Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tugwell v. State Farm Ins. Co., 609 So. 2d 195.

189 citing documents.

Renee Jackson & Antione Coleman Versus Liberty Personal Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2020
Justin Crowley v. Goauto Insurance Company, Brionne L. Myles, and Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Co., (citing Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins.
Lonny Hayes v. Viviana Trevino De Barton La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
Draayer v. Allen 195 So. 3d 78 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Frank Tuson v. Merlyn Rodgers La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Tuson v. Rodgers 165 So. 3d 458 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
James Bergeron v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Bergeron v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 92 So. 3d 645 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Gunter v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 86 So. 3d 716 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Naddia Melder, Et Ux. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile ins.co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
Co., Henson v. Safeco Ins.
Melder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 66 So. 3d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Co., Henson v. Safeco Ins.
Ware v. Gemini Insurance Co. 51 So. 3d 179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., Henson v. Safeco Ins.
Bordelon v. Western Heritage Insurance Co. 48 So. 3d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., Henson v. Safeco Ins.
National Interstate Insurance v. Collins 9 So. 3d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., Henson v. Safeco Ins.
Theodore E. Filipski, III v. Imperial Fire and Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Filipski v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance 9 So. 3d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Johnson v. Folse 986 So. 2d 110 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Julia A. Rashall v. Charles K. Pennington La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Rashall v. Pennington 982 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Gray v. American Nat. Property & Cas. Co. 977 So. 2d 839 La. 2008
Fescharek v. US Agencies Ins. Co. 979 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2008
Co., Henson v. Safeco Ins.
Pigron v. Allstate Ins. Co. 972 So. 2d 1269 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Co., Henson v. Safeco Ins.
Shannon Pigron v. Allstate Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Co., Henson v. Safeco Ins.
Franques v. Jones 961 So. 2d 1253 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Co., to the effect that the rejection form must be devised in such a manner as to make it, “apparent to the reasonable person that he has the option of selecting any lower limit he chooses.” The defendants contend that the Lumbermens form is defective in not providing Burger King with the option of selecting
Duncan v. USAA Ins. Co. 950 So. 2d 544 La. 2007
Co., Henson v. Safeco Ins.
Hymel v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. 947 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
SUCCESSION OF GREER v. Mills 942 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Co., Duong v. Salas, 38,613 (La.App.2d Cir.6/23/04) , writ denied, 04-1840 (La.10/29/04), .
Dupuy v. Allstate Ins. Co. 920 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2005
McFarland v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 902 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
McFarland v. SOUTH. FARM BUR. CAS. INS. CO. 902 So. 2d 1207 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
Millet v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance 887 So. 2d 603 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Duong v. Salas 877 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
Co., Thomas v. Goodson, 26,356 (La.
Knight v. Owens 869 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2004
Co., Henson, 585 So.2d at 538.
Watson v. Bulloch 868 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
See, see also, Matthews v. Maddie, 2001-1535 (La.App.
Reno v. Travelers Home and Marine Ins. Co. 867 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Midence v. Williams 860 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Burns v. Hetler 842 So. 2d 1111 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Co., we held that a rejection form used by an insurance company must inform the applicant of the available options regarding UM coverage so that the applicant can make a meaningful selection from among the options provided by the statute [[Image here]] In Tugwell , we noted that the task of informing the applica
Bel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 845 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Dabney v. Plaisance 832 So. 2d 1103 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
(1992) that a rejection form must give the applicant an opportunity to make a meaningful selection by spelling out the insured's option under the UM statute: At all times relevant to this case, La.
Campbell v. Verrett 829 So. 2d 1141 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Dixon v. Gene Moody Trucking, Inc. 830 So. 2d 392 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Co., Franklin v. Coleman, supra .
Shirley v. Centennial Insurance Co. 829 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
-199 ; Doyle v. Titan Indem.
Esteve v. US Agencies Cas. Ins. Co., Inc. 818 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Duhon v. Baquet 815 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
Pekins v. American Central Insurance Co. 806 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Mosing v. Domas 798 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Harris v. Eckerd Corp. 796 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Franklin v. Coleman 793 So. 2d 467 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Walker v. Clarendon National Insurance 791 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Pike v. National Union Fire Insurance 796 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001