Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., 616 So. 2d 1234.

559 citing documents.

Gr Restaurants, LLC v. Suzanne Savoy Santillo, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
ANALYSIS “The function of an exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords a remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading.” Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
GR Rests., LLC v. Suzanne Savoy Santillo, LLC 275 So. 3d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc. , , 1235 (La.1993).
Betancourt v. Trahan 274 So. 3d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
Amy L. Betancourt v. Marcus Trahan D/B/A Redmarque Construction,llc La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
In re Shell 274 So. 3d 872 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South , , 1235 (La.
Reyer v. Milton Homes, LLC 272 So. 3d 604 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc. , , 1235 (La.
Ramos v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co. 262 So. 3d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
App. 4 Cir. 6/27/07), , 492 (citing Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc. , , 1235-36 (La.
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Richard D. Schales A/K/A Richard Dewy Schales La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
If the petition states a cause of action as to any ground or portion of the demand, the exception of no cause of action generally should be overruled.” Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Schales 261 So. 3d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc. , , 1236 (La.1993).
Global Mktg. Solutions, L. L.C. v. Blue Mill Farms, Inc. 267 So. 3d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., , 1235 (La.
Williams v. Wood 258 So. 3d 834 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc. , , 1236 (La.
Regions Bank v. Keys 257 So. 3d 1266 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2/22/07), , 646 ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc. , , 1238 (La.
Tracer Sec. Servs., Inc. v. Ledet 259 So. 3d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., , 1235 (La.
Cole v. Cole 264 So. 3d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., , 1235 (La.
Llopis v. La. State Bd. of Dentistry 255 So. 3d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc. , , 1235-36 (La.
Green v. Garcia-Victor 248 So. 3d 449 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
2/18/11), , 706, quoting Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South,Inc. , , 1235 (La.
Billeaudeau v. Opelousas Gen. Hosp. Auth. 243 So. 3d 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Indeed, recognizing a separate cause of action, although *142 related to the previous occurrence, has been addressed by the supreme court in Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., , 1238, n.5 (La.
Verret v. Johnson 250 So. 3d 269 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., , 1241 (La.
State v. Astra Zeneca AB 249 So. 3d 38 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., , 1236 (La.
A.M.C. v. James D. Caldwell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
A.M.C. v. Caldwell 239 So. 3d 948 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc. , , 1235 (La.1993).
State v. Teva Pharm. Indus., Ltd. 242 So. 3d 597 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., , 1239 (La.
Spinks Constr., Inc. v. Quad States Constr., LLC 240 So. 3d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
See Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., , 1238 (La.
Vance v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n 235 So. 3d 1263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
James v. Eldorado Casino Shreveport Joint Venture 245 So. 3d 264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Advanced Radiographics, Inc. v. Colony Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Advanced Radiographics, Inc. v. Colony Insurance Co. 227 So. 3d 856 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Mathes v. Faucheux 226 So. 3d 503 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
3/19/04), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
Gbb Properties Two, LLC v. Stirling Properties, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
GBB Properties Two, LLC v. Stirling Properties, LLC 224 So. 3d 1001 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
England v. England 223 So. 3d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
“The court reviews the petition and accepts all well pleaded allegations of fact as true, and the issue at the trial of the exception is whether, on the face of the petition, the plaintiff is entitled to the relief sought.” Meckstroth , 07-0326 at p. 2, 962 So.2d at 492 (citing Everything on’Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., -36 (La.
J. A. Davis Properties, LLC v. Martin Operating Partnership, Lp La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
Dillon v. Toys R Us-Delaware Corp. 221 So. 3d 876 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
See Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Roubion Shoring Co. v. Crescent Shoring, L.L.C. 222 So. 3d 921 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
Mary Fisher v. the Town of Boyce La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Fisher v. Town of Boyce 219 So. 3d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Jenkins v. Jackson 216 So. 3d 1082 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
Id, citing Everything on Wheels Subaru, (La.
Foster-Somerled Enterprises, LLC v. St. Paul's Episcopal Church 212 So. 3d 1191 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., 6Inc., (La.
Michael Carl Clary, Et Ux. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. Etc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
olations, the Court also notes Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc., “if there are two or more items of damages or theories of recovery which arise out of the operative facts of a single transaction or occurrence, a partial judgment on an exception of no cause of action should not be rendered to dismiss one item of damages or theory of recovery.” (La.
Clary v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 204 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
of action for both alleged violations, the Court also notes Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc., “if there are two or more items of damages or theories of recovery which arise out of the operative facts of a single transaction or occurrence, a partial judgment on an *1107 exception of no cause of action should not be rendered to dismiss one item of damages or theory of recovery.” (La.
Ashley v. State 209 So. 3d 978 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc., (La.
Robinson v. Wayne & Beverly Papania & Pyrenees Investments, LLC 207 So. 3d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Bailey v. Knatt 207 So. 3d 407 La. 2016
See Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
Yokum v. 544 Funky, LLC 202 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3rd Cir.1980), writ denied, Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc., (abrogated by Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Herman v. Tracage Development, L.L.C. 201 So. 3d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
3/19/04), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
Jarrett v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & Corrections 197 So. 3d 218 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc., v. Subaru South, Inc.
Landis Construction Co. v. Regional Transit Authority 195 So. 3d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
y raises the question of whether a cause of action has matured to the point that is ripe for judicial determination, the exception of no cause of action “tests ‘the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords a remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading.’ ” Moreno , 10-2268 at p. 3, 64 So.3d at 762 -63 (quoting Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., ).
Lawrence v. Lawrence 197 So. 3d 198 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
An exception of no cause of action tests “the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords ¿'remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading.” Moreno v. Entergy Corp., 2010-2268 (La.02/18/11), , citing Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Wiles v. Wiles 193 So. 3d 397 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
681 and 927; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., et al.
Patriot Contstruction & Equipment,llc v. Rage Logistics, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.