Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Alexis v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 604 So. 2d 581.

33 citing documents.

Danielle Ann Ray, inviduallly and on behalf of her minor child, Hunter Wayne Garner v. Lynx Production Services, … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Charles A. Gibson, Sr. Versus Byron L. Lee and Hon. Jon A. Gegenehimer, Jefferson Parish Clerk of Court La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2023
Silton Ardoin v. Gde Renovations, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Additionally, “the adverse party must have believed the fact was no longer at issue or must have relied on it, to his detriment.” Lamb, 732 So.2d at 1272; Jefferson Parish v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 95–951 (La.App.
AG Resource Management, LLC. and Agrifund, LLC v. Bunge North America, Inc. and Danny Allen Dickerson La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2020
Elizabeth Webb v. Daniel Andrew Webb 263 So. 3d 321 La. 2018
Chelsea MacE v. Sherman Turner La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Co., Jefferson Parish v. [Fid.]
Dean v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 217 So. 3d 611 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
Bayou Rapides Corp. v. Michael Dole, Et Ux. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Co., Jefferson Parish v. [Fid.]
Bayou Rapides Corp. v. Dole 165 So. 3d 373 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., Jefferson Parish v. [Fid.]
Davis v. Cheema, Inc. 171 So. 3d 984 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Rebecca Deville v. Progressive Security Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Additionally, “the adverse party must have believed the fact was no longer at issue or must have relied on it, to his detriment.” Lamb, 732 So.2d at 4 1272; Jefferson Parish v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 95-951 (La.App.
B.A. Kelly Land Co., L.L.C. v. Questar Exploration & Production Co. 106 So. 3d 181 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
Steinfelds v. Villarubia 53 So. 3d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Co., the Louisiana Supreme Court considered whether plaintiffs allegation in his workers’ compensation suit that he was disabled as a result of a work-related accident constituted a judicial admission against him in a subsequent suit wherein he sought benefits under an insurance policy.
Dexter Mitchell v. Artcrete, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Co., Jefferson Parish v. [Fid.]
Mitchell v. ARTCRETE, INC. 24 So. 3d 1000 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Co., Jefferson Parish v. [Fid,.]
Carter v. DP & L TIMBER 944 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Co., Jefferson Parish v. [Fid.]
Ronald J. Carter v. Dp & L Timber La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
Co., Jefferson Parish v. [Fid.]
City of Shreveport v. Noel Estate, Inc. 941 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Opti-Flow, LLC v. Production Services International,ltd. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
Additionally, “the adverse party must have believed the fact was no longer at issue or must have relied on it, to his detriment.” Lamb, 732 So.2d at 1272; Jefferson Parish v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 95-951 (La.App.
Opti-Flow, LLC v. Production Services International, Ltd. 903 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Additionally, “the adverse party must have believed the fact was no longer at issue or must have relied on it, to his detriment.” Lamb, 732 So.2d at 1272 ; Jefferson Parish v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 95-951 (La.App.
Leslie Leday v. Safeway Ins. Co. of La. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Additionally, “the adverse party must have believed the fact was no longer at issue or must have relied on it, to his detriment.” Lamb, 732 So.2d at 1272; (La.
Leday v. Safeway Ins. Co. of La. 888 So. 2d 1084 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Lamb, 732 So.2d at 1272 ; Jefferson Parish v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 95-951 (La.App.
Joshua Terrell, Indiv. Etc. v. Town of Merryville La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Terrell v. Town of Merryville 886 So. 2d 1278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
CT Traina, Inc. v. Sunshine Plaza, Inc. 861 So. 2d 156 La. 2003
Soileau v. ABC Insurance Co. 844 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Bellard v. Castille 759 So. 2d 789 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State v. Lamb 732 So. 2d 1270 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Co., Jefferson Parish *1273 Clerk of Court Health Ins.
Duckworth-Woods Tire Service v. Lettellier 720 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Co., for the proposition that an “extra-judicial” confession does not bind the claimant in subsequent litigation; therefore, the allegation contained in the worker’s compensation suit is not a judicial admission, with its conclusive effect, in the present proceeding.
Metro Riverboat Associates, Inc. v. Bally's Louisiana, Inc. 706 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
Co., and sources cited therein.
Kanz v. Wilson 703 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Co., the supreme court considered whether plaintiff's allegation in his workers' compensation suit that he was disabled as a result of a work-related accident constituted a judicial admission against him in a subsequent suit wherein he sought benefits under an insurance policy.
Gauthier v. Benson 667 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Taylor v. Sider 665 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Co., Succession of Turner, 235 La.