Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Watts, 579 So. 2d 931.

244 citing documents.

Taylor S. Southern and Ashley M. Southern, Individually and on Behalf of Their Minor Child, Matthew Taylor Southern. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State of Louisiana v. Billy Ray Ford, Jr. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
Jordan Jones Favret v. John Favret, Kathy Favret, Justin Phipps Boyce, and Madison Gallo Boyce La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Jena Rougeau v. Hospital Service District 2 of Beauregard Parish La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
(La.1991 Davis v. Witt, 02-1119, p. 13 (La.
Faith in Farming Company, L.L.C. v. State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development Consolidated with … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
Suzanne Farrell And Joseph Farrell v. Circle K La. 2023
E.g.,Caserta,12-0853 at p. 1, 90 So.3d at 1043; Dauzat, 08-0528 at p. 4, 995 So.2d at 1186; Hutchinson, 03-1533 at p. 9, 866 So.2d at 234; Pitre, 95-1466 at p. 7, 673 So.2d at 589
CD Individually and as Tutor of His Minor Child SD v. SC, Individually and as the Parent and … La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2022
Gerald P. Snyder, Gavin P. Snyder and Tommy A. Guidry, Jr., All as Proper Representatives of the Decedent, … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Synikia Hester Individually And On Behalf Of Kunta La. 2021
Lemann, 923 So.2d at 633; (La.
Lovie Marshall, as curator obo Ezekiel Blakes, Sr., and Ezekiel Blakes, Jr. and Tashall Jones, individually v. Jean … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Sherome Hankton v. The State Of Louisiana, Medical Center Of Louisiana At New Orleans (university Hospital), Through The … La. 2020
Accordingly, apportionment of fault requires “a comparison of the respective degrees of duty.” (La.
Nijel Young Versus Hard Rock Construction, L.L.C., Hard Rock Construction of Louisiana, L.L.C., and All South Consulting Engineers, … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
Bradley Broussard v. Gulfport Energy Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
“[T]he particular facts and circumstances of each individual case determines the extent of the duty and the resulting degree of care necessary to fulfill the duty.”
Broussard v. Gulfport Energy Corp. 274 So. 3d 613 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
Socorro v. City of New Orleans , , 938 (La.1991).
Ferguson v. Am. Empire Surplus Lines Ins. Co. 273 So. 3d 406 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
App. 4 Cir. 3/16/95), , 1058 (citing Socorro v. City of New Orleans , (La.
Crump v. Lake Bruin Recreation and Water Conservation District 267 So. 3d 1229 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
See Socorro v. City of New Orleans , (La.
Walker v. Manitowoc Co. 259 So. 3d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Socorro v. City of New Orleans , , 939 (La.1991).
Matthew M. Walker v. the Manitowoc Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
In deciding this issue, our supreme court has advised that “the ease of association between the duty owed and the risk encountered is a proper focus of inquiry in finding the existence of a duty.”
Christopher Blanchard v. Demetrius J. Hicks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Blanchard v. Hicks 244 So. 3d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
See Socorro v. City of New Orleans , (La.
Goldsby v. Blocker 244 So. 3d 703 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
art. 2323 ; Socorro v. City of New Orleans , (La.
Richardson v. ASI Lloyd's 206 So. 3d 349 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Chaplain v. Dimitri 174 So. 3d 222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Finch v. HRI Lodging, Inc. 152 So. 3d 1039 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2014
State v. Frith 151 So. 3d 946 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Lewis , 2012-1021 at p. 8, 112 So.3d at 801 (citing State v. Taylor, 93-2201, p. 22 (La.2/28/96), -377 ; ).
State v. Lewis 146 So. 3d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Jordan 145 So. 3d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
State v. Ross 137 So. 3d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Purvis v. Grant Parish School Board 144 So. 3d 922 La. 2014
Distinguished Olympia Minerals, LLC v. H. S. Resources, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
cited by Olympia in its response to Aspect’s objections, is distinguishable on its facts.
Distinguished Olympia Minerals, LLC v. HS Resources, Inc. 123 So. 3d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
cited by Olympia in its response to Aspect’s objections, is distinguishable on its facts.
Broussard v. State ex rel. Office of State Buildings 113 So. 3d 175 La. 2013
E.g., Caserta, 12-0853 at p. 1, 90 So.3d at 1043 ; Dauzat , 08-0528 at p. 4, 995 So.2d at 1186 ; Hutchinson , 03-1533 at p. 9, 866 So.2d at 234 ; Pitre , 95-1466 at p. 7, 673 So.2d at 589
State v. Lewis 112 So. 3d 796 La. 2013
See Taylor, 93-2201 at 22, 669 So.2d at 376-77 ; (“A juror temporarily accepted and sworn in accordance with LSA C.Cr.P.
Alexander v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A. 110 So. 3d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
State v. Mahler 157 So. 3d 626 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2013
Art. 6 {Pierce v. Hobart Carp., 939 F.2d 1305 ,1308 n. 3 (5th Cir.1991) ( )), which codifies the general rule against retroactive application of legislative enactments.
State v. Smith 108 So. 3d 376 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Jeannie Hurst Simmons v. Sabine River Authority of Louisiana La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
our supreme court noted a defendant‟s “duty [is] separate and apart from any knowledge the plaintiff had or should have 3 Although Congress did not express an intent to preempt more stringent state safety regulations for locomotive workers in either the BIA or LIA, the Napier court found the intent
Simmons v. Sabine River Authority 97 So. 3d 1177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
our supreme court noted a defendant’s “duty [is] separate and apart from any knowledge the plaintiff had or should have |n had of the danger he was encountering.” Instead, “the plaintiffs knowledge and con *1183 duct is considered only to determine the extent of his comparative negligence.” Id.
Cavet v. Louisiana Extended Care Hospital 92 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Randall v. Chalmette Medical Center, Inc., 2001-0871 (La.App.4th Cir.5/22/02), .
Daniels v. USAgencies Casualty Insurance 92 So. 3d 1049 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
State v. Lewis 96 So. 3d 1165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Thus, the Louisiana Supreme Court cited La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Seals 83 So. 3d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Jimenez v. OMNI ROYAL ORLEANS HOTEL 66 So. 3d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
The precept is derived from the notion that “a potentially dangerous condition that should be obvious to all comers is not, in all instances, unreasonably dangerous.”
Warren v. Kenny 64 So. 3d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., Nonetheless, we have recognized that defendants generally have no duty to protect against an open and obvious hazard.
Williams v. Ruben Residential Properties, LLC 58 So. 3d 534 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2011
art. 2317; Eisenhardt v. Snook, supra
Carrier v. City of Amite 50 So. 3d 1247 La. 2010
Everett v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 37 So. 3d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Vanna Darlene McManus, Etc. v. State of La., Dept. of Wildlife and Fisheries La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Carleen Willis v. Rapides Parish Communications District A/K/A 911" " La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
McManus v. State, Dept. of Wildlife & Fisheries 33 So. 3d 412 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Shelton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.