DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., 616 So. 2d 1234.

559 citing documents.

  • Guidry v. Hanover Insurance Co. 28 So. 3d 426 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, (La.
  • Timmy Hawkins v. Rapides Parish Police Jury La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    “A judgment maintaining an exception of no 3 cause of action and dismissing the action completely is a final judgment which is appealable.” Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Ryan William Price v. Randy J. Fuerst La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    In Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., the supreme court described the court’s task in considering an exception of no cause of action as follows: “[T]he court reviews the petition and accepts well pleaded allegations of fact as true, and the issue at the trial of the exception is whether, on the face of the petition, the plaintiff is le
  • Hawkins v. Rapides Parish Police Jury 24 So. 3d 1036 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Price v. Fuerst 24 So. 3d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    In Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Suban South, Inc., the supreme court described the court’s task in considering an exception of no cause of action as follows: “[T]he court reviews the petition and accepts well pleaded allegations of fact as true, and the issue at the trial of the exception is whether, on the face of the petition, the plaintiff is legal
  • Foti v. Holliday 27 So. 3d 813 La. 2009
    681 and 927; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., et al.
  • Scp Distributors, LLC. v. Jsb Northpark, LLC 24 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
  • Sundown Express, Inc. v. Gonzales 27 So. 3d 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Everything on Wheels Subaru
  • 831 Bartholomew Investments-A, L.L.C. v. Margulis 20 So. 3d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Watkins v. Cheatham 19 So. 3d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Tuban Petroleum, L.L.C. v. SIARC, Inc. 11 So. 3d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    “Based thereon, our job is to determine ‘whether, on the face of the petition, the plaintiff is legally entitled to the relief sought.’ ” Id., quoting Everything on Wheels Subaru v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Kuebel v. Department of Wildlife & Fisheries 14 So. 3d 20 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Based thereon, our job is to determine “whether, on the face of the petition, the plaintiff is legally entitled to the relief sought.” Everything on Wheels Subaru v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Teague v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 10 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Everything On Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Robin Poole v. Wendell E. Poole La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
  • Poole v. Poole 7 So. 3d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
  • Kelley v. Dyson 10 So. 3d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Schmidt v. Schmidt 6 So. 3d 197 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Zurich American Ins. Co. v. QUEEN'S MACHINERY CO., LTD. 8 So. 3d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Everything on Wheels Subaru
  • Friedman v. Louisiana State Board of Dentistry 3 So. 3d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Bell v. Patterson Ins. Co. 999 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., Jackson Parish Bank v. Succession of Meredith, 35,286 (La.App.2d Cir.10/31/01), , writ denied, 02-0004 (La.03/15/02), .
  • Benard v. EAGLE, INC. 1 So. 3d 588 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    r to a full and fair trial on those theories of recovery which ought to have survived the decision, is disconcerting insofar as it is a prime example of the undesirability and confusion of piecemeal appeals that Justice Kimball and former Justice Lemmon decried in their dissents in Douglass, supra, as well as that Justice Lemmon presaged in Everything On Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Bernberg v. Strauss 999 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    Everything on Wheels Subaru v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Ourso v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 998 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., Copeland v. Treasure Chest Casino, LLC., XXXX-XXXX, p. 3 (La.App.
  • William E. Peters v. Allen Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
  • Peters v. Allen Parish School Bd. 996 So. 2d 1230 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru S., Inc.
  • Parker v. Stalder 993 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
  • MJ Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp. 998 So. 2d 16 La. 2008
    According to Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., a cause of action exists if there are "operative facts which give rise to the plaintiff's right to judicially assert the action against the defendant."
  • East Baton Rouge Parish School Board v. Wilson 992 So. 2d 537 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    Everything on Wheels Subaru,, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Turner v. Law Firm of Wolff & Wolff 986 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
    See, e.g., Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Narriman Fakier v. State of La., Board of Supervisory for Univ. of La. System La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    As stated in Everything On Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South Inc.[,] if all partial judgments relating to only some claims or defenses or less than all parties were routinely appealed, “there would be intolerable problems of multiple appeals and piecemeal litigation.” On the other hand, it was also recognized i
  • Fakier v. STATE, BD. OF SUP'RS FOR UNIV. 983 So. 2d 1024 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    As stated in Everything On Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South Inc. [,] if all partial judgments relating to only some claims or defenses or less than all parties were routinely appealed, "there would be intolerable problems of multiple appeals and piecemeal litigation."
  • Sullivan v. Sullivan 976 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Richard Hargett v. Estate of Daniel N. Hargett, Sr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Hargett v. ESTATE OF HARGETT 977 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Paul Nicholls Debaillon, Bankruptcy Trustee v. Consolidated Operating Co., Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • DeBaillon v. Consolidated Operating Co. 975 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Winder v. George 973 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
  • Century Ready Mix Corp. v. Boyte 968 So. 2d 893 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Hines v. Hines 968 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Barton v. Barton 965 So. 2d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Associated Acquisitions v. CARBONE PROP. 962 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    at 1201 (citing Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., ).
  • Associated Acquisitions, L.L.C. v. Carbone Properties of Audubon, L.L.C. 962 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
    at 1201 (citing Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., ).
  • Meckstroth v. La. Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 962 So. 2d 490 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., -36 (La.1993); (La.
  • Brookewood v. Sixty-Three Twenty-Four 958 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Jamison v. D'AMICO 955 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., (La.
  • Wright v. Louisiana Power & Light 951 So. 2d 1058 La. 2007
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLP 950 So. 2d 641 La. 2007
    Ramey v. DeCaire, 03-1299, p. 7 (La.3/19/04), ; Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Gauthreaux v. New Orleans City Park Improvement Ass'n 941 So. 2d 627 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Everything on Wheels, Subaru v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • WJ Spano Co., Inc. v. Mitchell 943 So. 2d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.
  • Johnson v. Orleans Parish School Board 938 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc., 1991-2708 (La.1993), .