Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roberts v. Benoit, 605 So. 2d 1032.

308 citing documents.

Nicholson v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury 685 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Gray v. Economy Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. 682 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Theriot v. Lasseigne, 93-2661 (La.7/5/94)
Bannerman v. Bishop 688 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Jones v. Hyatt Corp. of Delaware 681 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Vig v. City of Shreveport 679 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Misenheimer v. WBR PARISH SHERIFF'S OFFICE 677 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Osborne v. Vulcan Foundry, Inc. 675 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
The Louisiana duty/ rehearing granted, on rehearing (La.1992).
White v. City of Baker 676 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Davis v. Puryear 673 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Sanders v. Spector 673 So. 2d 1176 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
The possibility that Sanders will not receive appropriate medical attention as a on reh'g (La.1992): To prevail on a negligence claim under La.Civ.Code arts.
Ventress v. Union Pacific RR Co. 666 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Mays v. Gretna Athletic Boosters, Inc. 668 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Crovetto v. New Orleans City Park Improvement Assoc., 94-1735, (La.App.
Guzman v. State 664 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Norred v. Radisson Hotel Corp. 665 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Freeman v. Julia Place Ltd. Partners 663 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Ayres v. Beauregard Elec. Co-Op., Inc. 663 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Matthews v. Consolidated Companies, Inc. 657 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Johnson v. Bennett 658 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Wichser v. Major 694 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
The city further argues that Wichser acted for purely personal and private reasons
Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University 655 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
11/30/94), ; Thomas C. Galligan, Jr., A Primer on the Patterns of Negligence, 53 La.L.Rev.
Crovetto v. New Orleans City Park Improvement Ass'n 653 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Stewart v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. 657 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
S. Cent. Bell Tel. Co. v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 652 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
the Louisiana Supreme Court held that in order to prevail on a negligence claim under La.C.C.
Davis v. Insurance Co. of North America 652 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Hartman v. Vermilion Parish Police Jury 651 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Jackson v. Ferrand 658 So. 2d 691 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Peterson v. Doe 647 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Juneau v. Strawmyer 647 So. 2d 1294 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
1st Cir.1992); on rehearing; Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.
Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp. 646 So. 2d 318 La. 1994
on rehearing, Fowler v. Roberts on rehearing, (La.
Luccia v. Cummings 646 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
We have carefully examined the cases cited by appellant, and we are unaware of any basis for imposing primary liability under LSA-C.C.
Brown v. Lee 639 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Meany v. Meany 639 So. 2d 229 La. 1994
DeRouen v. Audirsch 639 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
art. 2315; Dixie Drive It Yourself System v. American Beverage Co., 242 La.
Cavalier v. Cain's Hydrostatic Testing, Inc. 637 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Roberts v. State, Louisiana Health and Human Resources Administration
Smith v. LOUISIANA HEALTH & HUMAN RES. 637 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Slaton v. Stein 640 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
our Louisiana Supreme Court noted the highly fact-intensive nature of the duty-risk analysis: |4“In Laird v. Travelers Insurance Co., 263 La.
Bordelon v. St. Frances Cabrini Hosp. 640 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Hulan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 635 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Simpson v. State Through DOTD 636 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Polk v. Blanque 633 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
In making the requisite analysis, directs us to consider four questions: Was the conduct in question a substantial factor in bringing about the harm to the plaintiff, i.e., was it a cause-in-fact of the harm which occurred?
Hutzler v. Cole 633 So. 2d 1319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Mart v. Hill, 505 So.2d at 1122 .
Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp. 632 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Meany v. Meany 631 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Vallery v. Southern Baptist Hosp. 630 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Antee v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. 627 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Bohmfalk v. City of New Orleans 628 So. 2d 1143 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
In a similar case, Roberts v. Benoit the Supreme Court ruled that Sheriff Foti could not be held liable for an injury caused by an intoxicated off-duty commissioned deputy that shot a friend while engaging in horseplay.
Carr v. City of New Orleans 626 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
See, and the cases cited therein.
Hayes v. Kelly 625 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
*632 (La.1991); Wilson v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections, (La.
Winget v. Colfax Creosoting Co. 626 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Liability is determined by applying the duty-risk analysis, recently reiterated in Roberts v. Benoit, *372 to factual conclusions.
Washington v. Reed 624 So. 2d 465 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993