DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., 583 So. 2d 829.

362 citing documents.

  • Taylor v. American Laundry MacHinery, Inc. 658 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Doe v. Doe 657 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    See Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • In Re Medical Review Panel 657 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    the Louisiana Supreme Court held that: A JNOV [Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict] is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Sutton v. Lambert 657 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Hall v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 658 So. 2d 204 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • IP Timberlands Operating Co. v. Denmiss Corp. 657 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Belle Pass Terminal, Inc. v. John, Inc., (La.App.
  • Sledge v. Continental Cas. Co. 654 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • Daigle v. US Fidelity and Guar. Ins. Co. 655 So. 2d 431 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • Batiste v. New Hampshire Ins. Co. 657 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
  • Haydel v. Hercules Transport, Inc. 654 So. 2d 418 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • Ehrman v. Holiday Inns, Inc. 653 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
    -834 (La.1991), the Louisiana Supreme Court focused on the issue of damages, stating: Once a trial court has concluded that a JNOV is warranted because reasonable men could not differ on the fact that the award was either abusively high or abusively low, it must then determine what is the proper amount of damages
  • Drury v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. 659 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • Alleman v. Brownie Drilling Co. 647 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    *375 JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT "The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., , at page 832 (La.1991), discusses the criteria to be used in determining when a motion for JNOV is proper: `A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Barlow v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 645 So. 2d 1256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    The criteria for granting a
  • Stevens v. Hartford Ins. Co. of Midwest 646 So. 2d 981 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., our Supreme Court enunciated the standards for consideration of a motion for JNOV and review on appeal of a grant of JNOV as follows: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive
  • Fitch v. Vintage Petroleum, Inc. 652 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    LAW AND ANALYSIS I. JNOV In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the supreme court stated the criteria for determining when a JNOV is properly granted, and the standard for appellate review, as follows: "In reviewing a JNOV, the appellate court must first determine if the trial court erred in granting the JNOV.
  • Adkins v. Burris Mill & Feed, Inc. 644 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • Porche v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 644 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • Alphonse v. Omni Hotels Management Corp. 643 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • Kramer v. Continental Cas. Co. 641 So. 2d 557 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    Focusing specifically on the issue of damages in a JNOV motion, -834 (La.1991), states: "Once a trial court has concluded that a JNOV is warranted because reasonable men could not differ on the fact that the award was either abusively high or abusively low, it must then determine what is the proper amount of damages to be awarded.
  • Chambers v. Graybiel 639 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • Morgan v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc. 640 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
  • Orgeron v. Prescott 636 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
  • Langlinais v. Figueroa 636 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    : Once a trial court has concluded that a JNOV is warranted because reasonable men could not differ on the fact that the award was either abusively high or abusively low, it must then determine what is the proper amount of damages to be awarded.
  • Verret v. Carline 634 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Serv., Sumrall, 612 So.2d at 1013 .
  • Autin's Cajun Joint Vent. v. Kroger Co. 637 So. 2d 538 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • Rabito v. Otis Elevator Co. 633 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    art. 1811; Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • Terro v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 631 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
    Although the article does not specify the grounds on which a trial judge may grant a JNOV, the Louisiana Supreme Court restated the criteria for determining when a and further detailed the duty of an appellate court in reviewing the trial court's action on the motion for JNOV.
  • Kirby v. Langston's Furniture & Appliance 631 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    While issues of credibility should not be decided in connection with a motion for a directed verdict, Reilly, supra at 145 ; Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the motion cannot be defeated merely by characterizing a particular finding as a matter of credibility.
  • Chenniliaro v. Kaufman & Broad Home Sys. 636 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the criteria to be used in determining when a JNOV is proper.
  • Pino v. Gauthier 633 So. 2d 638 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Sanders 628 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Himel Marine, Inc. v. Braquet 629 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
  • Laing v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. 628 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Gibson, supra .
  • Morgan v. Belanger 633 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Bowers v. Viator 625 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    the Supreme Court definitively answered the question as to the constraints placed upon a trial judge who grants a JNOV on the issue of damages.
  • Hoyt v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 623 So. 2d 651 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    In Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the use of JNOV and stated as follows: A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Finnie v. Vallee 620 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • LeBourgeois v. Wendell 618 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
  • Braud v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. 618 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1, 496 So.2d at 274 ; (La.App.
  • Barnes v. Bott 615 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    4th Cir.1990), aff'd, we approved an award of $150,000 to a single mother whose three-year-old son was killed in a pedestrian/bus accident.
  • Hurst v. Drusilla Seafood of Hammond 616 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Cay v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 614 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Plaintiffs argue that the trial court did not articulate its analysis for its award and the appellate court should therefore, look to prior awards to determine the proper amount of damages, as their authority.
  • Doe v. Roman Catholic Church 615 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., -32 (La.1991).
  • Gray v. Texaco, Inc. 610 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    LAW The Louisiana Supreme Court, in Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., , at page 832 (La.1991), discusses the criteria to be used in determining when a motion for JNOV is proper: "A JNOV is warranted when the facts and inferences point so strongly and overwhelmingly in favor of one party that the court believes that reasonable men could not arrive at a contrary verdict.
  • Fisher v. Clarkson 613 So. 2d 299 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Our appellate standard in reviewing a trial court’s grant of a JNOV
  • Sumrall v. Sumrall 612 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
    Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., Scott v. Hospital Service District No. 1 of Parish of St.
  • Jackson v. AL & W. MOORE TRUCKING 609 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    Zeagler v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc., supra ; Anderson v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., (La.App.
  • Suarez v. Modica 609 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
  • STATE, DOTD v. Scramuzza 608 So. 2d 1069 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992