Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Touchard v. Williams, 617 So. 2d 885.

192 citing documents.

AK DURNIN CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH v. Jones 818 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Rougeau v. Hyundai Motor America, 01-1182, p. 2 (La.1/15/02)
State ex rel. S.D. 807 So. 2d 1138 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
Rougeau v. Hyundai Motor America 805 So. 2d 147 La. 2002
Lenard v. Dilley 805 So. 2d 175 La. 2002
Cat's Meow, Inc. v. City of *179 New Orleans, 98-0601, p. 15 (La.10/20/98)
Lukens v. City of New Orleans 806 So. 2d 875 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
the Supreme Court explained that the 1987 amendment to La.
Ross v. Conoco, Inc. 805 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Page v. Abigails 799 So. 2d 785 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
In the Interest of C.F. 796 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
La.Civ.Code art. 9; Bellard v. Omni Geographic, 00-717 (La.App.
Butler v. Allen 808 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Burnette v. Stalder 789 So. 2d 573 La. 2001
The function of statutory interpretation and the construction to be given legislative acts rests with the judicial branch of government.
SWAT 24 Shreveport Bossier, Inc. v. Bond 808 So. 2d 294 La. 2001
Cat's Meow, Inc. v. City of New Orleans, 98-0601, p. 15 (La.10/20/98)
Abney v. Charity Hospital in New Orleans 787 So. 2d 1123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
.must be strictly construed against limiting the tort claimants’ rights against the wrongdoer.” Branch v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center, 92-3086 (La.4/28/94), ; Kelty v. Brumfield, 93-1142 (La.2/25/94), ; Roberts v. Sewerage & Water Board, 92-2048 (La.3/21/94), ; Galloway v. Baton Rouge Gen.
Schiro v. STATE THROUGH DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 808 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
The Court stated, "[t]he fact that DOTD's solidary liablity was capped at 50% under article 2324(B) and Touchard [ v. Williams, ] does not alter DOTD's right to receive a settlement credit for Beaver's portion of the debt under [La.
Bourgeois v. AP Green Industries, Inc. 783 So. 2d 1251 La. 2001
A.M., 98-2752, p. 2 (La.7/2/99), ; State Licensing Bd.
Schiro v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 808 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
The Court stated, “[t]he fact that DOTD’s soli-dary liablity was capped at 50% under article 2324(B) and Touchard [v. Williams, ] hdoes not alter DOTD’s right to receive a settlement credit for Beaver’s portion of the debt under [La.
Frazer v. St. Tammany Parish School Bd. 774 So. 2d 1227 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
[6] the supreme court interpreted this same version of LSA-C.C.
Dennis v. the Finish Line, Inc. 781 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
[16] the supreme court interpreted Article 2324(B) to mean that, except for tortfeasors whose liability is greater than 50%, each tortfeasor is solidarily liable for 50% of the plaintiff's recoverable damages.
Hall v. Zen-Noh Grain Corp. 777 So. 2d 523 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
Husband v. Darby 772 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Duncan v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co. 773 So. 2d 670 La. 2000
in which this court held, in interpreting La.
Louisiana Mun. Ass'n v. State 773 So. 2d 663 La. 2000
Hall v. Zen-Noh Grain Corp. 769 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
In re Succession of Ott 768 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Schackai v. Louisiana Bd. of Massage Therapy 767 So. 2d 955 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 765 So. 2d 994 La. 2000
[1] However, the court amended the judgment to hold DOTD liable in solido for 50% of the damages, or $203,433.00, pursuant to Civil Code article 2324(B) as it existed in 1991
Cacamo v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co. 764 So. 2d 41 La. 2000
Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins., Co., 95-2895 (La.5/20/97)
State v. Carr 761 So. 2d 1271 La. 2000
Barringer Lands, Ltd. v. Barringer 761 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
O'REGAN v. Preferred Enterprises, Inc. 758 So. 2d 124 La. 2000
COLE-MIERS POST 3619 VFW v. State, Department of Revenue & Taxation 765 So. 2d 312 La. 2000
In Re Succession of Boyter 756 So. 2d 1122 La. 2000
Farbe v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 746 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Touchard v. Williams, 92-2919 (La.4/12/93); , appeal after remand, 94-777 (La.App.
Falgout v. Dealers Truck Equipment Co. 748 So. 2d 399 La. 1999
In Re Louisiana Health Service & Indem. 749 So. 2d 610 La. 1999
(quoting Zeringue v. State, Dep't of Pub.
State v. Barbier 743 So. 2d 1236 La. 1999
Cole-Miers Post 3619 V.F.W. of Deridder v. State, Department of Revenue & Taxation, Office of Alcoholic Beverage Control 747 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
State ex rel. A.M. 739 So. 2d 188 La. 1999
Folse v. Folse 738 So. 2d 1040 La. 1999
Washington v. Entergy Corp. 729 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Co., 95-2895, p. 4 (La.5/20/97)
LA DEPT. OF AGRI. & FORESTRY v. Sumrall 728 So. 2d 1254 La. 1999
City of New Orleans v. Bd. of Dir. of State Museum 739 So. 2d 748 La. 1999
Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry v. Sumrall 728 So. 2d 1254 La. 1999
King v. Caddo Parish Com'n 727 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Bellard v. Grey Wolf Drilling 722 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Antoine 721 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Cat's Meow, Inc. v. City of New Orleans Through Department of Finance 720 So. 2d 1186 La. 1998
Batson v. South Louisiana Medical Center 724 So. 2d 782 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
the supreme court determined that this version of Louisiana Civil Code art. 2324 was not clear and free of ambiguity, particularly the phrase in question.
Conerly v. State 714 So. 2d 709 La. 1998
art. 1; Ruiz , 97-2412 at p. 4, 713 So.2d at 444 ; Hutchinson , 93-2156 at p. 5, 637 So.2d at 420 ; Backhus v. Transit Cas.
Ruiz v. Oniate 713 So. 2d 442 La. 1998
art. 1; Hutchinson , 93-2156 at p. 5, 637 So.2d at 420 ; Backhus v. Transit Cas.
Jones v. Hawkins 708 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Touchard v. Williams, 92-2919 (La.4/12/93), , and citations therein.