Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc., 593 So. 2d 357.
-
Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. v. Browning-Ferris Industries
714 So. 2d 168
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
See, Bruno v. Harbert Int’l Inc.
-
Romero v. Chabillis' Tire Service, Inc.
714 So. 2d 803
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
| sIn Bruno v. Harbert Intern., Inc., -61 (La.1992), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated the following with regard to the claimant’s burden: *805 A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubts upon the worker’s version of the i
-
Thomas v. Town of Arnaudville
713 So. 2d 547
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
See Bruno, ; Alexander v. Pellerin Marble & Granite, 93-1698 (La.1/14/94); ; Henderson v. Pavy, 96-90 (La.App.
-
McDonnell v. Nestle Beverage Co.
714 So. 2d 757
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc.
-
Frantz v. Southern Scrap Material Co.
714 So. 2d 750
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Bruno v. Harbert Int’l Inc., Comeaux v. Sam Broussard Trucking, 94-1631 (La.App.
-
Freeman v. Best Western Richmond Suites Hotel
711 So. 2d 438
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
In Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc., the Supreme Court wrote that the claimant in a workers' compensation action has the burden of proving a work-related accident by a preponderance of the evidence.
-
Porche v. S & M CONST.
711 So. 2d 429
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., McKarry v. Shoney's, 97-144 (La.App.
- Maggard v. Boh Bros. Const. Co. 712 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
-
Woods v. Ryan Chevrolet, Inc.
709 So. 2d 251
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Chitman v. Davison Trucking, 28,073 (La.App.2d Cir. 2/28/96), .
-
City of Kaplan v. Lemaire
708 So. 2d 1230
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
- Fenyes v. Highland Park Medical Center 708 So. 2d 493 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
-
Broussard v. Mobile Home Repairs, Inc.
707 So. 2d 1032
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Matthews v. Taylor Temporary, Inc.
707 So. 2d 1021
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc.
- Cook v. Kaldi's Coffee House 706 So. 2d 1052 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
-
Macro Oil Co. v. Benjamin
702 So. 2d 915
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
- Kortz v. Colt Energy Services, Inc. 698 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
-
McKarry v. SHONEY
698 So. 2d 446
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Davis v. CAJUN BAG AND SUPPLY CO.
698 So. 2d 39
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Inc., : A worker's testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker's version of the incident; and (2) the worker's testimony is corroborated by the circumstances following the alleg
- Moore v. Popeye's Fried Chicken 697 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
-
Fontenot v. JK Richard Trucking
696 So. 2d 176
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., (La.
-
Ball v. Wilco Marsh Buggies, Inc.
695 So. 2d 1075
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Burnworth v. Prime Equipment Co.
698 So. 2d 404
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Bruno v. Harbert Intern’l Inc.
-
Jackson v. Savant Ins. Co.
694 So. 2d 1178
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
- Gordon v. Sandersons Farms 693 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
- Cleveland v. Delhi Guest Home 694 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
-
Malbrew v. Port Barre Mills, Inc.
693 So. 2d 259
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Jackson v. Creger Automotive Co., Inc.
691 So. 2d 824
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Chitman v. Davison Trucking, 28,073 (La.App.2d Cir. 2/28/96), .
-
Johnson v. Apeck Const., Inc.
692 So. 2d 476
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Freeman v. Poulan/Weed Eater, 93-1530, p. 4, Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
- Johnson v. Lake Charles Memorial Hosp. 692 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
-
Beaird Industries, Inc. v. Ebarb
690 So. 2d 866
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Nelson v. Roadway Express, Inc.
-
Bandy v. International Paper Co.
690 So. 2d 902
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Williams v. Jones Truck Lines, Inc., 27,465 (La.App.
-
Davis v. Jennings Manufacturing Co.
689 So. 2d 562
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Bruno v. Harbert, International, Inc., concludes that, while an injured worker is not relieved from establishing a work-related accident by a preponderance of the evidence, the work-related accident requirement must be interpreted liberally and from the perspective of the worker.
- Landry v. City of New Iberia 689 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
-
Wackenhut Corrections Corp. v. Bradley
685 So. 2d 661
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Inc., concluded that the determination of whether an accident occurred is *664 to be construed in favor of the injured employee.
-
Bolden v. Jeffrey's Steel Co., Inc.
684 So. 2d 1102
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Broussard v. U.S. Fire Insurance Co.
685 So. 2d 494
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Bruno v. Harbert Int’l Inc.
- Watkins v. Asphalt Associates, Inc. 685 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
- Charles v. South Cent. Industries 683 So. 2d 706 La. 1996
-
Aymond v. RJ Jones & Sons
690 So. 2d 769
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
23:1031 requires a worker's compensation claimant to initially establish "`personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.'" Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Washington v. Lyons Specialty Co.
683 So. 2d 367
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
1/14/94); ; Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Coats v. American Tel. & Tel. Co.
681 So. 2d 1243
La. 1996
As this Court stated in Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., a worker's testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge his burden of proving that an accident occurred, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker's version of the incident; and (2) the worker's testimony is corroborated by the circumstanc
-
Clifton v. RAPIDES REGIONAL MED. CENTER
689 So. 2d 471
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., (La.
- Elswick v. Highway Transport 680 So. 2d 1364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- Kendrix v. Read Lumber & Supply Co. 680 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
-
Louviere v. Woodson Construction Co.
679 So. 2d 1013
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
-
Jackson v. American Mut. Liability Ins. Co.
676 So. 2d 716
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Bruno v. Harbert Intn'l, Inc.
-
Simon v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.
678 So. 2d 85
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Bruno v. Harbert Intern., Inc.
-
Faul v. Bonin
678 So. 2d 627
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
2 Cir.1990); Bruno v. Harbert Intern., Inc., (La.
- Cain v. Aquarius Builders, Inc. 680 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
-
Rivera v. West Jefferson Medical Center
678 So. 2d 602
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
supra; Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.