DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bruno v. Harbert Intern. Inc., 593 So. 2d 357.

834 citing documents.

  • Linzie Morse v. Big Tex Trailers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
  • Edward R. Bethel v. Lake City Trucking La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    In Bruno v. Harbert Int’l Inc., (citations omitted), with regard to an unwitnessed accident, the supreme court stated: A worker‟s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker‟s versio
  • Dana Gary v. St. Landry Security Guard Services, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    DISCUSSION In Bruno v. Harbert Int’l. Inc., -61 (La.1992), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: As a threshold requirement, a worker in a compensation action must establish “personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.” LSA-R.S.
  • Bethel v. Lake City Trucking 87 So. 3d 338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    In Bruno v. Harbert Int’l Inc., (citations omitted), with regard to an unwitnessed accident, the supreme court stated: A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker’s version of the incident; a
  • Morse v. Big Tex Trailers 90 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc., (La.
  • Gary v. St. Landry Security Guard Services, Inc. 95 So. 3d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Inc., -61 (La.1992), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: As a threshold requirement, a worker in a compensation action must establish “personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.” LSA-R.S.
  • James Smith v. City of Vidalia La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    Bruno [v. Harbert Int’l, Inc., ]….
  • Smith v. City of Vidalia 86 So. 3d 157 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    Bruno [v. Harbert Int’l, Inc., ]....
  • Viney J. Silas v. Sowela Technical College La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -800, writs denied, 06- 585 (La.5/5/06), -636 (La.5/5/06), noted the following: The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no
  • Silas v. Sowela Technical College 84 So. 3d 710 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
    3 Cir. 12/30/05), -800 , writs denied, 06-585 (La.5/5/06), , 06-636 (La.5/5/06), , noted the following: The Louisiana Supreme Court, expounded on what proof will satisfy an employee’s burden in proving a work-related injury: A worker’s testimony alone may be sufficient to discharge this burden of proof, provided two elements are satisfied: (1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker’s version of the incid
  • Johnson v. T & J Hauling Co. 86 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., Authement v. Wal-Mart, 2002-2434 (La.App.
  • Lopez v. Marques Food Distributors 80 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
  • Hirstius v. Tropicare Service, LLC 80 So. 3d 1215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • Terry Rideaux v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    23:1031(A); Bruno v. Harbert Int’l Inc.
  • Lake Charles Memorial Hospital (Isom T. Roy) v. City of Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
  • George Keith Day v. Superior Derrick Services La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., [ ] (citing West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., Malone and Johnson, 13 Civil Law Treatise, Workers’ Compensation, Section 253 (2d Ed.1980)).
  • Day v. Superior Derrick Services 80 So. 3d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., [ ] (citing West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., Malone and Johnson, 13 Civil Law Treatise, Workers’ Compensation, Section 253 (2d Ed.1980)).
  • Rideaux v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. 80 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • Roy v. City of Lake Charles 81 So. 3d 53 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
  • Nivens v. Fields 79 So. 3d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • Brandon v. Motors Liquidation Co. 79 So. 3d 454 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., Authement v. Wal-Mart, 2002-2434 (La.App.
  • Henry Marange, Jr. v. Custom Metal Fabricators, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
  • Marange v. Custom Metal Fabricators, Inc. 75 So. 3d 990 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • Morgan v. Glazers Wholesale Drug Co. 79 So. 3d 417 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc., Alexander v. Brookshire Grocery Co., 42,855 (La.App.2d Cir.1/9/08), , writ denied, 08-0503 (La.4/25/08), .
  • Ricks v. Odyssey Health Care 77 So. 3d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    As we noted in Bruno [Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., ], corroboration of the worker’s testimony may be provided by the testimony of fellow workers, spouses, or friends, or by medical evidence.
  • Raymond Hymes, Jr. v. Congregation of the Immaculate Conception La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
  • Hymes v. Congregation of the Immaculate Conception 75 So. 3d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc.
  • David Harrell v. Brookshire Grocery Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    23:1031(A); Bruno v. Harbert Int’l Inc.
  • Harrell v. Brookshire Grocery Co. 73 So. 3d 416 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    23:1031(A); Bruno v. Harbert Int’l Inc.
  • Duran v. Turner Industries Group, LLC 70 So. 3d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., (citing West v. Bayou Vista Manor, Inc., ).
  • Davenport v. Foster Farms, L.L.C. 69 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • Mayes v. DEEP SOUTH CHEMICAL, INC. 66 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    See Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc., (La.
  • Ralph Mayes v. Deep South Chemical, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    See Bruno v. Harbert Int’l., Inc.
  • Dorrie Bell v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
  • Danielle C. Garrick v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    Proving an Unwitnessed Accident and/or Injury “As a threshold requirement, a worker in a compensation action must establish ‘personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.’” Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc., (emphasis added) (quoting La.R.S.
  • Bell v. Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc. 68 So. 3d 1174 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc.
  • Garrick v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 66 So. 3d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Proving an Unwitnessed Accident and/or Injury “As a threshold requirement, a worker in a compensation action must es *597 tablish ‘personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.’ ” Bruno v. Harbert Int’l, Inc., (emphasis added) (quoting La.R.S.
  • Mayes v. Deep South Chemical, Inc. 66 So. 3d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    See Bruno v. Harbert Int'l, Inc.
  • Faulkner v. Better Services, Inc. 67 So. 3d 646 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
  • Dawson v. Terrebonne General Medical Center 69 So. 3d 622 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
  • Wright v. TOWN OF OIL CITY 71 So. 3d 962 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    A claimant’s testimony alone may be sufficient to establish an accident provided that “(1) no other evidence discredits or casts serious doubt upon the worker’s version of the incident, and (2) the worker’s testimony is corroborated by the circumstances following the alleged incident.” Bruno v. Harbert Intern., Inc., Hofler, supra.
  • Tusa v. City of Kenner Police Department 64 So. 3d 904 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    Id., citing Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc.
  • David Burkett v. Lfi Fort Pierce, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    23:1021(1) as “an unexpected or unforseen actual, identifiable, precipitous event happening suddenly or violently, with or without human fault, and directly producing at the time objective findings of an injury which is more than simply a gradual deterioration or progressive degeneration.” In Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., (citations omitted), the supreme court explained the claimant’s burden of establishing an accident as follows: 2 [T]he plaintiff-worker in a compensation action has the
  • Burkett v. LFI Fort Pierce, Inc. 63 So. 3d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    23:1021(1) as “an unexpected or unforeseen actual, identifiable, precipitous event happening suddenly or violently, with or without human fault, and directly producing at the time objective findings of an injury which is more than simply a gradual deterioration or progressive degeneration.” In Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., (citations omitted), the supreme court explained the claimant’s burden of establishing an accident as follows: 13[T]he plaintiff-worker in a compensation action has th
  • Christopher Green v. National Oilwell Varco La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    23:1031(A); Bruno v. Harbert Int’l Inc.
  • Green v. NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO 63 So. 3d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    23:1031(A); Bruno v. Harbert Int’l Inc.
  • Biscamp v. Sysco East Texas 63 So. 3d 1097 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
    Bruno v. Harbert Intemation *1099 al, Inc.
  • Dombrowski v. PATTERSON-UTI DRILLING COMPANY, LLC 63 So. 3d 308 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • Hofler v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. 57 So. 3d 1128 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
  • Ardoin v. Firestone Polymers, L.L.C. 56 So. 3d 215 La. 2011
    We granted the employer’s writ application to review the correctness of the appellate court’s judgment and its application of Bruno v. Harbert International, Inc., and the manifest error standard of review.