Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., 616 So. 2d 1234.

559 citing documents.

Patriot Construction & Equipment, LLC v. Rage Logistics, LLC 215 So. 3d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
Foret v. Caruso 194 So. 3d 643 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Eugene J. Sonnier, II v. the Catholic Foundation of the Diocese of Lafayette La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
Sonnier v. Catholic Foundation of the Diocese of Lafayette 215 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
Executone Systems Co. of La. v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District No. 2 186 So. 3d 1210 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2016
Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774 (La.2/22/07), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Wegmann v. Tramontin 186 So. 3d 236 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2016
4 Cir. 6/27/07), , citing Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., -36 (La.
Cochran v. Caruso 182 So. 3d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Hanson v. Steven Caruso, Willow Creek, L.L.C. 182 So. 3d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
A' cause of action, when used in the context of the per&hptory exception, is defined as the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiffs right to judicially assert the action against the defendant Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Christopher Cloud v. Emily Dean La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
2/18/11), (quoting Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc., ).
Cloud v. Dean 181 So. 3d 936 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
761, 762 (quoting Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc., ).
Patrick Jeansonne v. City of Marksville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
Jeansonne v. City of Marksville 180 So. 3d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
Beebe v. Larche 184 So. 3d 729 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Russel Mier v. Gregory Russel Mier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Everything on Wheels Subaru, (La.
Mier v. Mier 178 So. 3d 270 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Everything on Wheels Subaru
McCarthy v. Evolution Petroleum Corp. 180 So. 3d 252 La. 2015
Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
John C. McCarthy, Individually and as Trustee of the Kathleen McCarthy Balden Trust, and Majorie M. Moss v. … La. 2015
Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
Kirby v. Poydras Center, LLC 176 So. 3d 601 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
Denham Homes, LLC v. Teche Federal Bank 182 So. 3d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Everything on Wheels Subaru,, Inc. v. Subam South., Inc.
MR Pittman Group, LLC v. Plaquemines Parish Government 176 So. 3d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc., 5 see also Favrot, 10-0986, pp. 6-7 (La.App, 4 Cir. 2/9/11), 68 So.3d at 1104 ; Alex v. Rayne Concrete Service, 05-1457, p. 7 (La.1/26/07), , 145 n. 5, and Everything On Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (“Any party may apply for supervisory writs by showing that an immediate review may materially advance the termination of the litigation.”).
Holly D. Swayze v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company 172 So. 3d 1026 La. 2015
12 Benoit, 00-0424 at7, 773 So.2d at 706, quoting Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
Richard L. Reynolds v. Robert J. Bordelon III, Robert J. Bordelon Jr., Usagencies Casualty Insurance Company, Automobile Club … La. 2015
8 Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Succession of Scheuermann ex rel. Gonzalez v. Scheuermann & Jones LLC ex rel. Jones 171 So. 3d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
We also ensure that our courts operate under principles of sound judicial administration to promote judicial efficiency and economy.”); see also ’Everything On Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru *978 South, Inc., -1241 (La.1993).
Durden v. Durden 165 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
An exception of no cause of action tests “the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords a *1142 remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading.” Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
State v. McDowell 166 So. 3d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Scott v. Zaheri 157 So. 3d 779 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
2 See Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru *783 South
Loan Partners, LLC v. PTC Family Investments, LLC 157 So. 3d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
4 Cir. 6/27/07), , citing Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., -36 (La.1993).
Latoya Castille, Individually v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
Castille v. Louisiana Medical Mutual Ins. Co. 150 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru -S., Inc.
Kenneth John Lecompte, Et Ux. v. Afc Enterprises, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Hawkins
Scott Mahfouz v. Thomas D. Davenport, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
“The function of an exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords a remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading.” Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
Lecompte v. AFC Enterprises, Inc. 149 So. 3d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Hawkins, .
Mahfouz v. Davenport 149 So. 3d 845 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
“The function of an exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords a remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading.” Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
Castillo v. Normand 159 So. 3d 485 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2014
Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774 (La.2/22/07), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Maw Enterprises, L.L.C. v. City of Marksville 149 So. 3d 210 La. 2014
Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP, 06-1774, p. 4 (La.2/22/07), , citing Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Lafayette Care Center v. Betty Mouton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
DISCUSSION “The function of an exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords a remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading.” Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
Cox v. O'Brien 147 So. 3d 809 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
In Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc., the Louisiana Supreme Court explained the law on the exception of no cause of action and stated: The function of an exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords a remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading.
Lafayette Care Center v. Mouton 146 So. 3d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
DISCUSSION “The function of an exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords a remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading.” Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
In Re: Angela Marie Costanza and Chasity Shanelle Brewer La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
681 and 927; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., et al.
Betty Sinegal v. Lafayette Parish Sheriff's Office La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
It poses the question “whether the law affords a remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading.” [Everything on Wheels Subaru v. Subaru South, Inc., ].
Sinegal v. Lafayette Parish Sheriff's Office 139 So. 3d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
It poses the question “whether the law affords a remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading.” [Everything on Wheels Subaru v. Subaru South, Inc., ].
Williams v. Nelson 136 So. 3d 793 La. 2014
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Black Water Marsh, LLC v. Roger C. Ferriss Properties, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc., (La.
Black Water Marsh, LLC v. Roger C. Ferriss Properties, Inc. 130 So. 3d 968 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance v. Pacorini Metals, USA, L.L.C. 131 So. 3d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
Robert Hollier v. Louis J. Perret La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
Marti Elizabeth Simon v. Ronald Theriot, Sheriff La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
Simon v. Theriot 127 So. 3d 1057 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
Timothy Cormier v. McNeese State University La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
“The function of an exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords a remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading.” Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
Stanley Savoie v. Calcasieu Parish Sheriff Office La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.