Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol. Government, 615 So. 2d 289.

198 citing documents.

Bellsouth Tele. v. Indus. Enterprises 690 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
-294 (La.1993) (citations omitted).
Stroik v. Ponseti 683 So. 2d 1342 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Daigrepont v. State 688 So. 2d 1290 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Sharbino v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 690 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Rhodes v. State Through DOTD 684 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Nicholson v. Calcasieu Parish Police Jury 685 So. 2d 507 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Gray v. Economy Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. 682 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Theriot v. Lasseigne, 93-2661 (La.7/5/94)
Payton v. City of New Orleans 679 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Osborne v. Vulcan Foundry, Inc. 675 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Mix v. Krewe of Petronius 675 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Toledano v. Sewerage & Water Bd. 671 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Government, the public body was negligent for failing to provide adequate warning that a canal gate was descending onto a fishing boat.
Huddleston v. Ronald Adams Contractor, Inc. 671 So. 2d 533 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
the court identified four questions which must be considered in applying duty-risk analysis: 1.
Duffy v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 668 So. 2d 1349 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Ventress v. Union Pacific RR Co. 666 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Robinson v. Yousuf 668 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Government, Harris v. Pizza Hut of Louisiana, Inc.
Hebert v. Southwest La. Elec. Mem. Corp. 667 So. 2d 1148 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Sumner v. Sumner 664 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Freeman v. Julia Place Ltd. Partners 663 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Rogers v. Roch 663 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Johnson v. Lull Enterprises, Inc. 663 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Branch v. City of Lafayette 663 So. 2d 216 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Ayres v. Beauregard Elec. Co-Op., Inc. 663 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Donaldson v. Sanders 661 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Matthews v. Consolidated Companies, Inc. 657 So. 2d 765 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Donavan v. Jones 658 So. 2d 755 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Galloway v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVE. 654 So. 2d 1345 La. 1995
Griffin v. Danos and Curole Marine Contractors, Inc. 655 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Stewart v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co. 657 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
S. Cent. Bell Tel. Co. v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 652 So. 2d 1090 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Bell v. Crump 651 So. 2d 975 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Government, Devore v. Hobart Mfg.
Bookman v. Ciolino 648 So. 2d 982 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Depp v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 645 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Res., supra.
Theriot v. Lasseigne 640 So. 2d 1305 La. 1994
Rhodes v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 638 So. 2d 1168 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Berry v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources 637 So. 2d 412 La. 1994
Berry v. STATE THROUGH DHHR 637 So. 2d 412 La. 1994
Newsom v. STATE, DOTD 640 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Government, where the Supreme Court stated at 293: "A public body charged with maintaining a public route cannot claim lack of knowledge of the need to provide warnings where the danger is obvious and inherent in the design and construction of the facility."
Polk v. Blanque 633 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Bozeman v. Reed 633 So. 2d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Hodge v. Liquid Ventures 634 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Under this analysis plaintiff must prove: (1) the conduct in question was the cause-in-fact of the resulting harm (2) defendant owed a duty of care to plaintiff (3) the requisite duty was breached by the defendant (4) (La.
Butler v. Eastern College of Health Vo. 631 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Res., supra.
Corley v. Delaney 629 So. 2d 1255 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Government, Harris v. Pizza Hut of La., Inc., and Haskins v. State Farm Fire & Cas.
Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Dept. 627 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Coblentz v. North Peters Parking, Inc., (La.App.
Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Parish Government 625 So. 2d 683 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Berry v. STATE THROUGH DHHR 625 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Res. 620 So. 2d 811 La. 1993
Under this analysis plaintiff must prove: (1) the conduct in question was the cause-in-fact of the resulting harm (2) defendant owed a duty of care to plaintiff (3) the requisite duty was breached by the defendant (4) (La.
Miller v. Bailey 621 So. 2d 1174 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Burdis v. Lafourche Parish Police Jury 618 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consolidated Government, et al.