Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roberts v. Benoit, 605 So. 2d 1032.
- Geter v. Maten 626 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-
Brock v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
617 So. 2d 1234
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Malone, Ruminations on Cause-in-Fact, 9 Stan.
- Weaver v. Valley Elec. Membership Corp. 615 So. 2d 1375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
-
McCullom v. Regional Transit Authority
616 So. 2d 239
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Cause in fact is generally a "but for" inquiry; if the plaintiff probably would not have sustained the injuries but for the defendant's substandard conduct, such conduct is a cause in fact....
- Cockerham v. Atlantic Richfield Co. 615 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
-
Potter v. FIRST FEDERAL S & L ASS'N OF SCOTLANDVILLE
615 So. 2d 318
La. 1993
(on reh'g); Harris v. Pizza Hut, Inc., (La.
- Healy v. National RR Corp.(Amtrak) 613 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
- Johnson v. Gantt 606 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992