DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Home Ins. Co. v. National Tea Co., 588 So. 2d 361.

20 citing documents.

  • Garland Miller v. Desoto Regional Health System La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    10 (quoting Polozola v. Garlock, Inc., ), the court noted: A contract of indemnity whereby the indemnitee is indemnified against the consequences of his own negligence is strictly construed, and such a contract will not be construed to indemnify an inde
  • Miller v. Desoto Regional Health System 128 So. 3d 649 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
    (quoting Polozola v. Garlock, Inc., ), the court noted: A contract of indemnity whereby the indemnitee is indemnified against the consequences of his own negligence is strictly construed, and such a contract will not be construed to indemnify an indemnitee against losses resultin
  • Melba Elaine Jessop v. City of Alexandria La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    (citations omitted), reviewed the rules of interpretation of contracts governing indemnity provisions as set forth in a lease as follows: A contract of indemnity whereby the indemnitee is indemnified against the consequences of his own negligence is strictly con
  • Jessop v. City of Alexandria 871 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    (citations omitted), reviewed the rules of interpretation of contracts governing indemnity provisions as set forth in a lease as follows: A contract of indemnity whereby the indemnitee is indemnified against the consequences of his own negligence is strictly construed, and such a contract will not be co
  • Roundtree v. New Orleans Aviation Board 844 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    : A contract of indemnity whereby the indemnitee is indemnified against the consequences of his own negligence is strictly construed, and such a contract will not be construed to indemnify an indemnitee again
  • Contranchis v. Travelers Ins. Co. 839 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2003
    1st Cir.1990), affirmed in part, reversed in part (on other grounds), (1991); Ducote v. Liberty Mut.
  • Marien v. General Ins. Co. of America 836 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
  • State ex rel. T.E. 787 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
    1 Cir. 1990), writ granted in part, and ,affirmed in part, reversed in part
  • Cooper v. Lacorte 775 So. 2d 4 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    1 Cir. 1990), writ granted in part, and , affirmed in part, reversed in part
  • Hesse v. Champ Service Line 732 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    (citations omitted), reviewed the rules of interpretation of contracts governing indemnity provisions as set forth in a lease as follows: A contract of indemnity whereby the indemnitee is indemnified against the consequences of his own negligence is strictly construed, and such a contract will not be co
  • Bernard v. Ferrellgas, Inc. 689 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    1 Cir.1990), writs granted, , 365, modified on other grounds, (citations omitted).
  • Achee v. National Tea Co. 686 So. 2d 121 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    The Louisiana Supreme Court, reversed the judgment in favor of Vigilant against the defendants.
  • Fontenot v. Town of Mamou 676 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    the parties agreed as follows: The Lessor hereby covenants and agrees to carry replacement insurance in limits sufficient to rebuild total development including demised premises and does hereby release and discharge the Lessee, its agents, successors and assigns from any and all claims and damages what
  • Wilson v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. 654 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
    1st Cir. 1990), writs granted, , 365, modified on other grounds, and Nelton v. Astro-Lounger Mfg.
  • Hines v. Remington Arms Co., Inc. 648 So. 2d 331 La. 1994
    1st Cir.1990), affirmed in part, reversed in part (on other grounds), Duncan v. Louisiana Power & Light Co., (La.App.
  • Johnston v. Hartford Ins. Co. 623 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    1st Cir.1990), affirmed in part, reversed in part (on other grounds), (1991); Ducote v. Liberty Mut.
  • Sandbom v. Basf Wyandotte Corp. 618 So. 2d 1019 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    Although I do not agree with some of the reasoning of the majority, I
  • Laper v. BOARD OF COM'RS, PORT OF NEW ORLEANS 617 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    Perkins v. Rubicon, Inc.
  • Harris v. West Carroll Parish School Bd. 605 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
    1st Cir.1990), writ granted in part, and , affirmed in part, reversed in part
  • McKinney v. South Cent. Bell Tel. Co. 590 So. 2d 1220 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    Recently, the Louisiana Supreme Court, (La.