 1059 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Joshua Jerome Ball La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
State v. Kyles 233 So. 3d 150 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Speaks 204 So. 3d 1167 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
State v. Ball 209 So. 3d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Brown 205 So. 3d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
5 Cir. 3/11/15) , ( (La.
State of Louisiana v. Joseph Taylor 217 So. 3d 283 La. 2016
State v. Rodgers 202 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Rose 206 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
2781 , 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); (La.
State v. Flowers 204 So. 3d 271 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Hayes 204 So. 3d 201 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Caminita 203 So. 3d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Williams 199 So. 3d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
(‘When issues are raised on appeal both as to the sufficiency of the evidence and as to one or more trial errors, the reviewing -court should first determine the sufficiency of the evidence.”).
State v. Alexander 197 So. 3d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Bradstreet 196 So. 3d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Scott 197 So. 3d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Otkins-Victor 193 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Victor 195 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
State v. Mayeux, 94-105 (La.App.
State of Louisiana Versus Errol Victor, Sr. La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
State v. Jackson 193 So. 3d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 3/11/15), , writ denied, 15-0651 (La.2/26/16), ().
State v. Wilson 196 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State v. Cortez, 48,319 (La.App.2d Cir.8/7/13), .
State v. Thomas 192 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
State v. Clements 194 So. 3d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016