Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lima v. Schmidt, 595 So. 2d 624.

269 citing documents.

Explained Acosta v. Campbell 744 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Femovich and Campbell respond, however, that the "continuing relationship doctrine" is but an application of the third category of contra non valentum, -30 (La.1992).
Estate of Patout v. City of New Iberia 738 So. 2d 544 La. 1999
art. 3449; Board of Levee Comm'rs v. Newport, Ltd., (La.App.
Crump v. Sabine River Authority 737 So. 2d 720 La. 1999
Hill v. Hathaway 741 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
King v. Phelps Dunbar, LLP 743 So. 2d 181 La. 1999
Foster v. Breaux, 263 La.
Chinn v. Mitchell 734 So. 2d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Sadler v. Midboe 723 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Morgan v. Moulder 727 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Layman v. City of New Orleans 753 So. 2d 254 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. 726 So. 2d 926 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Prejean v. Industrial Cleanup, Inc. 721 So. 2d 1273 La. 1998
First National Bank of Commerce v. Band 727 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Brown v. American Nat. Property & Cas. Co. 720 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Latter v. ABC Ins. Co. 719 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Webb v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana 711 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Webb v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of La. 711 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Latter v. ABC Insurance 708 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
rther provides that even as to actions filed within one year of discovery “in all events such actions shall be filed at the latest within three years from the date of the alleged act, omission or neglect.” In Reeder , the Supreme Court held that the one and three year time periods are peremptive, cannot be suspended or interrupted, and thus the “continuous representation” is no longer applicable.
Romaguera v. Overby 709 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Causby v. Perque Floor Covering 707 So. 2d 23 La. 1998
Wilkes v. Carroll 704 So. 2d 938 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Reeder v. North 701 So. 2d 1291 La. 1997
the court of appeal held that "[w]hile there exists an ongoing, continuous and dependent relationship between the client and the attorney and the attorney is seeking to rectify the alleged act of malpractice, the malpractice action is premature."
Perez v. Shook 703 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Bourque v. Hoychick 704 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Security National Partners v. Kothe 703 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
as authority for its contention that the numerous communications between the defendants and the FDIC constituted implicit or tacit acknowledgment because the defendants did not expressly deny that the debt was owed.
Paragon Development Group, Inc. v. Skeins 700 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94); ; Foster v. Breaux, 263 La.
Jones, Walker, Waechter, Poitevent, Carrere and Denegre, LLP v. Homestead Ins. Co. 700 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
628 n. 2 (La.1992); (La.App.
Robideau v. Johnson 702 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Niklaus v. Bellina 696 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Bridges v. Bridges 692 So. 2d 1186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
"renunciation is the technical term designating the abandonment of rights derived from prescription that has accrued."
Taussig v. Leithead 689 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State Ex Rel. Ieyoub v. Bordens, Inc. 684 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Wimberly v. Gatch, 93-2361 (La.4/11/94)
Reeder v. North 683 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Gary v. Camden Fire Ins. Co. 676 So. 2d 553 La. 1996
Hendrick v. STONE, PIGMAN, WALTHER, ETC. 677 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Further, plaintiff's claim was suspended during his representation by defendants under the doctrine of contra non valentem because of the `"
Marsh Engineering, Inc. v. Parker 688 So. 2d 1042 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Sotomayor v. Lewis 673 So. 2d 1201 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Phillip v. Home Ins. Co. 671 So. 2d 943 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Allen v. Carollo 674 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Huger v. SEWERAGE AND WATER BD. 672 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Gary v. Camden Fire Ins. Co. 665 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Smith v. Boothe 669 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Furthermore, even though Boothe's continued representation of the couple suspended prescription until his termination on December 2, 1991, [2] the time limit for bringing suit ran long before plaintiffs instituted their action on November 3, 1993.
Caillet v. Dykstra 666 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Wright v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp. 662 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Hosp. Serv. Dist. No. 1 v. Alas 657 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Settoon Marine, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. 657 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Boyd v. BBC Brown Boveri, Inc. 656 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Dolese v. Harvey 649 So. 2d 100 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Griffin v. Audubon Ins. Co. 649 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Phillips v. Palumbo 648 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Mrs. Palumbo further argues that courts are required to strictly construe prescriptive statutes against finding that a case has prescribed and in favor of maintaining the cause of action, (La.App.
Huckabee v. Sunshine Homes 647 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994