Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., 616 So. 2d 1234.

559 citing documents.

  • Bayou Lib. Ass'n v. St. Tammany Par. Coun. 938 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Walsh & Bailey v. Lofaso 938 So. 2d 999 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299 (La.3/19/04), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Head v. Continental Cas. Co. 931 So. 2d 1192 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru, Inc.
  • Stewart Head v. Continental Casualty Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru, Inc.
  • Lazaro v. New Orleans Brass 933 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Severn Place v. American Bldg. Services 930 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Leboeuf v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 934 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., Rebardi v. Crewboats, Inc., XXXX-XXXX (La.App.
  • Almerico v. Dale 927 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Explained Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 929 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    *764 Stating a Cause of Action As explained in Johnson , cited above, the Louisiana Supreme Court, in Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., defined a cause of action in the context of a peremptory exception of no cause of action [1] as "the operative facts that give rise to the plaintiff's right to judicially assert the action against the defendant."
  • Badeaux v. Southwest Computer Bureau, Inc. 929 So. 2d 1211 La. 2006
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Kimberly Johnson v. City of Pineville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Johnson v. City of Pineville 924 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Lee v. Constar, Inc. 921 So. 2d 1240 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
    See: Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Ralph v. City of New Orleans 921 So. 2d 988 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Block v. Bernard, Cassisa, Elliott & Davis 927 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Everything On Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Bibeau v. Forest Manor Nursing Home 917 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
  • Johansen v. LA. HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASS'N 916 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Everything On Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., Hand v. Hand, 99-2420, p. 4 (La.App.
  • Johansen v. Louisiana High School Athletic Ass'n 916 So. 2d 1081 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Everything On Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., Hand v. Hand, 99-2420, p. 4 (La.App.
  • Jackson v. Home Depot, Inc. 906 So. 2d 721 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
  • Hennig v. Alltel Communications, Inc. 903 So. 2d 1137 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • James v. Ocean National, L.L.C. 905 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Based thereon, our job is to determine “whether, on the face of the petition, the plaintiff is legally entitled to the relief sought.” Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Dianne Bates v. Robert C. King La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Bates v. King 899 So. 2d 202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Everything on Wheels Subaru,, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Glod v. Baker 899 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    The supreme court explained the cause of action concept in Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., , as follows: *654 this court defined cause of action as "an act by a defendant which gives a plaintiff a right to invoke judicial interference on his behalf."
  • Walter A. Glod, Jr., M.D. v. W. Gregory Baker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    The supreme court explained the cause of action concept in Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., as follows: this court defined cause of action as “an act by a defendant which gives a plaintiff a right to invoke judicial interference on his behalf.” The court pointed out the difference between a demand, w
  • Van Meter v. Gutierrez 897 So. 2d 781 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
  • Rebardi v. Crewboats, Inc. 906 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., Copeland v. Treasure Chest Casino, L.L.C., XXXX-XXXX, p. 3 (La.App.
  • Rebardi v. Crewboats, Inc. 906 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., Copeland v. Treasure Chest Casino, L.L.C., XXXX-XXXX, p. 3 (La.App.
  • COTTONPORT BANK v. DD Group, Inc. 893 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • The Cottonport Bank v. Dd Group, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Baker v. LSU HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER 889 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
  • Dixon v. Bohn 890 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • John Gordon v. Century 21 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
  • Gordon v. Century 21 888 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., Hawkins, .
  • Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 890 So. 2d 579 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Paternostro v. Ocean Technical Services, Inc. 887 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Hall v. Zen-Noh Grain Corp., 01-0324 (La.4/27/01), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., Hero Lands Co. v. Texaco, Inc.
  • Marsh Engineering, Inc. v. Ernest L. Parker La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
  • Marsh Engineering Inc. v. Parker 883 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
  • URBAN PROPERTY CO. v. Pioneer Credit Co. 882 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Spencer v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 887 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., this court stated that the term “cause of action,” as used in the context of the peremptory exception of no cause of action, means “the operative facts which give rise to the plaintiffs right to judicially assert the action against the defendant.” Benoit, 773 So.2d at 706 (footnote omitted).
  • Spencer v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 887 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    In Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., this court stated that the term "cause of action," as used in the context of the peremptory exception of no cause of action, means "the operative facts which give rise to the plaintiff's right to judicially assert the action against the defendant."
  • Bobby and Ray Williams Partnership, LLP v. SHREVEPORT HAYRIDE CO. LLC 873 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., Western Development Group, Inc. v. Shlosman, 32,343 (La.App.2d Cir.9/22/99), .
  • In re Harvey Term Litigation 872 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Ramey v. DeCaire 869 So. 2d 114 La. 2004
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Simons Petroleum, Inc. v. Falgout 873 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., -37 (La.1993).
  • Gibson v. State 866 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
    citing, Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Errol Ebey v. Avoyelles Parish School Board and State of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Hawkins
  • Ebey v. Avoyelles Parish School Bd. 861 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Hawkins, .
  • Opel P. Teasley v. Charles K. Ates La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    In Everything on Wheels, Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., the supreme court instructed: The function of an exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords a remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading.
  • Teasley v. Ates 861 So. 2d 778 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    In Everything on Wheels, Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., the supreme court instructed: The function of an exception of no cause of action is to test the legal sufficiency of the petition by determining whether the law affords a remedy on the facts alleged in the pleading.