Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lima v. Schmidt, 595 So. 2d 624.
- Miley v. Consolidated Gravity Drainage Dist. No. 1 642 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
- Sessions & Fishman v. Liquid Air Corp. 642 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
-
Smith v. McKeller
638 So. 2d 1192
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
the supreme court recognized that suspension, interruption, and renunciation are the three theories under Louisiana law upon which a plaintiff may rely to establish that the claim is not barred by prescription.
- Louisiana Health Service v. Tarver 635 So. 2d 1090 La. 1994
-
Wimberly v. Gatch
635 So. 2d 206
La. 1994
1993); Foster v. Breaux, 263 La.
-
Martinez v. Breaux Mart, Inc.
631 So. 2d 471
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Respondent concedes that she had the burden of proof to overcome the exceptions in this case, Flowers v. U.S.F.
- Fontaine v. Roman Catholic Church 625 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
- Bank of Jena v. Robbie's Auto Body, Inc. 621 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- Jure v. Barker 619 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
-
Bouterie v. Crane
616 So. 2d 657
La. 1993
Foster v. Breaux, 263 La.
- Ward v. Abasi 616 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Bishop v. Simonton 615 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
-
Roger v. Dufrene
613 So. 2d 947
La. 1993
Very recently, affirmed the rule that an action for professional malpractice is a delictual action governed by the prescriptive period of one year except (1) when the attorney expressly warrants a specific result and fails to obtain that result, or (2) when the attorney agrees to perform certain work and does nothing
- Waller v. Stuckey 613 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
- Williams v. Sewerage & Water Bd. of NO 611 So. 2d 1383 La. 1993
- Red River Valley Bank v. Home Ins. Co. 607 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
- Bustamento v. Tucker 607 So. 2d 532 La. 1992
-
Michel v. Lee
597 So. 2d 1191
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Since it is prescribed on its face she has the burden “to show why the claim has not prescribed.”
- Teague v. Scott 597 So. 2d 1060 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992