Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Watts, 579 So. 2d 931.

244 citing documents.

Cormier v. Roberson 691 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Concept Design, Inc. v. JJ Krebs & Sons, Inc. 692 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Maxwell v. Board of Trustees 692 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
(because an owner cannot be held responsible for all injuries resulting from any risk, the court's duty is to decide which risks are unreasonable).
Demery v. Housing Auth. of New Orleans 689 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Boguille v. Chambers 685 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
our Supreme Court affirmed this court’s conclusion that the above statute did not give the Levee Board custody or “garde” over the entire three mile area because the Board had not reclaimed the area at issue in that case.
Moore v. Safeway, Inc. 700 So. 2d 831 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Gray v. Economy Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. 682 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Delaune v. Medical Ctr. of Baton Rouge 683 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
the supreme court shifted the focus from general responsibilities to the particular circumstances of the case to determine the extent of the duty from which the required standard of care is derived.
Kerry v. Basco 687 So. 2d 420 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Hollie v. Beauregard Parish Police Jury 680 So. 2d 1218 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University 673 So. 2d 585 La. 1996
the court of appeal also reasoned that it was not proper to focus solely upon Pitre's knowledge and conduct when examining whether Tech had a duty.
Killough v. Bituminous Cas. Corp. 674 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
Davis v. Puryear 673 So. 2d 1298 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Millet v. Cormier 671 So. 2d 1101 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Murray, 521 So.2d at 1136 (citing Shelton, 334 So.2d at 410 ).
Miller v. STATE, DOTD 679 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Sanders v. Zeagler 670 So. 2d 748 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
App. 4 Cir.1990); affirmed in part; reversed in part (on other grounds), : Louisiana Code of Evidence Article 703 reads: "The facts or data in the particular case upon which an expert bases an opinion or inference may be those perceived by or made known to him at or before the hearing.
Tenpenny v. Ringuet 670 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Inzerella v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 92-1371 (La.App.
State v. Taylor 669 So. 2d 364 La. 1996
Sloan v. Dailey 664 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Judd v. State, Dept. of Transp. and Development 663 So. 2d 690 La. 1995
1988) is that defendants failed to establish an adequate chain of custody [3] for the introduction into evidence of the blood alcohol test result.
Thomas v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 662 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Watson v. State Farm Fire & Cas.
Miller v. Evangeline Parish Police Jury 663 So. 2d 398 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Rollins v. Evangeline Parish Police Jury, 93-1293 (La.App.
Donaldson v. Sanders 661 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Tugger v. Continental Casualty Insurance Co. 658 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Morell v. City of Breaux Bridge 660 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
(because an owner cannot be held responsible for all injuries resulting from any risk, the court's duty is to decide which risks are unreasonable).
Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University 655 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Oliver v. Central Bank 658 So. 2d 1316 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
DeStevens v. Harsco Corp. 652 So. 2d 1054 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
the Supreme Court stated: [W]e have consistently held that a landowner owes a plaintiff a duty to discover any unreasonably dangerous conditions and to either correct the condition or to warn of its existence....
Hartman v. Vermilion Parish Police Jury 651 So. 2d 476 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Hasha v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury 651 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Hi-Tech Timber v. Valley Elec. Member. 649 So. 2d 1203 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Yocum v. City of Minden 649 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Crane v. Exxon Corp., U.S.A., supra .
Whitson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 647 So. 2d 558 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Brooks v. Henson Fashion Floors, Inc. 647 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Sebastien v. McKay 649 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Tatum v. Old Republic Ins. Co. 643 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Rich v. Tench Elec. Motor Works, Inc. 642 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Townsend v. Westinghouse Elevator Corporation 641 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Buffinet v. Plaquemines Parish Com'n 645 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Meany v. Meany 639 So. 2d 229 La. 1994
Redford v. Boutte 638 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Smith v. LOUISIANA HEALTH & HUMAN RES. 637 So. 2d 1177 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Reid v. State Through DOTD 637 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Watson v. State Farm, supra
Rollins v. Evangeline Parish Police Jury 640 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Douglas v. State ex rel. Dept. of Culture, Recreation & Tourism 636 So. 2d 1098 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Simpson v. State Through DOTD 636 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Indeed, and Murray v. Ramada Inns, Inc.
Chelpanoff v. Placid Oil Co. 636 So. 2d 930 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Inzerella v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 640 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Vallery v. Southern Baptist Hosp. 630 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
O'QUINN v. Power House Services, Inc. 633 So. 2d 707 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
[4] In rejecting a similar "no duty" -942 (La.1991), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: [C]are should be taken to note that we maintain our policy that "the duty which a landowner owes to persons entering his property is governed by a standard of reasonableness, and that a potentially dangerous condition that should be obvious to all comers is not