Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol. Government, 615 So. 2d 289.

198 citing documents.

Faulkner v. McCarty Corp. 853 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Toston v. Pardon 847 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
Rogers v. State 838 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Gov’t, the supreme court noted that a “public body charged with maintaining a public route cannot claim lack of knowledge of the need to provide warnings where the danger is obvious and inherent in the design and construction of the facility.” Furthermore, in a case dealing with DOTD changing stop signs at an
Haydin v. Crescent Guardian, Inc. 818 So. 2d 1033 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Estain v. United States, Department of Transportation & Development 819 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Kelly v. Boh Brothers Construction Company, Inc., 96-1051 (La.App.
Estain Ex Rel. Lavoice v. US Dotd 819 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Kelly v. Boh Brothers Construction Company, Inc., 96-1051 (La.App.
Pinsonneault v. Merchants & Farmers Bank & Trust Company 816 So. 2d 270 La. 2002
Peterson v. Gibraltar Savings & Loan, 98-1601, 98-1609, p. 7 (La.5/18/99)
In Re New Orleans Train Car Leakage Fire Litigation 795 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Marmer v. Queen of New Orleans 787 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Snearl v. Mercer 780 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Brow v. Allstate Indemnity Co. 771 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Gov’t, Clark v. Dep’t of Public Safety and Corrections, 96-2737 (La.App.
Pradia v. Southern Personnel of La., Inc. 776 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Guillory v. Dillard's Dept. Store, Inc. 777 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Harris v. Stimac 768 So. 2d 265 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Cuevas v. City of New Orleans 769 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consolidated Government, 92-0930 (La.3/25/93), .
Sommer v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. DEVELOPMENT 758 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
Carver, Inc. v. Dixon 759 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Paul v. LOUISIANA STATE EMPLOYEES'GROUP 762 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consol., Gov't, Clark v. Dep't of Pub.
Perkins v. Entergy Corp. 756 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
(citing Green, The Causal Relation Issue and Negligence Law, 60 Mich.L.Rev.
Sommer v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 758 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Posecai v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 752 So. 2d 762 La. 1999
Sevario v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp. 752 So. 2d 221 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Latiolais v. Guillory 747 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Richard v. Swiber 760 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Gov't, Clark v. Dep't of Pub.
Hardy v. Bowie 744 So. 2d 606 La. 1999
Cormier v. THE Ins. Co. 745 So. 2d 1 La. 1999
Kemper v. Don Coleman, Jr., Builder, Inc. 746 So. 2d 11 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp., 94,0952 (La.11/30/94)
Thomas v. Sport City, Inc. 738 So. 2d 1153 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp., 94-0952 (La.11/30/94), ; (La.
Peterson v. Gibraltar Sav. and Loan 733 So. 2d 1198 La. 1999
cause-in-fact of the resulting harm; 2) defendant owed a duty of care to plaintiff; 3) the requisite duty was breached by the defendant; *1204 4) the risk of harm was within the scope of protection afforded by the duty breached Mundy v. The Department of Health and Human Resources, et al., 92-3251 (La.6/17/93), ; Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consolidated Government, 92-0930 (La.2/22/93), , rehearing denied 3/25/93; Mart v. Hill, 86-2191, 86-2200, (La.
Morrison v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity 738 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp., 94-0952 (La.11/30/94)
Butcher v. City of Monroe 737 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Theriot v. Lasseigne, 93-2661 (La.7/5/94)
Scott v. Rapides Parish School Bd. 732 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Government, (citations omitted), The scope of protection inquiry asks whether the enunciated rule extends to or is intended to protect this plaintiff from this type of harm arising in this manner.
South Cent. Bell v. WOMACK & ASSOCIATES 744 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
-93 (La.1993), the supreme court stated, "The violation of a statute or regulation does not automatically, in and of itself, impose civil liability.
Nassif v. Sunrise Homes, Inc. 720 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
1st Cir.1992), writ granted, rev’d on other grounds, reh’g denied on remand, (La.App.
Banks v. State Farm Ins. Co. 717 So. 2d 687 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Theriot v. Lasseigne, 93-2661 (La.7/5/94)
Porteous v. St. Ann's Cafe & Deli 713 So. 2d 454 La. 1998
Swinford v. Dolphin Construction Co. 716 So. 2d 29 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
rehearing denied March 25, 1993.
Phillip v. University Medical Center 714 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Clark v. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 716 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Philippe v. Lloyd's Aero Boliviano 710 So. 2d 807 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Clark v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 716 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Walker v. Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity (Rho Chapter) 706 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Goodliffe v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 702 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
Blanchard v. STATE, THROUGH PARKS & REC. COM'N 702 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consolidated Government, et al.
Blanchard v. State ex rel. Parks & Recreation Commission 702 So. 2d 768 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Faucheaux v. Terrebonne Consolidated Government, et al.
Stroik v. Ponseti 699 So. 2d 1072 La. 1997
Williams v. Dean 694 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Francisco v. Joan of Arc Co. 692 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Tassin v. State Farm Ins. Co. 692 So. 2d 604 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Under this analysis plaintiff must prove: (1) the conduct in question was the cause-in-fact of the resulting harm (2) defendant owed a duty of care to plaintiff (3) the requisite duty was breached by the defendant (4) (La.
Hardenstein v. COOK CONST. INC. 691 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997