Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Touchard v. Williams, 617 So. 2d 885.

192 citing documents.

Dugas v. Durr 707 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
Decourt v. Caracci 704 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
[3] the Louisiana Supreme Court noted that, "As discussed, solidary liability among joint tortfeasors has been a part of the Louisiana civilian tradition for over 150 years.
Bourgeois v. Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc. 702 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Hebard v. Dillon 699 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Rushing v. City of Baton Rouge 696 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Theriot v. Midland Risk Ins. Co. 694 So. 2d 184 La. 1997
Citywide Testing & Inspections, Inc. v. Board of Ethics for Elected Officials 693 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
Willis v. Gray Sales & Service, Inc. 689 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
underscored the importance of ascertaining the legislature's intent and rationale in enacting a statute.
Hughes v. Carroll Timber Co. 694 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Louviere v. Woodson Construction Co. 679 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Martin v. David 685 So. 2d 158 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Fontenot v. Chevron USA Inc. 676 So. 2d 557 La. 1996
the paramount consideration for statutory interpretation is the ascertainment of the legislative intent and the reason or reasons which prompted the legislature to enact the law.
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Melancon 677 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
James v. Formosa Plastics Corp. of La. 672 So. 2d 319 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Touchard v. Williams 671 So. 2d 1065 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
The plaintiff-appellant, Mary Touehard
Ventress v. Union Pacific RR Co. 666 So. 2d 1210 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
art. 2324 B Union Pacific is liable for 50% of plaintiff's recoverable damages without taking into account his settlement with Brockhoeff's Chevrolet.
Mayeur v. Campbell 666 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Olivier v. Gray Insurance Co. 664 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
App. 3 Cir.), writ granted, affirmed in part, reversed in part, where $100,000 was awarded to a plaintiff who suffered an injury at L-5/S-1 which required surgery, |6injury to the cervical spine, muscle spasms and contusions over most of her body; Simmons v. Calcasieu Community Center Playground, Dist.
Garrett v. Seventh Ward General Hosp. 660 So. 2d 841 La. 1995
Cavalier v. Cain's Hydrostatic Testing, Inc. 657 So. 2d 975 La. 1995
The trial court assessed liability at twenty percent, without discussion of whether the third party tortfeasor was solidarily liable for an additional thirty percent of the damages under the 1987 amendment to La.Civ.Code art. 2324B which, limits the solidary liability for each negligent joint tortfeasor to fifty percent of the recoverable damages.
Charrier v. Charrier 653 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
art. 10; Hutchinson, 93-2156, 637 So.2d at 420
Ehrman v. Holiday Inns, Inc. 653 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates, Ltd. 650 So. 2d 712 La. 1995
[4] Touchard *723 v. Williams, -92 (La.1993).
Trahan v. McManus 653 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
art. 10; Hutchinson, supra, at 420
Simon v. Fasig-Tipton Co. 652 So. 2d 1351 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
"Solidary liability among co-tortfeasors has been a part of Louisiana's civil tradition for over 150 years."
St. Landry Parish Police Jury v. Zerangue 651 So. 2d 970 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Blackwell v. St. Romain Oil Co. 651 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Bush v. Arrow International 646 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
3d Cir.1992), quantum 16affirmed, ($100,000.00 affirmed); (La.App.
In re C.B. 643 So. 2d 1251 La. 1994
art. 10; Hutchinson, 93-2156, 637 So.2d at 420
In Re CB, Applying for Adoption 643 So. 2d 1251 La. 1994
art. 10; Hutchinson, 93-2156, 637 So.2d at 420
Bourque v. Bailey 643 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
In Matter of American Waste and Pollution Control Co. 642 So. 2d 1258 La. 1994
City of Zwolle v. Polk 643 So. 2d 201 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Mayo v. Nissan Motor Corp. 639 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Hutchinson v. Patel 637 So. 2d 415 La. 1994
Hosp., Monteville v. Terrebonne Par.
Branch v. Willis-Knighton Medical Center 636 So. 2d 211 La. 1994
3/21/94), ; Galloway v. Baton Rouge Gen.
Kelty v. Brumfield 633 So. 2d 1210 La. 1994
First Page v. Network Paging Corp. 628 So. 2d 130 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Taylor v. US Fidelity & Guar. Ins. Co. 630 So. 2d 237 La. 1993
Carr v. City of New Orleans 626 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
It is FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the liability of Nolmar (and its insurers) and the City is joint, divisible and in solido for up to 50% of the plaintiffs' damages in accordance with Civil Code Article 2324 , (La.1993).
Hayes v. Kelly 625 So. 2d 628 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
at the time of its judgment.
Gauthier v. O'BRIEN 618 So. 2d 825 La. 1993