DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., 583 So. 2d 829.

362 citing documents.

  • Mendoza v. Mashburn 747 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1999
  • Williams v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co. 746 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    It cites the case of Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., which states the applicable law regarding the granting of a JNOV and the standard of review to be used when JNOV is granted: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary
  • Matthews v. Arkla Lubricants Inc. 740 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Morehead, supra .
  • James v. Beauregard Elec. Co-Op., Inc. 736 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    -834 (La.1991), the supreme court discussed the approach to be used by the trial court when reviewing a damages award pursuant to a JNOV: Once a trial court has concluded that a JNOV is warranted because reasonable men could not differ on the fact that the award was either abusively high or abusively low, it must
  • Peterson v. Gibraltar Sav. and Loan 733 So. 2d 1198 La. 1999
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1
  • Selico v. Intercontinental Bulktank Corp. 733 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
    An appellate court reviewing the grant of a JNOV applies the same criteria used by the court below, : A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Mustiful v. Strickland 732 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (emphasis added), the supreme court enunciated the criteria for the trial court in considering a motion for JNOV and for the appellate court in reviewing the trial court’s action: A JNOV is warranted when ...
  • Thibodeaux v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 729 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., -34 (La.
  • McBride v. H. BROWN MACH. SHOP 732 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
    Serv., Inc., (citations omitted).
  • Durham v. Stevens Transport, Inc. 731 So. 2d 451 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    the court stated: *454 A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Kistner v. King 726 So. 2d 68 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • Holt v. Cannon Exp. Corp. 722 So. 2d 433 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.App.
  • Smith v. Davill Petroleum Co., Inc. 744 So. 2d 23 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the criteria first set forth in Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, (La.
  • Bell v. Ayio 731 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    See, e.g., Hill v. Morehouse Parish Police Jury, 95-1100 (La.1/16/96); (15-year old boy killed in car accident, father awarded $150,000 general damages); Campbell v. Department of Transportation and Development, 94-1052 (La.1/17/95), (each parent awarded $150,000 general damages for death of son killed in car accident); 3-year old killed in pedestrian/bus accident, single mother awarded $150,000).
  • Endsley v. Pennington 718 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • STATE, DOTD v. August Christina & Bros., Inc. 716 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
  • Formose v. Trapani 710 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, Orgeron v. Prescott, 93-926 (La.App.
  • Jones v. Hawkins 708 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • DUPRE' v. Maison Blanche, Inc. 712 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    In its subsequent opinion in Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the court reiterated these same criteria stating: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Wyatt v. Red Stick Services, Inc. 711 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
    art. 1811 was articulated by the supreme court in Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., as follows: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Johnson v. Clark 710 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
    Inc., (alterations in original), outlined the standard of appellate review of a JNOV in connection with the quantum of damages.
  • Diez v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, Inc. 709 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
  • Peterson v. Gibraltar Sav. and Loan 711 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    the court stated: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Delaney v. Whitney Nat. Bank 703 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    See Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • Daye v. General Motors Corp. 712 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court fully set out the criteria to be used by a trial court to determine when a JNOV is proper, and the standard of appellate review of the grant of a JNOV.
  • Moore v. Cabaniss 699 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
  • Cooper v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 699 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., our Supreme Court, citing Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, summarized the criteria to be used in determining whether a JNOV is proper.
  • Allen v. Union Pacific Railroad 698 So. 2d 1037 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    art. 1811; May v. Jones, 28,106 (La.App.2d Cir. 5/8/96), , unit denied.
  • Gallien v. Stapleton Corp. 692 So. 2d 1271 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • Morehead v. Ford Motor Co. 694 So. 2d 650 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.
  • Kreher v. Semreh Club 694 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
    Serv., Inc., citing Scott v. Hosp.
  • Johnston v. Southwest Louisiana Ass'n 693 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • Manville v. Citizen 689 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • Bower v. Jo Ellen Smith Convalescent Center 688 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • Neal v. Falcon 682 So. 2d 818 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    LAW The criteria for determining when a as follows: ...
  • Cormier v. McDonough 682 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Lambert v. State, Through Dept. of Transp. 683 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • Parker v. Centenary Heritage Manor 677 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • May v. Jones 675 So. 2d 275 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., citing Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, see also Gibson v. Bossier City General Hosp., supra.
  • STATE DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV. v. Scramuzza 673 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
  • Sanders v. Zeagler 670 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
  • Brungart v. K Mart Corp. 668 So. 2d 1335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    the supreme court reiterated the criteria first set forth in Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, to be used in determining whether a JNOV has been properly granted pursuant to Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 1811: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences poi
  • Ventress v. Union Pacific RR Co. 666 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    fixed the standard of review for JNOV's: In Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, we set forth the criteria to be used in determining when a JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes tha
  • United Group of National Paper Distributors, Inc. v. Vinson 666 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, Gibson, supra.
  • UNITED GROUP OF NATL. PAPER DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. Vinson 666 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, Gibson, supra .
  • Wilson v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. OF LOUISIANA 665 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    : A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Perkins v. Guaranty Nat. Ins. Co. 667 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    The Louisiana Supreme Court reiterated the criteria we should consider in determining whether a JNOV is proper in Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • Turner v. Massiah 656 So. 2d 636 La. 1995
  • Evans v. Kilbert 660 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    For a discussion of the parameters applied in making such a determination, see Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.App.
  • Russo v. Bratton 657 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995