Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Watts, 579 So. 2d 931.

244 citing documents.

Broussard v. CNA Insurance Co. 628 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Raney v. Walter O. Moss Regional Hosp. 629 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Brooks v. City of Lake Charles 625 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Chamberlain v. State, Through DOTD 624 So. 2d 874 La. 1993
Indeed, we classified LSA-R.S.
Burton v. Housing Authority of New Orleans, Inc. 623 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
(because an owner cannot be held responsible for all injuries resulting from any risk, the court’s duty is to decide which risks are unreasonable).
Berthelot v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. 623 So. 2d 14 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Manchack v. Willamette Industries, Inc. 621 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
Lartigue v. McElveen 619 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Crooks v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. 620 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Limberg v. Winn Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 622 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Simeon v. Doe 618 So. 2d 848 La. 1993
See Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc., 260 La.542, (La.
Thibodeau v. Mayor and Councilmen of Morgan City 619 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Foster v. Town of Mamou 616 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Ryland v. Liberty Lloyds Ins. Co. 617 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Bradshaw v. STATE, DEPT. OF WILDLIFE & FISHERIES 616 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1993
However, the reaffirmance of the Monteville holding by a reluctantly causes me to believe the majority opinion is correct.
Katsanis v. State Farm General Ins. Co. 615 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
Smith v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Cas.
Cockerham v. Atlantic Richfield Co. 615 So. 2d 547 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Chaisson v. J.J.D. Inc. 613 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Our conclusion in this regard finds support in our Supreme Court’s
Williams v. Sewerage & Water Bd. of NO 611 So. 2d 1383 La. 1993
-46 (La.1991); La.C.C.P.
State v. Wallace 612 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Crane v. Exxon Corp., USA 613 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Voelkel 613 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Smith 609 So. 2d 809 La. 1992
Pierce v. Hobart Corp., 939 F.2d 1305 , 1308 n. 3 (5th Cir.1991) ( ).
Pool v. City of Shreveport 607 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Grow v. Transocean Contractors, Inc. 610 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Smith v. State Through Dept. of Public Safety 620 So. 2d 1172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Williams v. JEFFERSON PARISH HOSP. SERV. DIST. 604 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
However, we do find such error in the apportionment of 60% of the fault to the hospital staff
Williams v. Jefferson Parish Hospital Service District 2 604 So. 2d 1046 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
However, we do find such error in the apportionment of 60% of the fault to the hospital staff
Smith v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. 603 So. 2d 199 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Sunlake Apartment Residents v. Tonti Development Corp. 602 So. 2d 22 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Miller v. Louisiana Gas Service Co. 601 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that "`[n]egligent conduct is a cause-in-fact of harm to another if it was a substantial factor in bringing about that harm.'" , 939 (La.1991), citing Dixie Drive It Yourself Sys.
Colbert v. BF Carvin Const. Co. 600 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University 596 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
is factually similar to the present case and supports the argument that the defendants in this case had a duty to warn.
Gore v. City of Pineville 598 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
As additional support of his position, Gore urges that the Louisiana Supreme Court’s extends Rowell’s standards to civil proceedings.
Hartford Acc. & Indem. v. Illinois Cent. 598 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
indicates that these facts alone may determine that there was no duty.
Verdun v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources 598 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Verdun v. STATE THROUGH DHHR 598 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Jeffries v. Estate of Pruitt 598 So. 2d 379 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
[8] wherein the court concluded that although defendant, City's, liability insurer Angelina Casualty Company, was incorrectly named in the plaintiff's petition it was capable of making a general appearance by filing a motion for summary judgment.
State v. Johnson 595 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
Taylor v. Holiday Inn, Inc. 595 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
State v. Banks 590 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
the supreme court summarily granted a writ and reversed a trial court which refused to permit the exercise of a peremptory challenge after the juror had been “temporarily accepted and sworn” but prior to the swearing of the entire jury panel.
Hood v. State Through DOTD 587 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
The Louisiana Supreme Court, has recently held LSA-R.S.
Bernard v. Royal Ins. Co. 586 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
4th Cir. 1990), aff'd in part and rev'd in part the claimant was a freshman at Delgado College.
Oster v. Dept. of Transp. & Development 582 So. 2d 1285 La. 1991
(because an owner cannot be held responsible for all injuries resulting from any risk, the court's duty is to decide which risks are unreasonable).