Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite La. Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, 616 So. 2d 1250.

74 citing documents.

Alisa Alan Durkheimer v. Tranise L. Landry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Servs., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Christian Blaine Perkins v. Dusty King La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2023
Servs., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Wilton Crochet and Sabena Crochet v. Nick's Refrigeration Sales and Service, Inc., United Fire Group and Nationwide General … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
C. C. art. 2057; Louisiana Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd' s of London, ( La.
Towanda M. Savoy v. Vonkerri L. Kelly-Dixon La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Servs., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
State of Louisiana v. Jonathon Wayne Aubrey La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
Servs., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Katty Calderon, Natural Mother of the Decedent, Avril Sanabria Versus Lezly Sanabria, Suly Sanabria, Jonathan Rivera, Abc Insurance … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2022
Louisiana Maintenance Services, (La.
Zydeco's II, LLC, Zydeco's Corp, Dustin Gainey and Rosemarie Gainey Versus Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
22:1973 require proof that the insurer was “arbitrary, capricious, or without probable cause,” a phrase that is synonymous with “vexatious.” Sher, 988 So.2d at 206; Louisiana Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, (La.
Diane McKernan v. ABC Insurance Company, AIG Property Casualty Company, Brad Bourg, Bourg Insurance Agency, Inc. La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Servs., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd' s of London, ( La.
Estate of John. F. Munsterman v. Unitrin Auto & Home Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2020
Servs., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Amanda Bertrand v. Progressive Security Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Servs., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, ).
Louise Theresa Doty v. Goauto Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Servs., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, ).
Doty v. Goauto Ins. Co. 251 So. 3d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Servs., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London , , 1253 (La.1993) ).
Shreve v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 247 So. 3d 1175 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2018
10/21/03), ; Louisiana Maintenance Servs., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London , (La.
Davis v. Nola Home Construction, L.L.C. 222 So. 3d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
Servs., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, (La.
Steven Odstrcil v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
22:1220 require proof that the insurer was “arbitrary, capricious, or without probable cause,” a phrase that is synonymous with “vexatious.” Louisiana Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Odstrcil v. State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co. 221 So. 3d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
22:1220 require proof that the insurer was “arbitrary, capricious, or without probable cause,” a phrase that is synonymous with “vexatious.” Louisiana Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Jackie Doucet v. Darwin Select Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Kevin Melbert v. Compsource Oklahoma La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2014
Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Melbert v. Compsource Oklahoma 149 So. 3d 841 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Patterson v. Stephenson's Tree Service, LLC 110 So. 3d 614 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, Stills v. Mims, 42,799 (La.App.
Judith Langlinais Mistich v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Servs, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, (citations omitted) (emphasis added).
Mistich v. Weeks 107 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Servs, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, (citations omitted) (emphasis added).
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Norcold, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Servs., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Norcold, Inc. 88 So. 3d 1245 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Servs., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Rider v. Ambeau 100 So. 3d 849 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Gaylord Chemical Corporation, v. ProPump, Inc., 98-2367 (La.App 1st Cir.2/18/00), , 352; see also Louisiana Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, (providing that it is the insurer who bears the burden of proving that a loss falls within a policy exclusion).
Anton, Ltd. v. Colony Insurance Co. 77 So. 3d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
One of the cases upon which Anton relies on is Louisiana Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, et al.
Hayes v. Rotolo 77 So. 3d 76 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Louisiana Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Oubre v. Louisiana Citizens Fair Plan 53 So. 3d 492 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Louisiana Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Willwoods Community v. Essex Insurance 33 So. 3d 1102 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Louisiana Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Sensebe v. Canal Indemnity Co. 35 So. 3d 1122 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Louisiana Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Schurr v. Gagnon 36 So. 3d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Louisiana Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Betty Jean Pharis Morrison v. Alexandria Commons, LLC La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Servs., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Morrison v. Alexandria Commons, LLC 25 So. 3d 989 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Servs., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Guillory v. Lee 16 So. 3d 1104 La. 2009
's, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, ).
Starr v. Brou 8 So. 3d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Louisiana Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Louisiana Bag Co., Inc. v. Audubon Indem. Co. 999 So. 2d 1104 La. 2008
Riser v. Shelter Mut. Ins. Co. 997 So. 2d 675 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Louisiana Maintenance Services, Lewis v. State Farm Ins.
Talton v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co. 981 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
In Louisiana Maintenance Services, the Court stated: "Vexatious refusal to pay" means unjustified, without reasonable or probable cause or excuse.
MacLaff, Inc. v. Arch Ins. Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Servs., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
Pritchard v. Shelter Insurance Co. 978 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Louisiana Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London
MaClaff, Inc. v. Arch Ins. Co. 978 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Straughter v. Hodnett 975 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Louisiana Maintenance Services, Sims v. Insurance Unlimited of West Monroe, 28,234 (La.App.2d Cir.2/28/96), 669 So.2d *88 709, writ denied, 96-0785 (La.5/3/96), .
McGehee v. Benton 962 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Louisiana Maintenance Services, -1253 (La.
North Amer. Treat. Sys. v. Scottsdale Ins. 943 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Louisiana Maintenance Services
Combetta v. Ordoyne 934 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
Louisiana Maintenance Services
Rapp v. GEICO Indemnity Co. 925 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
22:628 and 22:634 were passed by the Louisiana Legislature and before said statutes were interpreted by the Louisiana State Supreme Court in Louisiana Maintenance Services, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London, 92-2382 (La.04/12/93), Rapp further argues that the trial court erred in concluding that the limitations or exclusions of said policy did not have to be clearly communicated to the insured for the policy provisions to be effective against him.
Doe v. Breedlove 906 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
Louisiana Maintenance Services
Rando v. Top Notch Properties, LLC 879 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Louisiana Maintenance Services
Roger D. Clark v. Beau C. McNabb and Shelter Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
We have described an insurer=s actions as Aarbitrary and capricious@ when its willful refusal of a claim is not based on a good faith defense, Louisiana Maintenance Servs., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd=s of London, or is unreasonable or without probable cause, Darby v. Safeco Ins.
Clark v. McNabb 878 So. 2d 677 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
We have described an insurer's actions as "arbitrary and capricious" when its willful refusal of a claim is not based on a good faith defense, Louisiana Maintenance Servs., or is unreasonable or without probable cause, Darby v. Safeco Ins.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by