DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., 583 So. 2d 829.

362 citing documents.

  • Smart v. Kansas City Southern RR 830 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Craighead v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co., 33,731 (La.App.2d Cir.8/25/00), , writ denied, 2000-2946 (La.12/15/00), ; Kennedy v. Thomas, supra .
  • Edwards v. New Zion Apartments Ltd. Partnership 830 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.
  • Estevez v. Baron 828 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    See: Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Chrysler Corp. 834 So. 2d 1026 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.
  • Bowie v. Young 813 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • Rogers v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 813 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
    1241 , 146 L.Ed.2d 100 (2000) ().
  • Seitz v. Scofield 812 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • Robinson v. Fontenot 815 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the court said: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one.
  • Keel v. West Louisiana Health Services 803 So. 2d 382 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
  • Miller v. Southern Baptist Hosp. 806 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    In determining whether the trial court erred in granting a JNOV as to quantum, the Supreme Court in Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., stated: The appellate court, in determining whether the trial court erred in granting the JNOV as to quantum, once again uses the criteria set forth in Scott, supra, i.e., could reasonable men in the exercise of impartial judgment differ as to the fact that the jury award was either abusively high or ab
  • Adams v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 804 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    [9] Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., -834 (La.1991).
  • Templet v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp. and Development 818 So. 2d 54 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • Davis v. Hoffman 800 So. 2d 1028 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    The trial court in its reasons for judgment noted that; Given the time of the day and lighting conditions, the failure of the bus driver to sound her horn, the duty of a driver to carefully watch the children in the street; the street condition and width; the lack of adult supervision of the children (cf. Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., and ); the lack of sidewalks (which would force pedestrians into the street); the statutory duty set forth in R.S.
  • Hunter v. Wal-Mart Supercenter 798 So. 2d 936 La. 2001
    DISCUSSION In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., we set forth the proper standard to be applied in order to grant a JNOV: Judgment notwithstanding verdict (JNOV) is warranted when facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict, and JNOV moti
  • Dang v. New Hampshire Ins. Co. 798 So. 2d 1204 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • Posey v. Singletary 795 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.
  • McCarra v. Illinois Central Railroad 798 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • Young v. First National Bank of Shreveport 794 So. 2d 128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., May v. Jones, 28,106 (La.
  • Griffin v. Louisiana Sheriff's Auto Risk 802 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., -34 (La.1991); Thibodeaux v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 98-0556, p. 2 *700 (La.App.
  • Dufrene v. Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania 790 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    citing Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
  • Philips v. Berner 789 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • Harris v. United Agents Insurance Co. of Louisiana 784 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    See also Powell v. RTA, 96-0715 (La.6/18/97), ; State of Louisiana, DOTD v. Scramuzza, 95-786 (La.App.
  • Coleman v. Deno 787 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • Smith v. Lee 783 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    See Anderson v. New Orleans Public Services, Inc., LSA-C.C.P.
  • Kennedy v. Thomas 784 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Craighead v. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Company, 33,731 (La.App.2d Cir.8/25/00), , writ denied, 2000-2946 (La.12/15/00), .
  • Martin v. Heritage Manor South 784 So. 2d 627 La. 2001
  • McClary v. Schiro 801 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Thibodeaux v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 98-0556, p. 2 (La.App.
  • Abadie v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 784 So. 2d 46 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    STANDARD FOR JNOV In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the court set forth the law regulating this procedure as follows: In Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, we set forth the criteria to be used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
  • Hogue v. Sussmane-Stubbs 780 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., May v. Jones, 28,106 (La.
  • Howard v. State, Dept. of Agriculture & Forestry 780 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • Johnson v. English 779 So. 2d 876 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
  • LeBlanc v. Breaux 777 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    the Court stated: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 774 So. 2d 84 La. 2000
    Doe v. Doe, 94-2284 (La.App.
  • McCray v. J/H/J, INC. 769 So. 2d 1273 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the criteria first set forth in Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, (La.
  • Singleton v. AAA Home Health, Inc. 772 So. 2d 346 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    The Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the criteria we should consider in determining whether a JNOV is proper in Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (citation omitted): A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc. 772 So. 2d 94 La. 2000
  • Love v. Lewis 771 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.
  • Rizzuto v. Walker 779 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    5 th Cir. 4/14/94), , writ denied, 94-1895 (La.10/28/94), ().
  • Craighead v. Preferred Risk Mut. Ins. Co. 769 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.
  • Millican v. Ponds 762 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • Hancock v. New Roads Motor Co. 762 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • Ford v. STATE, EX REL. DOTD 760 So. 2d 478 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    The standard for granting a JNOV, as well as the standard *483 for appellate review of a JNOV, have been developed jurisprudentially and are found in Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (citation omitted): A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Maltby v. Lyttle 758 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
    In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the court set forth the law regulating this procedure as follows: In Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, we set forth the criteria to be used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
  • Eubanks v. Salmon 756 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Lambert v. State Through Dept. of Transp.
  • Precht v. Case Corp. 756 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
    *494 Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (citation omitted), the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the criteria first set forth in Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, for determining whether a JNOV has been properly granted pursuant to La.Code Civ.P.
  • Hyatt v. Raggio 757 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the guidelines for a trial court’s consideration of the motion.
  • Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 751 So. 2d 357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
  • McAshan v. Jack's Pest Control 782 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    For example, in the instant case the trial court rendered a JNOV which is subject to a very strict standard of review under Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service,Inc., (La.
  • Cortez v. Zurich Ins. Co. 752 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    C. Propriety of the Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the criteria first set forth in Scott v. Hospital Service Dist.
  • Explained Thrash v. Maerhofer 745 So. 2d 1238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    As explained in Anderson v. New Orleans Public Serv., Inc., a JNOV is appropriate when the evidence points so overwhelmingly in the favor of one party that the court concludes that reasonable men could not reach a different conclusion.