Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reeder v. Succession of Palmer, 623 So. 2d 1268.

57 citing documents.

Vergne v. Lamaze 670 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
In determining which standard of res judicata to apply, the Louisiana Supreme Court has held that federal law must be applied in determining the basic res judicata effect of a prior ruling of a federal district court Pilie & cert.
Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co. 666 So. 2d 624 La. 1996
A five-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal concluded that the bankruptcy court's confirmation of the Plan of Reorganization acted as a res judicata bar to the state breach of contract lawsuit, where we held in an analogous case (as will be explained further below), that federal law of res judicata should apply.
Palmer v. LANCO CONST., INC. 665 So. 2d 1217 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Tye v. Co-Mar Offshore Operators, Inc. 669 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
City of New Orleans v. Badine Land Ltd. 657 So. 2d 770 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Tolis v. BD. OF SUP'RS OF LA. STATE UNIV. & AGR. & MECHANICAL COLLEGE 655 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
However, because the federal court's jurisdiction in the instant case was based on federal question jurisdiction, rather than diversity jurisdiction, a state court considering the preclusive effect of the judgment must apply the federal law of res judicata, cert.
Mayronne v. Vaught 655 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
cert, denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct.