Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Stiles v. K Mart Corp., 597 So. 2d 1012.
-
Molony v. USAA Property and Cas. Ins. Co.
708 So. 2d 1220
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
(La.1992), wherein the Supreme Court reiterated that an award of future medicals should not be rejected where "...
- O'RILEY v. City of Shreveport 706 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
-
Hoskin v. Plaquemines Parish Government
703 So. 2d 207
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
That stems from the Supreme Court's per curiam opinion in Stiles v. K Mart Corp., which states: When the record establishes that future medical expenses will be necessary and inevitable, the court should not reject an award of future medical expenses on the basis that the record does not provide the exact value of the necessary expenses, if the court can examine the record and determine
-
Miller v. Ricard
685 So. 2d 195
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
In this circumstance, the rule is that a court should look to other evidence of the costs of similar past medical treatments to arrive at a reasonable amount for the future treatments, Stiles v. K Mart Corp.
- Doucet v. Doug Ashy Bldg. Materials, Inc. 671 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
- Domangue v. Mr. Gatti's, Inc. 657 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- Richard v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 657 So. 2d 1087 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- Broussard v. Meaux 649 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
- Dixon v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 638 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
-
Jones v. Trailor
636 So. 2d 1112
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
1059 , 127 L.Ed.2d 379 (1994), quoting Stiles v. K Mart Corp.
-
Brumfield v. Guilmino
633 So. 2d 903
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
See Stiles v. K Mart Corporation
-
Youn v. Maritime Overseas Corp.
623 So. 2d 1257
La. 1993
plaintiff proved that he would require future medical treatment, but did not present expert testimony as to the cost of the treatment.