Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mobley, 592 So. 2d 1282.

13 citing documents.

  • State v. Collins 275 So. 3d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • State v. Hoerner 88 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
  • State v. Ostrom 980 So. 2d 890 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Though not specifically cited by Ostrom, there are two holdings of the Louisiana Supreme Court which give support to Ostrom’s argument, (in which the court overturned a felon in possession of a weapon conviction), (where, in a one-sentence ruling citing Williams , the court held that “[t]he state also bears the burden at trial of negating the cleansing period”).
  • State v. Harris 754 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    The more than one year recurring acts element is an essential element of the offense of molestation of a (whether the predicate convictions in a multiple offender DWI prosecution are considered essential elements of the offense or essential averments of the bill of information, the state bears the burden of proving the convictions at trial); (where an accused is charged
  • State v. Carlos 738 So. 2d 556 La. 1999
    (per curiam) (recognizing the apparent conflict in our jurisprudence on the issue of whether the recidivist portions of the DWI statute constitute "essential elements" of the crime).
  • State v. Davis 734 So. 2d 896 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • State v. Lecompte 734 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    The more than one year recurring acts element is an essential element of the offense of molestation of a (whether the predicate convictions in a multiple offender DWI prosecution are considered essential elements of the offense or essential averments of the bill of information, the state bears the burden of proving the convictions at trial); (where an accused is charged
  • State v. Anderson 720 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • Middleton v. Parish of Jefferson 707 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    435-37; Riggins v. Dixie Shoring Co., Inc. reh'g denied, .
  • Barnco Intern., Inc. v. Arkla, Inc. 684 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    See generally the rehearing denial in Riggins
  • State v. Randolph 674 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • State v. Rolen 662 So. 2d 446 La. 1995
  • State v. Gardner 649 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994